Topographic Representation of Periodicity Information: The 2nd Neural Axis of the Auditory System

For acoustic communication the auditory system has to deal with two typical signal properties: first, many signals are embedded in noise and second, many signals are broadband harmonic sounds. Harmonic sounds, particularly voiced speech sounds and many animal communication signals, are characterized by a periodic envelope or amplitude modulation (AM). Signals with the same periodicity have the same pitch, while their fi-equency content defines their timbre. Note, that the terms 'period, periodic, or periodicity' are used here for the temporal envelope of a signal which may or may not correspond to the period of a pure tone, as in AM where each of its three firequency components may have a period differing fi-om the period of the envelope. For the auditory system periodicity is a very useful property, because in periodic sounds the same feature, for example the peak of the envelope, appears repeatedly thereby facilitating signal detection in noise. Acoustic signals may be described in the temporal as well as in the fi-equency domain. In order to imderstand the processing of complex signals by the auditory system one has to take into account that the first processing stage, the cochlea, performs a frequency analysis. From the beginning of modem hearing research this analysis was compared to a Fourier analysis (von Helmholtz, 1863). However, it turned out that the bandwidths of single

[1]  G. Langner,et al.  Topographic representation of periodicities in the forebrain of the mynah bird: one map for pitch and rhythm? , 1987, Brain Research.

[2]  Min Wu,et al.  Encoding repetition rate and duration in the inferior colliculus of the big brown bat, Eptesicus fuscus , 1991, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[3]  Gerald Langner,et al.  Orthogonal topographical representation of characteristic and best modulation frequency in the inferior colliculus of cat , 1989 .

[4]  A. Møller,et al.  Coding of amplitude and frequency modulated sounds in the cochlear nucleus of the rat. , 1972, Acta physiologica Scandinavica.

[5]  Henning Scheich,et al.  Functional Organization of Auditory Cortex in the Mongolian Gerbil (Meriones unguiculatus). I. Electrophysiological Mapping of Frequency Representation and Distinction of Fields , 1993, The European journal of neuroscience.

[6]  M. Semple,et al.  Auditory temporal processing: responses to sinusoidally amplitude-modulated tones in the inferior colliculus. , 2000, Journal of neurophysiology.

[7]  Gerald Langner,et al.  Periodicity coding in the auditory system , 1992, Hearing Research.

[8]  C. Schreiner,et al.  Periodicity coding in the inferior colliculus of the cat. II. Topographical organization. , 1988, Journal of neurophysiology.

[9]  N. Suga,et al.  Neural axis representing target range in the auditory cortex of the mustache bat. , 1979, Science.

[10]  G. Langner,et al.  Auditory cortical responses to amplitude modulations with spectra above frequency receptive fields: evidence for wide spectral integration , 1999, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[11]  D. O. Kim,et al.  Responses of DCN-PVCN neurons and auditory nerve fibers in unanesthetized decerebrate cats to AM and pure tones: Analysis with autocorrelation/power-spectrum , 1990, Hearing Research.

[12]  Gerald Langner,et al.  Ontogenic development of periodicity coding in the inferior colliculus of the mongolian gerbil , 1995 .

[13]  Robert D Frisina,et al.  Encoding of amplitude modulation in the gerbil cochlear nucleus: I. A hierarchy of enhancement , 1990, Hearing Research.

[14]  P. Heil,et al.  Frequency and periodicity are represented in orthogonal maps in the human auditory cortex: evidence from magnetoencephalography , 1997, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[15]  C. Schreiner,et al.  Periodicity coding in the inferior colliculus of the cat. I. Neuronal mechanisms. , 1988, Journal of neurophysiology.

[16]  Joshua G. W. Bernstein,et al.  Pitch discrimination of diotic and dichotic tone complexes: harmonic resolvability or harmonic number? , 2003, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[17]  G. Langner,et al.  Evidence for interactions across frequency channels in the inferior colliculus of awake chinchilla , 2002, Hearing Research.

[18]  G. Langner,et al.  Neuronal mechanisms for pitch analysis in the time domain , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[19]  Gerald Langner,et al.  Laminar fine structure of frequency organization in auditory midbrain , 1997, Nature.

[20]  G. Langner,et al.  Evidence for neuronal periodicity detection in the auditory system of the Guinea fowl: Implications for pitch analysis in the time domain , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[21]  W. S. Rhode,et al.  Encoding of amplitude modulation in the cochlear nucleus of the cat. , 1994, Journal of neurophysiology.

[22]  G. Langner,et al.  Temporal and spatial coding of periodicity information in the inferior colliculus of awake chinchilla (Chinchilla laniger) , 2002, Hearing Research.

[23]  SEDLEY TAYLOR,et al.  Die Lehre von den Tonempfindimgen , 1871, Nature.

[24]  M M Merzenich,et al.  Representation of cochlea within primary auditory cortex in the cat. , 1975, Journal of neurophysiology.

[25]  J. Licklider,et al.  A duplex theory of pitch perception , 1951, Experientia.

[26]  A. Palmer Encoding of rapid amplitude fluctuations by cochlear-nerve fibres in the guinea-pig , 1982, Archives of oto-rhino-laryngology.

[27]  G. Langner,et al.  Neural processing and representation of periodicity pitch. , 1997, Acta oto-laryngologica. Supplementum.

[28]  C. Schreiner,et al.  Modular organization of frequency integration in primary auditory cortex. , 2000, Annual review of neuroscience.

[29]  Holger Schulze,et al.  Superposition of horseshoe‐like periodicity and linear tonotopic maps in auditory cortex of the Mongolian gerbil , 2002, The European journal of neuroscience.

[30]  J. Licklider “Periodicity” Pitch and “Place” Pitch , 1954 .