Prediction of permeability of regular scaffolds for skeletal tissue engineering: a combined computational and experimental study.

Scaffold permeability is a key parameter combining geometrical features such as pore shape, size and interconnectivity, porosity and specific surface area. It can influence the success of bone tissue engineering scaffolds, by affecting oxygen and nutrient transport, cell seeding efficiency, in vitro three-dimensional (3D) cell culture and, ultimately, the amount of bone formation. An accurate and efficient prediction of scaffold permeability would be highly useful as part of a scaffold design process. The aim of this study was (i) to determine the accuracy of computational fluid dynamics (CFD) models for prediction of the permeability coefficient of three different regular Ti6Al4V scaffolds (each having a different porosity) by comparison with experimentally measured values and (ii) to verify the validity of the semi-empirical Kozeny equation to calculate the permeability analytically. To do so, five CFD geometrical models per scaffold porosity were built, based on different geometrical inputs: either based on the scaffold's computer-aided design (CAD) or derived from 3D microfocus X-ray computed tomography (micro-CT) data of the additive manufactured (AM) scaffolds. For the latter the influence of the spatial image resolution and the image analysis algorithm used to determine the scaffold's architectural features on the predicted permeability was analysed. CFD models based on high-resolution micro-CT images could predict the permeability coefficients of the studied scaffolds: depending on scaffold porosity and image analysis algorithm, relative differences between measured and predicted permeability values were between 2% and 27%. Finally, the analytical Kozeny equation was found to be valid. A linear correlation between the ratio Φ(3)/S(s)(2) and the permeability coefficient k was found for the predicted (by means of CFD) as well as measured values (relative difference of 16.4% between respective Kozeny coefficients), thus resulting in accurate and efficient calculation of the permeability of regular AM scaffolds.

[1]  K. Popat,et al.  Bone tissue engineering: A review in bone biomimetics and drug delivery strategies , 2009, Biotechnology progress.

[2]  P. Layrolle,et al.  Macroporous biphasic calcium phosphate scaffold with high permeability/porosity ratio. , 2003, Tissue engineering.

[3]  Esmaiel Jabbari,et al.  Fabrication and characterization of poly(propylene fumarate) scaffolds with controlled pore structures using 3-dimensional printing and injection molding. , 2006, Tissue engineering.

[4]  Jan Schrooten,et al.  A computational tool for the upscaling of regular scaffolds during in vitro perfusion culture. , 2011, Tissue engineering. Part C, Methods.

[5]  M Ding,et al.  Accuracy of cancellous bone volume fraction measured by micro-CT scanning. , 1999, Journal of biomechanics.

[6]  Donald W. Taylor,et al.  Fundamentals of soil mechanics , 1948 .

[7]  Boming Yu,et al.  Analysis of Flow in Fractal Porous Media , 2008 .

[8]  P. Leung,et al.  Fluid conductance of cancellous bone graft as a predictor for graft-host interface healing. , 1996, Journal of biomechanics.

[9]  J. Kärger,et al.  Flow and Transport in Porous Media and Fractured Rock , 1996 .

[10]  L. Bonassar,et al.  Direct perfusion measurements of cancellous bone anisotropic permeability. , 2001, Journal of biomechanics.

[11]  T. M. Keaveny,et al.  Dependence of Intertrabecular Permeability on Flow Direction and Anatomic Site , 1999, Annals of Biomedical Engineering.

[12]  P Rüegsegger,et al.  Resolution dependency of microstructural properties of cancellous bone based on three-dimensional mu-tomography. , 1996, Technology and health care : official journal of the European Society for Engineering and Medicine.

[13]  A. Caplan,et al.  Osteogenesis in Marrow-Derived Mesenchymal Cell Porous Ceramic Composites Transplanted Subcutaneously: Effect of Fibronectin and Laminin on Cell Retention and Rate of Osteogenic Expression , 1992, Cell transplantation.

[14]  Robert E Guldberg,et al.  Microarchitectural and mechanical characterization of oriented porous polymer scaffolds. , 2003, Biomaterials.

[15]  F. Maes,et al.  Modeling fluid flow through irregular scaffolds for perfusion bioreactors , 2009, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[16]  P Rüegsegger,et al.  Micro-CT examinations of trabecular bone samples at different resolutions: 14, 7 and 2 micron level. , 1998, Technology and health care : official journal of the European Society for Engineering and Medicine.

[17]  E. Wintermantel,et al.  Ceramic TiO2-foams: characterisation of a potential scaffold , 2004 .

[18]  Dietmar Werner Hutmacher,et al.  State of the art and future directions of scaffold‐based bone engineering from a biomaterials perspective , 2007, Journal of tissue engineering and regenerative medicine.

[19]  Jos Vander Sloten,et al.  Micro-CT-based screening of biomechanical and structural properties of bone tissue engineering scaffolds , 2006, Medical and Biological Engineering and Computing.

[20]  P. Rüegsegger,et al.  A new method for the model‐independent assessment of thickness in three‐dimensional images , 1997 .

[21]  J. Schrooten,et al.  Validation of x-ray microfocus computed tomography as an imaging tool for porous structures. , 2008, The Review of scientific instruments.

[22]  Paolo Giannoni,et al.  A tissue engineering approach to bone repair in large animal models and in clinical practice. , 2007, Biomaterials.

[23]  Scott J. Hollister,et al.  Computational design of tissue engineering scaffolds , 2007 .

[24]  Helder C. Rodrigues,et al.  Multiscale modeling of bone tissue with surface and permeability control , 2011 .

[25]  Dietmar W Hutmacher,et al.  A comparison of micro CT with other techniques used in the characterization of scaffolds. , 2006, Biomaterials.

[26]  V. Pandolfelli,et al.  Prediction of ceramic foams permeability using Ergun's equation , 1999 .

[27]  J. Kruth,et al.  Micro-CT-based improvement of geometrical and mechanical controllability of selective laser melted Ti6Al4V porous structures , 2011 .

[28]  Cato T Laurencin,et al.  Tissue engineered bone: measurement of nutrient transport in three-dimensional matrices. , 2003, Journal of biomedical materials research. Part A.

[29]  P. Carman,et al.  Flow of gases through porous media , 1956 .

[30]  B. Hallgrímsson,et al.  Comparison of Microcomputed Tomographic and Microradiographic Measurements of Cortical Bone Porosity , 2004, Calcified Tissue International.

[31]  Scott J Hollister,et al.  Three-dimensional poly(1,8-octanediol-co-citrate) scaffold pore shape and permeability effects on sub-cutaneous in vivo chondrogenesis using primary chondrocytes. , 2011, Acta biomaterialia.

[32]  J M García-Aznar,et al.  On scaffold designing for bone regeneration: A computational multiscale approach. , 2009, Acta biomaterialia.

[33]  L. Gibson,et al.  The effect of pore size on cell adhesion in collagen-GAG scaffolds. , 2005, Biomaterials.

[34]  Daniel Berckmans,et al.  Bi-modular flow characterization in tissue engineering scaffolds using computational fluid dynamics and particle imaging velocimetry. , 2010, Tissue engineering. Part C, Methods.

[35]  Scott J Hollister,et al.  Mechanical, permeability, and degradation properties of 3D designed poly(1,8 octanediol-co-citrate) scaffolds for soft tissue engineering. , 2010, Journal of biomedical materials research. Part B, Applied biomaterials.

[36]  M. Birch,et al.  Microcellular polyHIPE polymer supports osteoblast growth and bone formation in vitro. , 2004, Biomaterials.

[37]  E. Ferrié,et al.  Characterization of the structure and permeability of titanium foams for spinal fusion devices. , 2009, Acta biomaterialia.

[38]  Dominique Bernard,et al.  Non-destructive quantitative 3D analysis for the optimisation of tissue scaffolds. , 2007, Biomaterials.

[39]  Frank Luyten,et al.  Controlled cell-seeding methodologies: a first step toward clinically relevant bone tissue engineering strategies. , 2010, Tissue engineering. Part C, Methods.