Examining the Diagnostic Yield of Tumour Testing and Qualifying Germline Concordance for Hereditary Cancer Variants in Patients with High-Grade Serous Carcinoma

Despite advances in treatment, prognosis for most patients with high-grade serous carcinoma (HGSC) remains poor. Genomic alterations in the homologous recombination (HR) pathway are used for cancer risk assessment and render tumours sensitive to platinum-based chemotherapy and poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors (PARPi), which can be associated with more favourable outcomes. In addition to patients with tumours containing BRCA1 or BRCA2 pathologic variants, there is emerging evidence that patients with tumours harbouring pathologic variants in other HR genes may also benefit from PARPi therapy. The objective of this study is to assess the feasibility of primary-tumour testing by examining the concordance of variant detection between germline and tumour-variant status using a custom hereditary cancer gene panel (HCP). From April 2019 to November 2020, HCP variant testing was performed on 146 HGSC formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissue samples using next-generation sequencing. Of those, 78 patients also underwent HCP germline testing using blood samples. A pathogenic variant was detected in 41.1% (60/146) of tumours tested, with 68.3% (41/60) having either a BRCA1 or BRCA2 variant (n = 36), or BRCA1/2 plus a second variant (n = 5), and 31.2% (19/60) carrying a pathogenic variant in another HCP gene. The overall variant rate among the paired germline and tumour samples was 43.6% (34/78), with the remaining 56% (44/78) having no pathogenic variant detected in the germline or tumour. The overall BRCA1/2 variant rate for paired samples was 33.3% (26/78), with germline variants detected in 11.5% (9/78). A non-BRCA1/2 germline variant in another HCP gene was detected in 9.0% (7/78). All germline variants were detected in the tumour, demonstrating 100% concordance. These data provide evidence supporting the feasibility of primary-tumour testing for detecting germline and somatic variants in HCP genes in patients with HGSC, which can be used to guide clinical decision-making, and may provide opportunity for improving patient triage and clinical genetic referral practices.

[1]  A. Oza,et al.  Rucaparib maintenance treatment for recurrent ovarian carcinoma: the effects of progression-free interval and prior therapies on efficacy and safety in the randomized phase III trial ARIEL3 , 2021, International Journal of Gynecological Cancer.

[2]  J. Kolesar,et al.  MUTYH as an Emerging Predictive Biomarker in Ovarian Cancer , 2021, Diagnostics.

[3]  M. Tarnopolsky,et al.  Validation and clinical performance of a combined nuclear‐mitochondrial next‐generation sequencing and copy number variant analysis panel in a Canadian population , 2020, American journal of medical genetics. Part A.

[4]  B. Clarke,et al.  Tumor and germline next generation sequencing in high grade serous cancer: experience from a large population‐based testing program , 2020, Molecular oncology.

[5]  G. Scambia,et al.  Ovarian cancer predisposition beyond BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes , 2020, International Journal of Gynecological Cancer.

[6]  T. Stockley,et al.  Year 1: Experiences of a tertiary cancer centre following implementation of reflex BRCA1 and BRCA2 tumor testing for all high-grade serous ovarian cancers in a universal healthcare system. , 2020, Gynecologic oncology.

[7]  P. Ainsworth,et al.  Genetic and epigenetic profiling of BRCA1/2 in ovarian tumors reveals additive diagnostic yield and evidence of a genomic BRCA1/2 DNA methylation signature , 2020, Journal of Human Genetics.

[8]  K. Jacob,et al.  Group plus “mini” individual pre-test genetic counselling sessions for hereditary cancer shorten provider time and improve patient satisfaction , 2020, Hereditary Cancer in Clinical Practice.

[9]  E. Kohn,et al.  Germline and Somatic Tumor Testing in Epithelial Ovarian Cancer: ASCO Guideline. , 2020, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[10]  F. Marmé,et al.  Olaparib plus Bevacizumab as First-Line Maintenance in Ovarian Cancer. , 2019, The New England journal of medicine.

[11]  T. Putti,et al.  Using next-generation sequencing (NGS) platform to diagnose pathogenic germline BRCA1/2 mutations from archival tumor specimens. , 2019, Gynecologic Oncology.

[12]  B. Bonanni,et al.  Tumor BRCA Test for Patients with Epithelial Ovarian Cancer: The Role of Molecular Pathology in the Era of PARP Inhibitor Therapy , 2019, Cancers.

[13]  B. Monk,et al.  Niraparib in Patients with Newly Diagnosed Advanced Ovarian Cancer. , 2019, The New England journal of medicine.

[14]  M. Morgan,et al.  Veliparib with First-Line Chemotherapy and as Maintenance Therapy in Ovarian Cancer. , 2019, The New England journal of medicine.

[15]  M. C. Vos,et al.  Universal Tumor DNA BRCA1/2 Testing of Ovarian Cancer: Prescreening PARPi Treatment and Genetic Predisposition , 2019, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[16]  B. Monk,et al.  Niraparib monotherapy for late-line treatment of ovarian cancer (QUADRA): a multicentre, open-label, single-arm, phase 2 trial. , 2019, The Lancet. Oncology.

[17]  N. Foley,et al.  Direct Genetics Referral Pathway for High-Grade Serous Ovarian Cancer Patients: The “Opt-Out” Process , 2019, Journal of oncology.

[18]  Gabe S. Sonke,et al.  Maintenance Olaparib in Patients with Newly Diagnosed Advanced Ovarian Cancer , 2018, The New England journal of medicine.

[19]  A. Sokolenko,et al.  Molecular Diagnostics in Clinical Oncology , 2018, Front. Mol. Biosci..

[20]  W. Meschino,et al.  Evolution of genetic assessment for BRCA-associated gynaecologic malignancies: a Canadian multisociety roadmap , 2018, Journal of Medical Genetics.

[21]  Hanxin Lin,et al.  Clinical Validation of Copy Number Variant Detection from Targeted Next-Generation Sequencing Panels. , 2017, The Journal of molecular diagnostics : JMD.

[22]  W. Chung,et al.  The impact of hereditary cancer gene panels on clinical care and lessons learned , 2017, Cold Spring Harbor molecular case studies.

[23]  James X. Sun,et al.  Rucaparib maintenance treatment for recurrent ovarian carcinoma after response to platinum therapy (ARIEL3): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial , 2017, The Lancet.

[24]  A. Tinker,et al.  BRCA1 and RAD51C promoter hypermethylation confer sensitivity to the PARP inhibitor rucaparib in patients with relapsed, platinum-sensitive ovarian carcinoma in ARIEL2 Part 1 , 2017 .

[25]  P. Schirmacher,et al.  Guidance Statement On BRCA1/2 Tumor Testing in Ovarian Cancer Patients. , 2017, Seminars in oncology.

[26]  D. Aoki,et al.  Genome-wide analysis of gynecologic cancer: The Cancer Genome Atlas in ovarian and endometrial cancer. , 2017, Oncology letters.

[27]  S. Shariff,et al.  Genetics Consultation Rates Following a Diagnosis of High-Grade Serous Ovarian Carcinoma in the Canadian Province of Ontario , 2016, International Journal of Gynecologic Cancer.

[28]  Ignace Vergote,et al.  Niraparib Maintenance Therapy in Platinum-Sensitive, Recurrent Ovarian Cancer. , 2016, The New England journal of medicine.

[29]  I. Vergote,et al.  PAOLA-1: An ENGOT/GCIG phase III trial of olaparib versus placebo combined with bevacizumab as maintenance treatment in patients with advanced ovarian cancer following first-line platinum-based chemotherapy plus bevacizumab. , 2016 .

[30]  G. Shapiro,et al.  Homologous Recombination Deficiency: Exploiting the Fundamental Vulnerability of Ovarian Cancer. , 2015, Cancer discovery.

[31]  Bale,et al.  Standards and Guidelines for the Interpretation of Sequence Variants: A Joint Consensus Recommendation of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics and the Association for Molecular Pathology , 2015, Genetics in Medicine.

[32]  E. Deeks Olaparib: First Global Approval , 2015, Drugs.

[33]  H. Mackay,et al.  Olaparib in patients with recurrent high-grade serous or poorly differentiated ovarian carcinoma or triple-negative breast cancer: a phase 2, multicentre, open-label, non-randomised study. , 2011, The Lancet. Oncology.

[34]  Rosalind Eeles,et al.  Association of risk-reducing surgery in BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation carriers with cancer risk and mortality. , 2010, JAMA.

[35]  Carlos Caldas,et al.  Driver mutations in TP53 are ubiquitous in high grade serous carcinoma of the ovary , 2010, The Journal of pathology.

[36]  C. Gray,et al.  PARP Inhibitor Drugs in the Treatment of Breast, Ovarian, Prostate and Pancreatic Cancers: An Update of Clinical Trials. , 2018, Current drug targets.

[37]  Marilyn M. Li,et al.  Standards and Guidelines for the Interpretation and Reporting of Sequence Variants in Cancer: A Joint Consensus Recommendation of the Association for Molecular Pathology, American Society of Clinical Oncology, and College of American Pathologists. , 2017, The Journal of molecular diagnostics : JMD.

[38]  Anne Floquet,et al.  Rucaparib in relapsed, platinum-sensitive high-grade ovarian carcinoma (ARIEL2 Part 1): an international, multicentre, open-label, phase 2 trial. , 2017, The Lancet. Oncology.

[39]  Gillian Ellisonb,et al.  Guidance Statement On BRCA 1 / 2 Tumor Testing in Ovarian Cancer Patients , 2017 .

[40]  Committee opinion no. 634: Hereditary cancer syndromes and risk assessment. , 2015, Obstetrics and gynecology.