Robustness Through Regime Flips in Collapsing Ecological Networks

There has been considerable progress in our perception of organized complexity in recent years. Recurrent debates on the dynamics and stability of complex systems have provided several insights, but it is very difficult to find identifiable patterns in the relationship between complex network structure and dynamics. Traditionally an arena for theoreticians, much of this research has been invigorated by demonstration of alternate stable states in real world ecosystems such as lakes, coral reefs, forests and grasslands. In this work, we use topological connectivity attributes of eighty six ecological networks and link these with random and targeted perturbations, to obtain general patterns of behaviour of complex real world systems. We have analyzed the response of each ecological network to individual, grouped and cascading extinctions, and the results suggest that most networks are robust to loss of specialists until specific thresholds are reached in terms of network geodesics. If the extinctions persist beyond these thresholds, a state change or ‘flip’ occurs and the structural properties are altered drastically, although the network does not collapse. As opposed to simpler or smaller networks, we find larger networks to contain multiple states that may in turn, ensure long-term persistence, suggesting that complexity can endow resilience to ecosystems. The concept of critical transitions in ecological networks and the implications of these findings for complex systems characterized by networks are likely to be profound with immediate significance for ecosystem conservation, invasion biology and restoration ecology.

[1]  John Doyle,et al.  Complexity and robustness , 2001, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[2]  J. Sutherland,et al.  Multiple Stable Points in Natural Communities , 1974, The American Naturalist.

[3]  Jane Memmott,et al.  Tolerance of pollination networks to species extinctions , 2004, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[4]  P. Shannon,et al.  Cytoscape: a software environment for integrated models of biomolecular interaction networks. , 2003, Genome research.

[5]  S. Carpenter,et al.  Early-warning signals for critical transitions , 2009, Nature.

[6]  Gitanjali Yadav,et al.  NEXCADE: Perturbation Analysis for Complex Networks , 2012, PloS one.

[7]  George Sugihara,et al.  Complex systems: Cooperative network dynamics , 2009, Nature.

[8]  Lian Pin Koh,et al.  Species Coextinctions and the Biodiversity Crisis , 2004, Science.

[9]  Jordi Bascompte,et al.  The ecological consequences of complex topology and nested structure in pollination webs. , 2006 .

[10]  John Harte,et al.  Response of complex food webs to realistic extinction sequences. , 2007, Ecology.

[11]  M. Pascual,et al.  Ecological networks : Linking structure to dynamics in food webs , 2006 .

[12]  Werner Ulrich,et al.  A consistent metric for nestedness analysis in ecological systems: reconciling concept and measurement , 2008 .

[13]  Jennifer A Dunne,et al.  Cascading extinctions and community collapse in model food webs , 2009, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[14]  Lian Pin Koh,et al.  The sixth mass coextinction: are most endangered species parasites and mutualists? , 2009, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[15]  George Sugihara,et al.  Complex systems: Ecology for bankers , 2008, Nature.

[16]  J. Diamond The present, past and future of human-caused extinctions. , 1989, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[17]  Albert-László Barabási,et al.  Error and attack tolerance of complex networks , 2000, Nature.

[18]  Carsten F. Dormann,et al.  Indices, Graphs and Null Models: Analyzing Bipartite Ecological Networks , 2009 .

[19]  Gábor Csárdi,et al.  The igraph software package for complex network research , 2006 .

[20]  Jordi Bascompte,et al.  The architecture of mutualistic networks minimizes competition and increases biodiversity , 2009, Nature.

[21]  R. Solé,et al.  Ecological networks and their fragility , 2006, Nature.

[22]  Paulo Guimarães,et al.  Improving the analyses of nestedness for large sets of matrices , 2006, Environ. Model. Softw..

[23]  Jordi Bascompte,et al.  Asymmetric Coevolutionary Networks Facilitate Biodiversity Maintenance , 2006, Science.

[24]  Carter T. Butts,et al.  Social Network Analysis with sna , 2008 .