Cognitive sensor networks for structure defect monitoring and classification using guided wave signals

This paper develops a framework of a cognitive sensor networks system for structure defect monitoring and classification using guided wave signals. Guided ultrasonic waves that can propagate long distances along civil structures have been widely studied for inspection and detection of structure damage. Smart ultrasonic sensors arranged as a spatially distributed cognitive sensor networks system can transmit and receive ultrasonic guided waves to interrogate structure defects such as cracks and corrosion. A distinguishing characteristic of the cognitive sensor networks system is that it adaptively probes and learns about the environment, which enables constant optimization in response to its changing understanding of the defect response. In this paper, we develop a sequential multiple hypothesis testing scheme combined with adaptive waveform transmission for defect monitoring and classification. The performance is verified using numerical simulations of guided elastic wave propagation on a pipe model and by Monte Carlo simulations for computing the probability of correct classification.

[1]  Hoon Sohn,et al.  Utilizing the sequential probability ratio test for building joint monitoring , 2002, SPIE Smart Structures and Materials + Nondestructive Evaluation and Health Monitoring.

[2]  J.P. Lynch,et al.  A Parallel Simulated Annealing Architecture for Model Updating in Wireless Sensor Networks , 2009, IEEE Sensors Journal.

[3]  R. Khan,et al.  Sequential Tests of Statistical Hypotheses. , 1972 .

[4]  José M. F. Moura,et al.  Time-Reversal Detection Using Antenna Arrays , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing.

[5]  Paul D. Wilcox,et al.  Mode and Transducer Selection for Long Range Lamb Wave Inspection , 1999 .

[6]  Kevin Curran,et al.  Cognitive Radio , 2008, Comput. Inf. Sci..

[7]  Takahiro Hayashi,et al.  Defect imaging with guided waves in a pipe. , 2005, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[8]  A. G. Roosenbrand,et al.  The reflection of the fundamental torsional mode from cracks and notches in pipes. , 2003, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[9]  Mark R. Bell Information theory and radar waveform design , 1993, IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory.

[10]  Peter Swerling,et al.  Sequential detection in radar with multiple resolution elements , 1962, IRE Trans. Inf. Theory.

[11]  M.A. Neifeld,et al.  Adaptive Waveform Design and Sequential Hypothesis Testing for Target Recognition With Active Sensors , 2007, IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Signal Processing.

[12]  José M. F. Moura,et al.  Detection by Time Reversal: Single Antenna , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing.

[13]  Simon Haykin,et al.  Cognitive radio: brain-empowered wireless communications , 2005, IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications.

[14]  J. S. Goldstein,et al.  Full-polarization matched-illumination for target detection and identification , 2002 .

[15]  Nicholas O'Donoughue,et al.  Time Reversal in Multiple-Input Multiple-Output Radar , 2010, IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Signal Processing.

[16]  M. Lowe,et al.  The Reflection of Guided Waves From Circumferential Notches in Pipes , 1998 .

[17]  K. Worden,et al.  STATISTICAL DAMAGE CLASSIFICATION USING SEQUENTIAL PROBABILITY RATIO TESTS. , 2002 .

[18]  Edoardo Mosca Probing signal design for linear channel identification , 1972, IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory.

[19]  J. J. Bussgang Sequential methods in radar detection , 1970 .

[20]  S. Haykin,et al.  Cognitive radar: a way of the future , 2006, IEEE Signal Processing Magazine.

[21]  Joel B. Harley,et al.  Single Antenna Time Reversal of Guided Waves in Pipelines , 2009 .

[22]  Chun H. Wang,et al.  A synthetic time-reversal imaging method for structural health monitoring , 2004 .

[23]  Venugopal V. Veeravalli,et al.  A sequential procedure for multihypothesis testing , 1994, IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory.

[24]  L. Scharf,et al.  Statistical Signal Processing: Detection, Estimation, and Time Series Analysis , 1991 .

[25]  J. Rose Ultrasonic Waves in Solid Media , 1999 .

[26]  P. Armitage Sequential Analysis with More than Two Alternative Hypotheses, and its Relation to Discriminant Function Analysis , 1950 .

[27]  M. W. Vanik,et al.  PROBABILISTIC APPROACH TO STRUCTURAL HEALTH MONITORING , 2000 .

[28]  J. Li,et al.  Excitation and propagation of non-axisymmetric guided waves in a hollow cylinder. , 2001, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[29]  Jerome P. Lynch,et al.  Sensor technology innovation for the advancement of structural health monitoring: a strategic program of US-China research for the next decade , 2007 .

[30]  D. Gazis Three‐Dimensional Investigation of the Propagation of Waves in Hollow Circular Cylinders. I. Analytical Foundation , 1959 .

[31]  John G. Proakis,et al.  Digital Signal Processing: Principles, Algorithms, and Applications , 1992 .

[32]  Shi-Chang Wooh,et al.  Optimum beam steering of linear phased arrays , 1999 .

[33]  Victor Giurgiutiu,et al.  Single Mode Tuning Effects on Lamb Wave Time Reversal with Piezoelectric Wafer Active Sensors for Structural Health Monitoring , 2007 .

[34]  B. Khuri-Yakub,et al.  Capacitive micromachined ultrasonic transducers: next-generation arrays for acoustic imaging? , 2002, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[35]  Jerome Peter Lynch,et al.  An overview of wireless structural health monitoring for civil structures , 2007, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.