Performance and emissions of a CRDI diesel engine fuelled with swine lard methyl esters–diesel mixture

Abstract Biodiesel, as a product of the transesterification reaction of fatty material, is gaining appreciation all over the world and confirms its beneficial effect on the reduction of exhaust gases when (even partly) used to power compression-ignition engines. Although many researchers have focused on biofuel production and its application in combustion engines, continuous development of injection systems, providing new control strategies, encourages the seeking for new ways of optimizing biofuel combustion. In particular, very little attention has been given to the possibility of using biofuels in modern CRDI (Common Rail Direct Injection) engines with divided injection technology. There is also limited information available on engines operating on biodiesel of animal origin and their performance and emissions for such fuels. Because of this gap of knowledge, in the present study, the authors focused on analysing the phenomena of combustion of animal-origin biodiesel mixtures in a CRDI engine. Swine lard methyl esters, obtained in the laboratory by a single-step alkali transesterification process as a biocomponent, and mineral diesel were used to obtain B25, B50, B75 mixtures (25%, 50% and 75% of biocomponent concentration by volume). The physicochemical parameters of B25, B50, B75, pure esters and mineral diesel were examined to determine whether the fuels met quality standards. The mixtures were used to fuel a 2.6 L Andoria CRDI engine placed on a dynamometer test stand. Tests were carried out in steady state operation, at rotational speeds when two different injection strategies occur (single injection and two subsequent injections), also different load conditions were introduced during tests. During the tests, engine performance and exhaust gas emissions were measured and analysed in detail. The study has confirmed the capability of using diesel–biodiesel mixtures containing up to 75% biocomponents in a modern CRDI engine without any operational issues. A minor deterioration of fuel performance parameters with an increasing biodiesel share has been observed. Brake-specific fuel consumption increased on average by 3.2%, 8.5% and 13.8% for B25, B50 and B75, respectively. An average reduction of brake fuel conversion efficiency was observed, amounting to 1.6%, 4.8% and 7.8% for B25, B50 and B75, respectively. Significant reduction of exhaust gas emissions (excluding NO x ) and opacity was also observed in all examined operation conditions. Total hydrocarbon concentration was reduced by a maximum of 72% for the B75 mixture for a speed of 1500 RPM and 100 Nm load. The best emission performance was observed for operation conditions when a short pre-injection occurred early in the compression phase, before the main fuel injection. This has proven that advanced injection strategies can be applied to fuel mixtures with high biodiesel share, especially for low engine load conditions.

[1]  Sławomir Wierzbicki,et al.  The effect of diesel-biodiesel blends on the performance and exhaust emissions of a direct injection off-road diesel engine , 2014 .

[2]  Haji Hassan Masjuki,et al.  Non-edible vegetable oils: A critical evaluation of oil extraction, fatty acid compositions, biodiesel production, characteristics, engine performance and emissions production , 2013 .

[3]  Maciej Mikulski,et al.  Effect of doping diesel oil with methyl esters on physicochemical properties of the obtained fuel, in the aspect of its exploitation potential , 2014 .

[4]  J. Cvengroš,et al.  Vegetable oils and animal fats as alternative fuels for diesel engines with dual fuel operation , 2011 .

[5]  Robert L. McCormick,et al.  Combustion of fat and vegetable oil derived fuels in diesel engines , 1998 .

[6]  Haji Hassan Masjuki,et al.  A study on the effects of promising edible and non-edible biodiesel feedstocks on engine performance and emissions production: A comparative evaluation , 2013 .

[7]  Olivera S. Stamenković,et al.  Waste animal fats as feedstocks for biodiesel production , 2014 .

[8]  Haji Hassan Masjuki,et al.  An investigation of the engine performance, emissions and combustion characteristics of coconut biodiesel in a high-pressure common-rail diesel engine , 2014 .

[9]  C. Martins,et al.  Experimental analysis of a diesel engine operating in Diesel–Ethanol Dual-Fuel mode , 2014 .

[10]  Rasim Behçet,et al.  Performance and emission study of waste anchovy fish biodiesel in a diesel engine , 2011 .

[11]  Maciej Mikulski,et al.  THE CONCEPT AND CONSTRUCTION OF THE ENGINE TEST BED FOR EXPERIMENTS WITH A MULTI-FUEL CI ENGINE FED WITH CNG AND LIQUID FUEL AS AN IGNITION DOSE , 2015 .

[12]  Elizabeth Funmilayo Aransiola,et al.  A review of current technology for biodiesel production: State of the art , 2014 .

[13]  Ali M.A. Attia,et al.  Influence of the structure of water-in-fuel emulsion on diesel engine performance , 2014 .

[14]  James Pullen,et al.  Factors affecting biodiesel engine performance and exhaust emissions – Part II: Experimental study , 2014 .

[15]  L. Ntziachristos,et al.  Biodiesel blend effects on common-rail diesel combustion and emissions , 2010 .

[16]  Haji Hassan Masjuki,et al.  A comprehensive review on biodiesel as an alternative energy resource and its characteristics , 2012 .

[17]  Grzegorz Koszalka,et al.  Model of operational changes in the combustion chamber tightness of a diesel engine , 2014 .

[18]  Balaji Mohan,et al.  Fuel injection strategies for performance improvement and emissions reduction in compression ignition engines—A review , 2013 .

[19]  M. C. Gutiérrez,et al.  Application of the factorial design of experiments to biodiesel production from lard , 2009 .

[20]  A. Dhar,et al.  Effect of fuel injection pressure on diesel particulate size and number distribution in a CRDI single cylinder research engine , 2013 .

[21]  R. Ballesteros,et al.  Carbonyl emission and toxicity profile of diesel blends with an animal-fat biodiesel and a tire pyrolysis liquid fuel. , 2014, Chemosphere.

[22]  Arántzazu Gómez,et al.  Comparative study of pollutant emissions from engine starting with animal fat biodiesel and GTL fuels , 2013 .

[23]  Jonas Matijošius,et al.  The exploitation and environmental characteristics of diesel fuel containing rapeseed butyl esters , 2013 .

[24]  A. Domínguez-Sáez,et al.  Effects of animal fat based biodiesel on a TDI diesel engine performance, combustion characteristics and particle number and size distribution emissions , 2014 .

[25]  Andrzej Piętak,et al.  On the modeling of pilot dose ignition delay in a dual-fuel, self ignition engine , 2011 .

[26]  I. M. Rizwanul Fattah,et al.  Production and comparison of fuel properties, engine performance, and emission characteristics of biodiesel from various non-edible vegetable oils: A review , 2014 .

[27]  Ş. Altun,et al.  Biodiesel production from inedible animal tallow and an experimental investigation of its use as alternative fuel in a direct injection diesel engine , 2009 .

[28]  M. M. Roy,et al.  Performance and emissions of a diesel engine fueled by biodiesel-diesel, biodiesel-diesel-additive and kerosene-biodiesel blends. , 2014 .

[29]  G. Nagarajan,et al.  Comparative analysis of performance, emission and combustion parameters of diesel engine fuelled with ethyl ester of fish oil and its diesel blends , 2014 .

[30]  Gvidonas Labeckas,et al.  The effect of ethanol–diesel–biodiesel blends on combustion, performance and emissions of a direct injection diesel engine , 2014 .

[31]  Jai Gopal Gupta,et al.  Effect of fuel injection pressure and injection timing on spray characteristics and particulate size–number distribution in a biodiesel fuelled common rail direct injection diesel engine , 2014 .

[32]  D.John Panneer Selvam,et al.  Performance and Emission Analysis of DI Diesel Engine Fuelled with Methyl Esters of Beef Tallow and Diesel Blends , 2012 .

[33]  Ahmad Muhsin Ithnin,et al.  An overview of utilizing water-in-diesel emulsion fuel in diesel engine and its potential research study , 2014 .

[34]  I. M. Atadashi,et al.  High quality biodiesel and its diesel engine application: A review , 2010 .

[35]  Sundararajan Rajkumar,et al.  Multi-zone phenomenological model of combustion and emission characteristics and parametric investigations for split injections and multiple injections in common-rail direct-injection diesel engines , 2015 .

[36]  Cherng-Yuan Lin,et al.  Engine performance and emission characteristics of marine fish-oil biodiesel produced from the discarded parts of marine fish , 2009 .

[37]  Avinash Kumar Agarwal,et al.  Effect of fuel injection pressure and injection timing of Karanja biodiesel blends on fuel spray, engine performance, emissions and combustion characteristics , 2015 .

[38]  L. Das,et al.  Process optimization for biodiesel production from Jatropha, Karanja and Polanga oils , 2009 .

[39]  James Pullen,et al.  Factors affecting biodiesel engine performance and exhaust emissions – Part I: Review , 2014 .

[40]  Lin Lin,et al.  Opportunities and challenges for biodiesel fuel , 2011 .

[41]  Varun,et al.  Performance and emission characteristics of biodiesel from different origins: A review , 2013 .

[42]  Gholamhassan Najafi,et al.  Current biodiesel production technologies: A comparative review , 2012 .

[43]  Guanyi Chen,et al.  Biodiesel production from waste cooking oil via alkali catalyst and its engine test , 2008 .