Nonlinguistic auditory capabilities in aphasia

Nonlinguistic auditory capabilities were assessed through psychophysical tests in 11 left-CVA aphasic, four right-CVA nonaphasic, and eight normal male subjects selected from the same age group. The tests included frequency discrimination, gap detection, gap discrimination, frequency sweep discrimination, assessment of the magnitude of the frequency uncertainty effect in the detectability of tones in noise, and assessment of frequency selectivity through simultaneous masked thresholds. Results of these tests were compared to measures of auditory comprehension obtained from the Boston Diagnostic Aphasia Examination, the Porch Index of Communicative Ability, and the Token Test. Nonlinguistic auditory performance of the three subject groups differed significantly from each other. For the left-CVA subjects, frequency sweep discrimination, frequency discrimination, and the frequency uncertainty effect in tone-in-noise detection were the best predictors of verbal auditory comprehension. The right-CVA subjects displayed marked deficits with regard to all pitch-related tests. The findings stress the importance of considering the presence of nonlinguistic auditory dysfunctions when evaluating linguistic auditory capabilities in aphasia.

[1]  D. Kimura.  Cerebral dominance and the perception of verbal stimuli. , 1961 .

[2]  S. Abel.  Discrimination of Temporal Gaps , 1971 .

[3]  Ira Sherwin,et al.  Temporal ordering deficits following anterior temporal lobectomy , 1980, Brain and Language.

[4]  J. Murray.  The role of spatial complexity in the perception of speech and pure tones in dichotic listening , 1986, Brain and Cognition.

[5]  E. Kaplan,et al.  The assessment of aphasia and related disorders , 1972 .

[6]  E R Hafter,et al.  Uncertain-frequency detection: Cuing and condition of observation , 1980, Perception & psychophysics.

[7]  J. L. Mack,et al.  Auditory Comprehension in Aphasia , 1977 .

[8]  J R Lackner,et al.  Alterations in auditory fusion thresholds after cerebral injury in man. , 1973, Neuropsychologia.

[9]  R. Efron.  TEMPORAL PERCEPTION, APHASIA AND D'EJ'A VU. , 1963, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[10]  E. Yund,et al.  Central auditory processing IV. Ear dominance—Spatial and temporal complexity , 1983, Brain and Language.

[11]  A. Benton,et al.  Temporal discrimination in brain-damaged patients , 1966 .

[12]  D. Pisoni,et al.  Speech perception without traditional speech cues. , 1981, Science.

[13]  P. Bach-y-Rita.  Brain mechanisms in sensory substitution , 1972 .

[14]  Walter Schneider,et al.  Controlled and Automatic Human Information Processing: 1. Detection, Search, and Attention. , 1977 .

[15]  B. Moore.  Frequency difference limens for short-duration tones. , 1973, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[16]  Harold Goodglass,et al.  Phonological factors in auditory comprehension in aphasia , 1977, Neuropsychologia.

[17]  Ira J. Hirsh,et al.  Auditory Perception of Temporal Order , 1959 .

[18]  J. Desmedt,et al.  Physiological Studies of the Efferent Recurrent Auditory System , 1975 .

[19]  T. A. Karasseva.  The role of the temporal lobe in human auditory perception. , 1972, Neuropsychologia.

[20]  Richard A. Harshman,et al.  Is the left hemisphere specialized for speech, language and-or something else? , 1972 .

[21]  Richard E. Pastore,et al.  Adaptive auditory signal processing , 1971 .

[22]  E. Renzi,et al.  The token test: A sensitive test to detect receptive disturbances in aphasics. , 1962, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[23]  J. Elashoff,et al.  Multiple Regression in Behavioral Research. , 1975 .

[24]  I J Hirsh,et al.  Brain damage and the ordering of two temporally successive stimuli. , 1972, Neuropsychologia.

[25]  I J Hirsh,et al.  Some figural properties of auditory patterns. , 1978, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[26]  M. Sanders.  Handbook of Sensory Physiology , 1975 .

[27]  R. Nass,et al.  The assessment of aphasia and related disorders By Harold Goodglass and edith kaplan philadelphia, lea & febiger, 1983 illustrated, $27.50 (package) , 1984 .

[28]  P. B. Elliott,et al.  Tables of d , 1959 .

[29]  D. Shankweiler,et al.  Effects of temporal-lobe damage of perception of dichotically presented melodies. , 1966, Journal of comparative and physiological psychology.

[30]  P. Pohl.  Central auditory processing V. Ear advantages for acoustic stimuli in baboons , 1983, Brain and Language.

[31]  F. Darley.  Evaluation of appraisal techniques in speech and language pathology , 1979 .

[32]  The effect of marker variability on the discrimination of temporal intervals , 1976 .

[33]  A Carmon,et al.  Shift of ear superiority in dichotic listening to temporally patterned nonverbal stimuli. , 1973, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[34]  A. Gregory.  Ear dominance for pitch , 1982, Neuropsychologia.

[35]  Paula Tallal,et al.  Impairment of auditory perception and language comprehension in dysphasia , 1978, Brain and Language.

[36]  H. Levitt.  Transformed up-down methods in psychoacoustics. , 1971, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[37]  J A SWETS,et al.  CENTRAL FACTORS IN AUDITORY FREQUENCY SELECTIVITY. , 1963, Psychological bulletin.

[38]  R. Efron,et al.  Auditory micropattern discrimination in brain damaged subjects , 1978, Neuropsychologia.

[39]  A Carmon,et al.  Effect of unilateral brain damage on perception of temporal order. , 1971, Cortex; a journal devoted to the study of the nervous system and behavior.