Home Video Visual Quality Assessment

Compared with the video programs taken by profes- sionals, home videos are always with low quality content resulted from non-professional capture skills. In this paper, we present a novel spatiotemporal quality assessment scheme in terms of low-level content features for home videos. In contrast to ex- isting frame-level-based quality assessment approaches, a type of temporal segment of video, subshot, is selected as the basic unit for quality assessment. A set of spatiotemporal visual artifacts, regarded as the key factors affecting the overall perceived quality (i.e., unstableness and jerkiness as temporal factors; infidelity, blurring, brightness, and orientation as spatial factors), are mined from each subshot based on particular characteristics of home videos. The relationship between the overall quality metric and these factors are exploited by three different methods, including user study-based, rule-based and learning-based. To validate the proposed scheme, we present a scalable quality-based home video summarization system from a novel perspective—achieving the best visual quality while simultaneously preserving the most informative content. A comparison user study between this system and the attention model-based video skimming approach demonstrated the effectiveness of the proposed quality assessment scheme.

[1]  Darrell Whitley,et al.  A genetic algorithm tutorial , 1994, Statistics and Computing.

[2]  Shingo Uchihashi,et al.  A semi-automatic approach to home video editing , 2000, UIST '00.

[3]  Vladimir N. Vapnik,et al.  The Nature of Statistical Learning Theory , 2000, Statistics for Engineering and Information Science.

[4]  Hyung-Myung Kim,et al.  Efficient camera motion characterization for MPEG video indexing , 2000, 2000 IEEE International Conference on Multimedia and Expo. ICME2000. Proceedings. Latest Advances in the Fast Changing World of Multimedia (Cat. No.00TH8532).

[5]  James Hu,et al.  DVQ: A digital video quality metric based on human vision , 2001 .

[6]  HongJiang Zhang,et al.  A user attention model for video summarization , 2002, MULTIMEDIA '02.

[7]  Mohan S. Kankanhalli,et al.  Detection and removal of lighting & shaking artifacts in home videos , 2002, MULTIMEDIA '02.

[8]  Mingjing Li,et al.  Boosting image orientation detection with indoor vs. outdoor classification , 2002, Sixth IEEE Workshop on Applications of Computer Vision, 2002. (WACV 2002). Proceedings..

[9]  Alan C. Bovik,et al.  41 OBJECTIVE VIDEO QUALITY ASSESSMENT , 2003 .

[10]  Deepak S. Turaga,et al.  No reference PSNR estimation for compressed pictures , 2004, Signal Process. Image Commun..

[11]  Hanghang Tong,et al.  Blur detection for digital images using wavelet transform , 2004, 2004 IEEE International Conference on Multimedia and Expo (ICME) (IEEE Cat. No.04TH8763).

[12]  Lie Lu,et al.  Optimization-based automated home video editing system , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology.

[13]  Zhou Wang,et al.  Video quality assessment based on structural distortion measurement , 2004, Signal Process. Image Commun..

[14]  HongJiang Zhang,et al.  Video Snapshot: A Bird View of Video Sequence , 2005, 11th International Multimedia Modelling Conference.

[15]  Si Wu,et al.  Video quality classification based home video segmentation , 2005, 2005 IEEE International Conference on Multimedia and Expo.

[16]  Atreyi Kankanhalli,et al.  Automatic partitioning of full-motion video , 1993, Multimedia Systems.

[17]  Lie Lu,et al.  A generic framework of user attention model and its application in video summarization , 2005, IEEE Trans. Multim..

[18]  Wei-Ying Ma,et al.  Learning No-Reference Quality Metric by Examples , 2005, 11th International Multimedia Modelling Conference.

[19]  Weisi Lin,et al.  Modeling visual attention's modulatory aftereffects on visual sensitivity and quality evaluation , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.