Investigating the Microstructure of Network Evolution: Alliance Formation in the Mobile Communications Industry

Theories of network evolution frequently focus on “network endogeneity,” which stresses predictable, path-dependent evolution rooted in previous network structure. However, theories of technological evolution and innovation remind us that networks may undergo significant change as technological discontinuities exert pressures on existing relationships and firms engage in exploratory search. How can we incorporate sources of change into our theories of network evolution instead of focusing so squarely on sources of inertia? By using recent advances in graph theory, we develop a more flexible theory of network evolution by examining two patterns of partner selection that have the potential to change networks: “shortcut” formation between relatively unconnected partner clusters, and the entry of new firms into the “main component” of incumbent partners. Our findings suggest an important contingency for the endogeneity perspective: structural homophily predicts shortcut formation but not alliance formation within clusters. Furthermore, we demonstrate that the pattern of alliance formation between incumbents and new entrants to the alliance network is driven by a combination of endogenous and exogenous mechanisms. New entrants attach to more prominent incumbents, but they are more likely to attach with an alliance deal that comprises multiple partners. We demonstrate these findings in an industry where systemic technology encourages cooperation and where network entry is prevalent---the mobile communications industry from 1993--2002.

[1]  Van Den,et al.  The ecology of technology : the co-evolution of technology and organization , 2010 .

[2]  Balaji R. Koka,et al.  Networks in transition : How industry events (re)shape interfirm relationships , 1998 .

[3]  W. Baker Market Networks and Corporate Behavior , 1990, American Journal of Sociology.

[4]  Damon J. Phillips,et al.  Middle‐Status Conformity: Theoretical Restatement and Empirical Demonstration in Two Markets1 , 2001, American Journal of Sociology.

[5]  G. Ahuja The duality of collaboration : Inducements and opportunities in the formation of interfirm linkages , 2000 .

[6]  Dean M. Behrens,et al.  Redundant governance structures: an analysis of structural and relational embeddedness in the steel and semiconductor industries , 2000 .

[7]  Damon J. Phillips,et al.  The Dynamics of Organizational Status , 1996 .

[8]  Reka Albert,et al.  Mean-field theory for scale-free random networks , 1999 .

[9]  W. Powell,et al.  Network Dynamics and Field Evolution: The Growth of Interorganizational Collaboration in the Life Sciences1 , 2005, American Journal of Sociology.

[10]  Joel A. C. Baum,et al.  Where Do Small Worlds Come From? , 2003 .

[11]  M. Tushman,et al.  On the Organizational Determinants of Technological Change: Towards a Sociology of Technological Evolution , 1992 .

[12]  B. Kogut Joint ventures: Theoretical and empirical perspectives , 1988 .

[13]  Gary P. Pisano,et al.  Intel Corporation: 1968-1997 , 1997 .

[14]  R. Burt The Network Structure Of Social Capital , 2000 .

[15]  Pamela R. Haunschild,et al.  Friends or Strangers? Firm-Specific Uncertainty, Market Uncertainty, and Network Partner Selection , 2004, Organ. Sci..

[16]  Toby E. Stuart,et al.  A Role-Based Ecology of Technological Change , 1995, American Journal of Sociology.

[17]  D. Watts Networks, Dynamics, and the Small‐World Phenomenon1 , 1999, American Journal of Sociology.

[18]  B. Kogut,et al.  Social Capital, Structural Holes and the Formation of an Industry Network , 1997 .

[19]  Shin-Kap Han Mimetic Isomorphism and Its Effect on the Audit Services Market , 1994 .

[20]  R. Burt Social Contagion and Innovation: Cohesion versus Structural Equivalence , 1987, American Journal of Sociology.

[21]  D. Teece,et al.  DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES AND STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT , 1997 .

[22]  Harbir Singh,et al.  Complementarity, status similarity and social capital as drivers of alliance formation , 2000 .

[23]  Joel Podolny Market Uncertainty and the Social Character of Economic Exchange , 1994 .

[24]  Toby E. Stuart Interorganizational alliances and the performance of firms: A study of growth and innovation rates i , 2000 .

[25]  Joel Podolny A Status-Based Model of Market Competition , 1993, American Journal of Sociology.

[26]  W. Mitchell,et al.  Structural homophily or social asymmetry? The formation of alliances by poorly embedded firms , 2009 .

[27]  Vladimir Batagelj,et al.  Exploratory Social Network Analysis with Pajek , 2005 .

[28]  Andrew Hargadon,et al.  TECHNOLOGY BROKERING AND INNOVATION: EVIDENCE FROM A PRODUCT DESIGN FIRM. , 1996 .

[29]  M. Tushman,et al.  Technological Discontinuities and Dominant Designs: A Cyclical Model of Technological Change , 1990 .

[30]  R. Gulati,et al.  The Architecture of Cooperation: Managing Coordination Costs and Appropriation Concerns in Strategic Alliances , 1998 .

[31]  David B. Yoffie,et al.  Competing in the Age of Digital Convergence , 1997 .

[32]  N. Nohria,et al.  Global strategic linkages and industry structure , 1991 .

[33]  Andrew B. Hargadon,et al.  Technology brokering and innovation in a product development firm. , 1997 .

[34]  Varghese P. George,et al.  From the Bottom Up? Technical Committee Activity and Alliance Formation , 2001 .

[35]  Corey C. Phelps,et al.  Interfirm Collaboration Networks: The Impact of Large-Scale Network Structure on Firm Innovation , 2007, Manag. Sci..

[36]  B. Uzzi,et al.  Collaboration and Creativity: The Small World Problem1 , 2005, American Journal of Sociology.

[37]  R. Gulati Social Structure and Alliance Formation Patterns: A Longitudinal Analysis , 1995 .

[38]  Downloaded from , 1997 .

[39]  J. Coleman,et al.  Social Capital in the Creation of Human Capital , 1988, American Journal of Sociology.

[40]  James B. Wade Dynamics of organizational communities and technological bandwagons: An empirical investigation of community evolution in the microprocessor market , 1995 .

[41]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  ABSORPTIVE CAPACITY: A NEW PERSPECTIVE ON LEARNING AND INNOVATION , 1990 .

[42]  P. Arabie,et al.  An algorithm for clustering relational data with applications to social network analysis and comparison with multidimensional scaling , 1975 .

[43]  Atul Nerkar,et al.  On the Complexity of Technological Evolution: Exploring Coevolution within and across Hierarchical Levels in Optical Disc Technology , 1999 .

[44]  Kim B. Clark,et al.  Architectural Innovation: The Reconfiguration of Existing Product Technologies and the Failure of , 1990 .

[45]  M. Mizruchi Cohesion, equivalence, and similarity of behavior: a theoretical and empirical assessment , 1993 .

[46]  P. Bonacich Power and Centrality: A Family of Measures , 1987, American Journal of Sociology.

[47]  A. Zaheer,et al.  Bridging ties: a source of firm heterogeneity in competitive capabilities , 1999 .

[48]  Mohanbir Sawhney,et al.  Innovation and Virtual Environments: Towards Virtual Knowledge Brokers , 2006 .

[49]  Mary Tripsas UNRAVELING THE PROCESS OF CREATIVE DESTRUCTION: COMPLEMENTARY ASSETS AND INCUMBENT SURVIVAL IN THE TYPESETTER INDUSTRY: UNRAVELING THE PROCESS OF CREATIVE DESTRUCTION , 1997 .

[50]  Toby E. Stuart,et al.  Syndication Networks and the Spatial Distribution of Venture Capital Investments1 , 1999, American Journal of Sociology.

[51]  Melissa A. Schilling Technological Lockout: An Integrative Model of the Economic and Strategic Factors Driving Technology Success and Failure , 1998 .

[52]  Patricia E. Tweet Brokerage and Closure: An Introduction to Social Capital , 2006 .

[53]  Toby E. Stuart Network Positions and Propensities to Collaborate: An Investigation of Strategic Alliance Formation in a High-Technology Industry , 1998 .

[54]  Duncan J. Watts,et al.  Collective dynamics of ‘small-world’ networks , 1998, Nature.

[55]  W. Powell,et al.  Interorganizational Collaboration and the Locus of Innovation: Networks of Learning in Biotechnology. , 1996 .

[56]  W. Raub,et al.  Reputation and Efficiency in Social Interactions: An Example of Network Effects , 1990, American Journal of Sociology.

[57]  M. Newman,et al.  Random graphs with arbitrary degree distributions and their applications. , 2000, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[58]  Nataša Golubovi,et al.  NETWORK STRUCTURE OF SOCIAL CAPITAL , 2010 .

[59]  A. Nerkar,et al.  Beyond local search: boundary‐spanning, exploration, and impact in the optical disk industry , 2001 .

[60]  D. North Competing Technologies , Increasing Returns , and Lock-In by Historical Events , 1994 .

[61]  R. Gulati Does Familiarity Breed Trust? The Implications of Repeated Ties for Contractual Choice in Alliances , 1995 .

[62]  Joel A. C. Baum,et al.  Don't go it alone: alliance network composition and startups' performance in Canadian biotechnology , 2000 .

[63]  Lori Rosenkopf,et al.  Overcoming Local Search Through Alliances and Mobility , 2003, Manag. Sci..

[64]  G. Ahuja Collaboration Networks, Structural Holes, and Innovation: A Longitudinal Study , 1998 .

[65]  Jeffrey R. Yost The Computer Industry , 2005 .

[66]  Michael L. Tushman,et al.  The Coevolution of Community Networks and Technology: Lessons from the Flight Simulation Industry , 1998 .

[67]  Morten T. Hansen,et al.  The Search-Transfer Problem: The Role of Weak Ties in Sharing Knowledge across Organization Subunits , 1999 .

[68]  David H. Hsu What Do Entrepreneurs Pay for Venture Capital Affiliation? , 2002 .

[69]  R. Gulati,et al.  Where Do Interorganizational Networks Come From?1 , 1999, American Journal of Sociology.