Tropomyosin Controls Sarcomere-like Contractions for Rigidity Sensing and Suppressing Growth on Soft Matrices

Cells test the rigidity of the extracellular matrix by applying forces to it through integrin adhesions. Recent measurements show that these forces are applied by local micrometre-scale contractions, but how contraction force is regulated by rigidity is unknown. Here we performed high temporal- and spatial-resolution tracking of contractile forces by plating cells on sub-micrometre elastomeric pillars. We found that actomyosin-based sarcomere-like contractile units (CUs) simultaneously moved opposing pillars in net steps of ∼2.5 nm, independent of rigidity. What correlated with rigidity was the number of steps taken to reach a force level that activated recruitment of α-actinin to the CUs. When we removed actomyosin restriction by depleting tropomyosin 2.1, we observed larger steps and higher forces that resulted in aberrant rigidity sensing and growth of non-transformed cells on soft matrices. Thus, we conclude that tropomyosin 2.1 acts as a suppressor of growth on soft matrices by supporting proper rigidity sensing.

[1]  M. Sheetz,et al.  Nanometer-scale measurements using video light microscopy. , 1988, Cell motility and the cytoskeleton.

[2]  A systematic nomenclature for mammalian tropomyosin isoforms , 2014, Journal of Muscle Research and Cell Motility.

[3]  Anne Houdusse,et al.  Structural and functional insights into the Myosin motor mechanism. , 2010, Annual review of biophysics.

[4]  V. Freedman,et al.  Cellular tumorigenicity in nude mice: correlation with cell growth in semi-solid medium. , 1974, Cell.

[5]  Xiumei Liu,et al.  Stepwise sliding of single actin and Myosin filaments. , 2004, Biophysical journal.

[6]  Nico Stuurman,et al.  Computer Control of Microscopes Using µManager , 2010, Current protocols in molecular biology.

[7]  D. E. Discher,et al.  Matrix elasticity directs stem cell lineage — Soluble factors that limit osteogenesis , 2009 .

[8]  Christoph F. Schmidt,et al.  Direct observation of kinesin stepping by optical trapping interferometry , 1993, Nature.

[9]  T. Svitkina,et al.  Myosin II filament assemblies in the active lamella of fibroblasts: their morphogenesis and role in the formation of actin filament bundles , 1995, The Journal of cell biology.

[10]  Dylan T Burnette,et al.  Bayesian localisation microscopy reveals nanoscale podosome dynamics , 2011, Nature Methods.

[11]  H. H. Madden.  Comments on the Savitzky-Golay convolution method for least-squares-fit smoothing and differentiation of digital data , 1976 .

[12]  H E Huxley,et al.  Regulation of skeletal muscle contraction. II. Structural studies of the interaction of the tropomyosin-troponin complex with actin. , 1972, Journal of molecular biology.

[13]  R. A. Murphy,et al.  Regulation of shortening velocity by cross-bridge phosphorylation in smooth muscle. , 1988, The American journal of physiology.

[14]  G. Meacci,et al.  Cells test substrate rigidity by local contractions on submicrometer pillars , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[15]  M. Sheetz,et al.  Rigidity sensing at the leading edge through alphavbeta3 integrins and RPTPalpha. , 2006, Biophysical journal.

[16]  A. Stewart,et al.  Skeletal Muscle Performance Determined by Modulation of Number of Myosin Motors Rather Than Motor Force or Stroke Size , 2007, Cell.

[17]  David Gore,et al.  X-ray diffraction evidence for myosin-troponin connections and tropomyosin movement during stretch activation of insect flight muscle , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[18]  D. Salomon,et al.  Tropomyosins of human mammary epithelial cells: consistent defects of expression in mammary carcinoma cell lines. , 1990, Cancer research.

[19]  Michael P. Sheetz,et al.  A model for kinesin movement from nanometer-level movements of kinesin and cytoplasmic dynein and force measurements , 1991, Journal of Cell Science.

[20]  E. Fama,et al.  Migration , 2007 .

[21]  David J Odde,et al.  Traction Dynamics of Filopodia on Compliant Substrates , 2008, Science.

[22]  Stiffness, working stroke, and force of single-myosin molecules in skeletal muscle: elucidation of these mechanical properties via nonlinear elasticity evaluation , 2013, Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences.

[23]  J. Baker,et al.  Single-myosin crossbridge interactions with actin filaments regulated by troponin-tropomyosin. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[24]  M. Dembo,et al.  Substrate flexibility regulates growth and apoptosis of normal but not transformed cells. , 2000, American journal of physiology. Cell physiology.

[25]  M. Reedy,et al.  Electron Tomography of Cryofixed, Isometrically Contracting Insect Flight Muscle Reveals Novel Actin-Myosin Interactions , 2010, PloS one.

[26]  M. Sheetz,et al.  Nanometer analysis of cell spreading on matrix-coated surfaces reveals two distinct cell states and STEPs. , 2004, Biophysical journal.

[27]  Smooth Muscle Heavy Meromyosin Phosphorylated on One of Its Two Heads Supports Force and Motion* , 2009, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[28]  C. O'neill,et al.  Anchorage and growth regulation in normal and virus‐transformed cells , 1968, International journal of cancer.

[29]  Michael P. Sheetz,et al.  Rigidity Sensing at the Leading Edge through αvβ3 Integrins and RPTPα , 2006 .

[30]  A. Savitzky,et al.  Smoothing and Differentiation of Data by Simplified Least Squares Procedures. , 1964 .

[31]  S. Sen,et al.  Matrix Elasticity Directs Stem Cell Lineage Specification , 2006, Cell.

[32]  J. Patlak,et al.  Slip sliding away: load-dependence of velocity generated by skeletal muscle myosin molecules in the laser trap. , 2005, Biophysical journal.

[33]  J. Sellers,et al.  Load-dependent mechanism of nonmuscle myosin 2 , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[34]  M. Sheetz,et al.  Tracking kinesin-driven movements with nanometre-scale precision , 1988, Nature.

[35]  Max A. Little,et al.  Steps and bumps: precision extraction of discrete states of molecular machines. , 2010, Biophysical journal.

[36]  Daniel Choquet,et al.  Extracellular Matrix Rigidity Causes Strengthening of Integrin–Cytoskeleton Linkages , 1997, Cell.

[37]  Donald E Ingber,et al.  Mechanobiology and diseases of mechanotransduction , 2003, Annals of medicine.

[38]  G. Piazzesi,et al.  The non‐linear elasticity of the muscle sarcomere and the compliance of myosin motors , 2014, The Journal of physiology.

[39]  J. Sap,et al.  Receptor protein tyrosine phosphatase α activates Src-family kinases and controls integrin-mediated responses in fibroblasts , 1999, Current Biology.

[40]  Jake M. Hofman,et al.  Nonmuscle myosin IIA-dependent force inhibits cell spreading and drives F-actin flow. , 2006, Biophysical journal.

[41]  Michael P. Sheetz,et al.  The relationship between force and focal complex development , 2002, The Journal of cell biology.

[42]  Jan Lammerding,et al.  Mechanotransduction gone awry , 2009, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.

[43]  V. Fowler,et al.  Pointed-end capping by tropomodulin3 negatively regulates endothelial cell motility , 2003, The Journal of cell biology.

[44]  T. Fath,et al.  Tropomyosin isoforms and reagents , 2011, Bioarchitecture.

[45]  Sergey V. Plotnikov,et al.  Force Fluctuations within Focal Adhesions Mediate ECM-Rigidity Sensing to Guide Directed Cell Migration , 2012, Cell.

[46]  M. Sheetz,et al.  Periodic Lamellipodial Contractions Correlate with Rearward Actin Waves , 2004, Cell.

[47]  A. Mogilner,et al.  Analysis of the local organization and dynamics of cellular actin networks , 2013, The Journal of cell biology.

[48]  Viola Vogel,et al.  Cell fate regulation by coupling mechanical cycles to biochemical signaling pathways. , 2009, Current opinion in cell biology.

[49]  M. Willingham,et al.  Loss of expression of tropomyosin-1, a novel class II tumor suppressor that induces anoikis, in primary breast tumors , 2003, Oncogene.

[50]  M. Willingham,et al.  Suppression of the transformed phenotype of breast cancer by tropomyosin-1. , 2002, Experimental cell research.

[51]  Nicolas Biais,et al.  Integrin-dependent force transmission to the extracellular matrix by α-actinin triggers adhesion maturation , 2013, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[52]  M. Kaya,et al.  Nonlinear Elasticity and an 8-nm Working Stroke of Single Myosin Molecules in Myofilaments , 2010, Science.

[53]  R L Lieber,et al.  Sarcomere length operating range of vertebrate muscles during movement. , 2001, The Journal of experimental biology.

[54]  Pere Roca-Cusachs,et al.  Stretchy proteins on stretchy substrates: the important elements of integrin-mediated rigidity sensing. , 2010, Developmental cell.

[55]  Z. Kam,et al.  Fibroblast polarization is a matrix-rigidity-dependent process controlled by focal adhesion mechanosensing , 2011, Nature Cell Biology.

[56]  Ulrich S Schwarz,et al.  Stochastic force generation by small ensembles of myosin II motors. , 2012, Physical review letters.

[57]  R. Fuldner,et al.  Expression of transduced tropomyosin 1 cDNA suppresses neoplastic growth of cells transformed by the ras oncogene. , 1993, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[58]  Z. Kam,et al.  Differential Effect of Actomyosin Relaxation on the Dynamic Properties of Focal Adhesion Proteins , 2013, PloS one.

[59]  R. A. Murphy,et al.  Cross-bridge phosphorylation and regulation of latch state in smooth muscle. , 1988, The American journal of physiology.

[60]  T. Pollard,et al.  Human platelet myosin. II. In vitro assembly and structure of myosin filaments , 1975, The Journal of cell biology.

[61]  Michael P. Sheetz,et al.  Two-piconewton slip bond between fibronectin and the cytoskeleton depends on talin , 2003, Nature.

[62]  B. Geiger,et al.  Actomyosin-generated tension controls the molecular kinetics of focal adhesions , 2011, Journal of Cell Science.

[63]  Xavier Trepat,et al.  Rigidity sensing and adaptation through regulation of integrin types , 2014, Nature materials.