http://ejbc.kr | pISSN 1738-6756 eISSN 2092-9900 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/ licenses/by-nc/4.0) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. To the Editor, Since the new cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 (CDK4/6) inhibitor drug class has steadily entered into the clinical practice following the PALOMA, MONALEESA, and MONARCH seminal trials [1], the therapeutic panorama of metastatic breast cancer (mBC) has been further enriched and complicated. While these trials have provided solid and reliable data that support the entry of these drugs into clinical practice, some issues remain. Many of the current international guidelines, such as those from the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) [2] and European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO) [3], suggest the use of CDK4/6 inhibitors for first-line treatment in postmenopausal patients with luminal mBC, except in case of visceral crisis. However, when CDK4/6 inhibitors are introduced after progression on endocrine therapy (ET) as monotherapy, it is not yet well established whether it is possible to maintain the same ET in conjunction with CDK4/6 inhibitors. Preliminary evidence suggests that CDK4/6 inhibition therapy may have the potential to reverse endocrine resistance [4], and this combination regimen would take advantage of this feature. Some preclinical evidence suggests that there is no cross-resistance among CDK4/6 inhibitors [5]. Therefore, maintaining CDK4/6 inhibition beyond progression by modifying the ET backbone may represent a future approach, but to date there are no clinical data. This issue may be addressed once results are known from the MAINTAIN (NCT02632045) [6] and TRINITI-1 (NCT02732119) [7] trials, which involve patients whose disease progressed on CDK4/6 therapy. MAINTAIN trial mandates a switch to a new ET (fulvestrant) for all patients and either additional ribociclib or placebo. The primary endpoint is progression-free survival (PFS) at 24 weeks from study entry, with a secondary endpoint of overall response rate in patients who continue CDK4/6 therapy. TRINITI-1 is a phase I/II, single-arm study of ribociclib in combination with everolimus and exemestane in patients after previous progression on a CDK4/6 inhibitor therapy. The phase II portion of this study will evaluate the clinical benefit rate at 24 weeks as a primary endpoint, and PFS as a secondary endpoint. Notably, TRINITI-1 has included men as a part of its eligible study population, thus contributing invaluable data for this particular group in whom CDK4/6 inhibitor efficacy is not well understood. One feature related to long-term exposure to CDK4/6 inhibitor treatment is activation of the Akt/mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) pathway [8]. As such, the combination of mTOR inhibitors, such as everolimus, and CDK4/6 inhibitors is of some interest in order to overcome potential resistance. However, this approach may be limited by toxicity caused by such combinations. Should the results of the TRINITI-1 trial [7] indicate efficacy of this combination in the context of patients at high risk of rapid progression, this treatment could be adopted as first-line treatment and potentially be trialled against upfront induction chemotherapy. International guidelines issued by the NCCN [2] and ESMO [3] currently recommend ET plus a CDK4/6 inhibitor as the preferred first-line treatment option in postmenopausal women with hormone receptor-positive/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HER2–) mBC, excluding those patients in whom it is necessary to induce rapid disease control. However, a direct comparison between ET plus CDK4/6 inhibitors and chemotherapy has never been performed. This comparison is of considerable importance, particularly in patients with poor prognostic factors (such as an The Open Issues Regarding Cyclin-Dependent Kinase 4/6 Inhibitors in the Management of Advanced Breast Cancer
[1]
Soo-Chin Lee,et al.
CDK4-6 inhibitors in breast cancer: current status and future development
,
2018,
Expert opinion on drug metabolism & toxicology.
[2]
N S El Saghir,et al.
4th ESO–ESMO International Consensus Guidelines for Advanced Breast Cancer (ABC 4)†
,
2018,
Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.
[3]
J. Sparano,et al.
A randomized phase II trial of fulvestrant with or without ribociclib after progression on aromatase inhibition plus cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibition in patients with unresectable or metastatic hormone receptor positive, HER2 negative breast cancer.
,
2017
.
[4]
W. Gradishar,et al.
Everolimus (EVE) plus endocrine therapy in patients with estrogen receptor–positive (ER+), human epidermal growth factor receptor 2–negative (HER2−) advanced breast cancer (BC): First- and second-line data from the BOLERO-4 study.
,
2017
.
[5]
P. Schmid,et al.
Abstract P3-03-12: CDK4/6 inhibitor resistant ER-positive cells remain dependent on estrogen signalling and retain sensitivity to endocrine therapy
,
2017
.
[6]
A. Bardia,et al.
Abstract OT2-01-05: TRINITI-1: Ribociclib + everolimus (EVE) + exemestane (EXE) triplet combination in men or postmenopausal women with HR+, HER2– advanced breast cancer (ABC) following progression on a cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK) 4/6 inhibitor
,
2017
.
[7]
A. Tutt,et al.
3rd ESO-ESMO international consensus guidelines for Advanced Breast Cancer (ABC 3).
,
2017,
Breast.
[8]
R. Finn,et al.
Efficacy and safety of palbociclib in combination with letrozole as first-line treatment of ER-positive, HER2-negative, advanced breast cancer: expanded analyses of subgroups from the randomized pivotal trial PALOMA-1/TRIO-18
,
2016,
Breast Cancer Research.
[9]
A. Toker,et al.
Inhibition of Rb Phosphorylation Leads to mTORC2-Mediated Activation of Akt.
,
2016,
Molecular cell.
[10]
E. Winer,et al.
Overcoming Therapeutic Resistance in HER2-Positive Breast Cancers with CDK4/6 Inhibitors.
,
2016,
Cancer cell.
[11]
L. Chodosh,et al.
“Braking” the Cycle of Resistance in Endocrine Therapy for Breast Cancer
,
2015,
Clinical Cancer Research.
[12]
田村 隆行.
Annual San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium に参加して
,
2011
.
[13]
Robert L. Sutherland,et al.
Cyclin D as a therapeutic target in cancer
,
2011,
Nature Reviews Cancer.