Change in Contemporary English: A Grammatical Study
暂无分享,去创建一个
Geoffrey Leech | Marianne Hundt | Christian Mair | Nicholas Smith | C. Mair | G. Leech | M. Hundt | Nicholas Smith | Geoffrey Leech | Christian Mair
[1] Michael McCarthy,et al. The English get-passive in spoken discourse: description and implications for an interpersonal grammar , 1999, English Language and Linguistics.
[2] Thyra Jane Bevier. American Use of the Subjunctive , 1931 .
[3] Larisa Oldireva Gustafsson. Nineteenth-century English: The passive in nineteenth-century scientific writing , 2006 .
[4] Christian Mair,et al. Twentieth-Century English: History, Variation and Standardization , 2006 .
[5] Bengt Altenberg,et al. The genitive v. the of-construction: A study of syntactic variation in 17th century English , 1982 .
[6] J. Aitchison. Language Change: Progress or Decay? , 1981 .
[7] G. Leech,et al. The use of computer corpora in the textual demonstrability of gradience in linguistic categories. , 1994 .
[8] Daniel D. Ding. The Passive Voice and Social Values in Science , 2002 .
[9] Douglas Biber,et al. Representativeness in corpus design , 1993 .
[10] Gabriele Stein,et al. THE PHRASAL VERB TYPE ‘TO HAVE A LOOK’ IN MODERN ENGLISH , 1991 .
[11] Marianne Hundt,et al. "Agile" and "Uptight" genres: the Corpus-based approach to language change in progress , 1999 .
[12] K. Popper. Objective Knowledge: An Evolutionary Approach , 1972 .
[13] Isabelle Buchstaller,et al. Diagnostics of age-graded linguistic behaviour: The case of the quotative system1 , 2006 .
[14] Anette Rosenbach,et al. Genitive variation in English : conceptual factors in synchronic and diachronic studies , 2002 .
[15] Geoffrey Leech,et al. Current change in English syntax. , 2006 .
[16] Soili Nokkonen. The semantic variation of need to in four recent British English corpora , 2006 .
[17] Christopher Williams. Non-progressive and progressive aspect in English , 2002 .
[18] G. Pullum,et al. The Cambridge Grammar of the English Language , 2002 .
[19] B. Heine. Auxiliaries: Cognitive Forces and Grammaticalization , 1993 .
[20] Francis James,et al. Semantics of the English subjunctive , 1986 .
[21] Noam Chomsky,et al. वाक्यविन्यास का सैद्धान्तिक पक्ष = Aspects of the theory of syntax , 1965 .
[22] M. L. Samuels,et al. Linguistic Evolution: Conclusions , 1972 .
[23] John M. Anderson. Modals, subjunctives, and (non-)finiteness , 2001, English Language and Linguistics.
[24] Roland Sussex,et al. A note on the get‐passive construction , 1982 .
[25] Anthony McEnery,et al. The UCREL Semantic Analysis System , 2004 .
[26] Geoffrey Leech,et al. Grammatical word class variation within the British National Corpus sampler , 2002 .
[27] Anthony McEnery,et al. HELP or HELP to: What Do Corpora Have to Say? , 2005 .
[28] G. Tottie. An Introduction to American English , 2001 .
[29] Susan Wright. Subjectivity and subjectivisation: Subjectivity and experiential syntax , 1995 .
[30] Federica Barbieri,et al. Quotative Use in American English , 2005 .
[31] F. Palmer. Modality and the English modals , 1979 .
[32] P.J.M. de Haan. Whom is not dead , 2002 .
[33] U. Römer. Progressives, patterns, pedagogy , 2005 .
[34] S. Romaine,et al. The Use of like as a Marker of Reported Speech and Thought: A Case of Grammaticalization in Progress , 1991 .
[35] Geoffrey Leech,et al. Studies in English linguistics for Randolph Quirk , 1980 .
[36] D. Biber,et al. Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English , 1999 .
[37] M Abecassis,et al. Word Frequencies in Written and Spoken English. , 2010 .
[38] Charles Barber. Linguistic change in present-day English , 1965 .
[39] Robert M. Dixon,et al. A new approach to Eng-lish Grammar on semantic principles , 1991 .
[40] Anthony Warner,et al. PREDICTING THE PROGRESSIVE PASSIVE: PARAMETRIC CHANGE WITHIN A LEXICALIST FRAMEWORK , 1995 .
[41] Marianne Hundt,et al. What corpora tell us about the grammaticalisation of voice in get-constructions , 2001 .
[42] Arne Olofsson,et al. A participle caught in the act. On the prepositional use of following , 1990 .
[43] Andreas H. Jucker. Social Stylistics: Syntactic Variation in British Newspapers , 1992 .
[44] P. Trudgill,et al. International English: A guide to varieties of standard English , 1985 .
[45] Ruth Möhlig,et al. Detransitivization in the history of English from a semantic perspective , 2002 .
[46] Nancy Niedzielski,et al. The globalisation of vernacular variation , 2003 .
[47] G. Green. How to get people to do things with words , 1975 .
[48] Ilse Depraetere,et al. On verbal concord with collective nouns in British English , 2003, English Language and Linguistics.
[49] Mark Aronoff. The Editor's Department , 2001 .
[50] Suzanne Romaine,et al. Competing Forms of Adjective Comparison in Modern English: What Could Be More Quicker and Easier and More Effective? , 1997 .
[51] Peter Collins,et al. Get‐passives in English , 1996 .
[52] Margareta Westergren Axelsson. Contraction in British Newspapers in the Late 20th Century , 1998 .
[53] Östen Dahl,et al. Tense and aspect systems , 1985 .
[54] Geoffrey Leech,et al. The comparison of adjectives in recent British English. , 1997 .
[55] David Denison,et al. The language of the Southey–Coleridge Circle , 2000 .
[56] W. Nelson Francis,et al. FREQUENCY ANALYSIS OF ENGLISH USAGE: LEXICON AND GRAMMAR , 1983 .
[57] Ylva Berglund,et al. Future in Present-day English: corpus-based evidence on the rivalry of expressions , 1997 .
[58] Marianne Hundt,et al. Corpus Linguistics and the Web , 2006 .
[59] David Crystal,et al. Stories of English , 2004 .
[60] ANNA H. LIVE,et al. THE TAKE-HAVE PHRASAL IN ENGLISH , 1973 .
[61] Jan Svartvik,et al. A __ comprehensive grammar of the English language , 1988 .
[62] William J. Crawford. The mandative subjunctive , 2009 .
[63] Debra Ziegeler. Agentivity and the history of the English Progressive , 1999 .
[64] Michael McCarthy,et al. Spoken Language and Applied Linguistics , 1998 .
[65] Jan Svartvik. On voice in the English verb , 1985 .
[66] C. Blyth,et al. I'm like, "Say What?!": A New Quotative in American Oral Narrative , 1990 .
[67] S. Johansson,et al. Word Frequencies in British and American English , 1985 .
[68] Marianne Hundt,et al. Global feature - local norms? A case study on the progressive passive , 2009 .
[69] Stefan Thomas Gries,et al. Multifactorial Analysis in Corpus Linguistics: A Study of Particle Placement , 2003 .
[70] Randolph Quirk,et al. Grammatical and lexical variance in English , 1995 .
[71] Dieter Mindt. An Empirical Grammar of the English Verb System. , 2000 .
[72] Eve Sweetser,et al. From Etymology to Pragmatics: Preface , 1990 .
[73] David Denison,et al. Gradience and linguistic change , 2001 .
[74] B. Strang. A history of English , 1970 .
[75] Richard Hudson,et al. About 37% of word-tokens are nouns , 1994 .
[76] Charles Carpenter Fries,et al. American English Grammar: The Grammatical Structure of Present-Day English with Especial Reference to Social Differences or Class Dialects , 1941 .
[77] Pam Peters. The survival of the subjunctive: evidence of its use in Australia and elsewhere , 1998 .
[78] I. Westin. Language change in English newspaper editorials , 2002 .
[79] Frederik Theodoor Visser,et al. An Historical Syntax of the English Language , 2002 .
[80] F. Palmer,et al. Mood and modality , 1986 .
[81] Axel Hübler. The expressivity of grammar : grammatical devices expressing emotion across time , 1998 .
[82] Marianne Hundt,et al. Colonial lag, colonial innovation or simply language change? , 2009 .
[83] H. Fowler,et al. A Dictionary of Modern English Usage , 1926 .
[84] Douglas Biber,et al. Variation across speech and writing: Methodology , 1988 .
[85] Andrew Radford,et al. Transformational Grammar: A First Course , 1988 .
[86] Tony McEnery,et al. The Were-Subjunctive in British Rural Dialects: Marrying Corpus and Questionnaire Data , 2003, Comput. Humanit..
[87] J. Rickford,et al. Syntactic Variation and Change in Progress: Loss of the Verbal Coda in Topic-Restricting as Far as Constructions. , 1995 .
[88] T. Givón,et al. English grammar : a function-based introduction , 1995 .
[89] Facchinetti Roberta. Be able to in Present-day British English , 2000, Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory.
[90] Edward Sapir,et al. Language: An Introduction to the Study of Speech , 1955 .
[91] Erik Smitterberg,et al. The Progressive in 19th-Century English: A Process of Integration , 2005 .
[92] Magnus Levin. Agreement With Collective Nouns in English , 2001 .
[93] Pam Peters,et al. The Cambridge Guide to English Usage , 2004 .
[94] Geoffrey Leech,et al. Recent grammatical change in English: data, description, theory. , 2004 .
[95] Elena Tognini-Bonelli,et al. Corpus Linguistics at Work , 2002, Computational Linguistics.
[96] Laurel J. Brinton,et al. Attitudes toward Increasing Segmentalization , 1996 .
[97] R. Quirk,et al. Longman Guide to English Usage , 1989 .
[98] Irma Taavitsainen,et al. Conventions of Professional Writing , 2000 .
[99] David Sankoff,et al. Linguistics: The Cambridge Survey: Sociolinguistics and syntactic variation , 1988 .
[100] Bettelou Los,et al. The Rise of the To-Infinitive , 2005 .
[101] Terttu Nevalainen,et al. Dynamic have in North American and British Isles English , 2002, English Language and Linguistics.
[102] W. Labov. The social motivation of a sound change , 1963 .
[103] Douglas Biber,et al. Variation among University Spoken and Written Registers: A New Multi-Dimensional Analysis , 2003 .
[104] Bruce Mitchell,et al. Old English Syntax , 1985 .
[105] J. Holmes,et al. An introduction to sociolinguistics , 1987 .
[106] Yngve Olsson,et al. On the syntax of the English verb : with special reference to have a look and similar complex structures , 1963 .
[107] Walter Hirtle,et al. The simple and progressive forms : an analytical approach , 1967 .
[108] Johan Elsness,et al. On the progression of the progressive in early Modern English , 1997 .
[109] Magnus Ljung,et al. Reflections on the English Progressive , 1980 .
[110] Benedikt Szmrecsanyi. Be Going to Versus Will/Shall , 2003 .
[111] Paloma Núñez Pertejo. The progressive in the history of english with special reference to the early modern english period, a corpus-based study , 2001 .
[112] Susan Conrad,et al. Corpus Linguistics: Investigating Language Structure and Use , 1998 .
[113] Wayne Harsh,et al. The subjunctive in English , 1968 .
[114] Otto Jespersen,et al. The Philosophy of Grammar , 1924 .
[115] Douglas Biber,et al. Historical shifts in modification patterns with complex noun phrase structures , 2002 .
[116] A. Bell. Language style as audience design , 1984, Language in Society.
[117] Hilary Chappell. Is the get‐passive adversative? , 1980 .
[118] Robert Dixon,et al. A Semantic Approach to English Grammar , 2005 .
[119] John R. Taylor,et al. What makes a good middle? The role of qualia in the interpretation and acceptability of middle expressions in English , 2004 .
[120] Minoji Akimoto. A Study of Verbo-Nominal Structures in English , 1989 .
[121] Jean-Marc Gachelin. The progressive and habitual aspects in non-standard Englishes , 1997 .
[122] Bruce Mitchell,et al. A guide to Old English , 1965 .
[123] Liliane Haegeman,et al. The get-passive and burzio's generalization , 1985 .
[124] D. Allerton. Stretched Verb Constructions in English , 2001 .
[125] Hans Lindquist. Livelier or more lively? Syntactic and Contextual Factors Influencing the Comparison of Disyllabic Adjectives , 2000, Corpora Galore.
[126] Nicholas Fleisher,et al. The origin of passive get , 2006, English Language and Linguistics.
[127] E. König. On the context-dependence of the progressive in English , 1980 .
[128] J. Myhill,et al. Change and continuity in the functions of the American English modals , 1995 .
[129] Geoffrey Leech,et al. Meaning and the English Verb , 1971 .
[130] William Croft,et al. Explaining language change : an evolutionary approach , 2000 .
[131] Elena Seoane. Information Structure and Word Order Change: The Passive as an Information‐rearranging Strategy in the History of English , 2008 .
[132] Juhani Rudanko,et al. Building a Bridge between the Present and the Past : A Corpus of 19th-century English , 2000 .
[133] David Denison,et al. English historical syntax : verbal constructions , 1994 .
[134] Geoffrey Leech,et al. English in advertising : a linguistic study of advertising in Great Britain , 1966 .
[135] Angela Downing. The Semantics of Get-passives , 1996 .
[136] Kerstin Meints,et al. To get or to be? Use and acquisition of get- versus be- passives: evidence from children and adults , 2003 .
[137] Stig Johansson,et al. Plural attributive nouns in present-day English , 1980 .
[138] Uwe Vosberg. Die Große Komplementverschiebung: Außersemantische Einflüsse auf die Entwicklung satzwertiger Ergänzungen im Neuenglischen , 2006 .
[139] Brian Foster. The Changing English Language , 1968 .
[140] Benedikt Szmrecsanyi,et al. Recent changes in the function and frequency of Standard English genitive constructions: a multivariate analysis of tagged corpora , 2007, English Language and Linguistics.
[141] G. Nickel. COMPLEX VERBAL STRUCTURES IN ENGLISH , 1968 .
[142] N. R. Cattell,et al. Composite predicates in English , 1984 .
[143] Martine Taeymans. An investigation into the marginal modals dare and need in British present-day English , 2003 .
[144] Merja Kytö,et al. The go -Futures in English and French Viewed as an Areal Feature , 2002 .
[145] Marianne Hundt,et al. WHY IS THE PROGRESSIVE BECOMING MORE FREQUENT IN ENGLISH ? A CORPUS-BASED INVESTIGATION OF LANGUAGE CHANGE IN PROGRESS , 1995 .
[146] Juhani Rudanko. Watching English grammar change: a case study on complement selection in British and American English , 2006, English Language and Linguistics.
[147] Geoffrey Leech,et al. The Meanings of the Modals in British and American English. , 1980 .
[148] Jean Aitchison,et al. New media language , 2004 .
[149] H. W. Fowler,et al. The New Fowler\'s Modern English Usage , 1900 .
[150] Kate Kearns,et al. Durative Achievements and Individual-Level Predicates on Events , 2003 .
[151] Sebastian Hoffmann,et al. Grammaticalization and English Complex Prepositions: A Corpus-based Study , 2005 .
[152] John F. Turner,et al. The marked subjunctive in contemporary English , 1980 .
[153] Brian D. Joseph. The Editor's Department: On Change in Language and Change in Language , 2004 .
[154] O. Jespersen. A modern English grammar on historical principles , 1928 .
[155] Barbara A. Misztal,et al. Informality: Social Theory and Contemporary Practice , 1999 .
[156] R. M. Wilson,et al. A Middle English Syntax. Part I, Parts of Speech , 1961 .
[157] Claudia Claridge,et al. MULTI-WORD VERBS IN EARLY MODERN ENGLISH. A Corpus-based Study , 2000 .
[158] Kristin Killie. Subjectivity and the English progressive , 2004, English Language and Linguistics.
[159] Terry Walker,et al. Nineteenth-century English: The subjunctive in adverbial clauses in nineteenth-century English , 2006 .
[160] Christian Mair,et al. Tracking ongoing grammatical change and recent diversification in present-day standard English: the complementary role of small and large corpora , 2006 .
[161] Ann Bodine,et al. Androcentrism in prescriptive grammar: singular ‘they’, sex-indefinite ‘he’, and ‘he or she’ , 1975, Language in Society.
[162] W. Labov,et al. Constraints on the agentless passive , 1983, Journal of Linguistics.
[163] M. Levin. Collective nouns and language change , 2006, English Language and Linguistics.
[164] Bas Aarts,et al. Relative whom: a 'mischief-maker' , 2002 .
[165] Günter Rohdenburg,et al. On the replacement of finite complement clauses by infinitives in English , 1995 .
[166] G. Rohdenburg. Cognitive complexity and increased grammatical explicitness in English , 1996 .
[167] R. Quirk,et al. A Corpus of English Conversation , 1980 .
[168] Elizabeth Closs Traugott,et al. Subjectivity and subjectivisation: Subjectification in grammaticalisation , 1995 .
[169] R. Huddleston. Introduction to the Grammar of English: Verbs, nouns and adjectives: the boundaries between them , 1984 .
[170] M. Krug. Emerging English modals : a corpus-based study of grammaticalization , 2000 .
[171] Geoffrey Leech,et al. Corpus Annotation: Linguistic Information from Computer Text Corpora , 1997 .
[172] Rosemary Leonard,et al. The Interpretation of English Noun Sequences on the Computer , 1984 .
[173] Leah Dennis,et al. The Progressive Tense: Frequency of Its Use in English , 1940, PMLA/Publications of the Modern Language Association of America.
[174] Hans Jürgen Heringer. Lesen lehren lernen : eine rezeptive Grammatik des Deutschen , 2002 .
[175] Oliver Christ,et al. A Modular and Flexible Architecture for an Integrated Corpus Query System , 1994, ArXiv.
[176] Geoffrey Leech,et al. Short term diachronic shifts in part-of-speech frequencies: a comparison of the tagged LOB and F-LOB corpora. , 2002 .
[177] William M. Ryan. Pseudo-Subjunctive 'Were' , 1961 .
[178] Renaat Declerck. A comprehensive descriptive grammar of English , 1991 .
[179] Johannes Scheffer. The Progressive In English , 1975 .
[180] Anke Lüdeling,et al. Corpus Linguistics: An International Handbook , 2009 .
[181] Joan L. Bybee,et al. Frequency of Use and the Organization of Language , 2006 .
[182] Marianne Hundt. “Curtains like these are selling right in the city of Chicago for $1.50” – The mediopassive in American 20th-century advertising language , 2006 .
[183] Ronald R. Butters,et al. Narrative Go 'Say' , 1980 .
[184] Stig Johansson,et al. English computer corpora : selected papers and research guide , 1991 .
[185] M. Stubbs. Text and Corpus Analysis: Computer-Assisted Studies of Language and Culture , 1996 .
[186] S. Collin. The future in English , 2004 .
[187] Angus Macdonald,et al. Histoire de la forme périphrastique être + participe présent en germanique , 1940 .
[188] E. Traugott. On the Rise of Epistemic Meanings in English: An Example of Subjectification in Semantic Change , 1989 .
[189] B. Strang,et al. Some aspects of the history of theBe+ingconstruction , 1982 .
[190] Michael Halliday,et al. An Introduction to Functional Grammar , 1985 .
[191] Teresa Fanego. The Development of Gerunds as Objects of Subject-Control Verbs in English (1400-1760) , 1996 .
[192] M. Shibatani. PASSIVES AND RELATED CONSTRUCTIONS: A PROTOTYPE ANALYSIS , 1985 .
[193] Paul Rayson,et al. Recent change and variation in the British English use of the progressive passive , 2007 .
[194] Joybrato Mukherjee,et al. English Ditransitive Verbs , 2004, English and American Studies in German.
[195] Joybrato Mukherjee. Corpus data in a usage-based cognitive grammar , 2004 .
[196] Graeme D. Kennedy,et al. Book Reviews: An Introduction to Corpus Linguistics , 1999, CL.
[197] Elly van Gelderen,et al. A History of the English Language , 2000 .
[198] Britta Marian Charleston. Studies on the emotional and affective means of expression in modern English , 1960 .
[199] Nadja Nesselhauf. The spread of the progressive and its ‘future’ use , 2007, English Language and Linguistics.
[200] Christian Mair,et al. Three changing patterns of verb complementation in Late Modern English: a real-time study based on matching text corpora , 2002, English Language and Linguistics.
[201] Gerd Övergaard. The mandative subjunctive in American and British English in the 20th century , 1995 .
[202] G. Tottie,et al. Tag Questions in British and American English , 2006 .
[203] Richard W. Bailey,et al. Nineteenth-century English , 1996 .
[204] Harry Bunt,et al. Abduction, Belief and Context in Dialogue , 2000, Natural Language Processing.
[205] Douglas Biber. Modal use across registers and time , 2004 .
[206] Mark Steedman,et al. Temporal Ontology and Temporal Reference , 1988, CL.
[207] Marianne Hundt,et al. Animacy, agentivity, and the spread of the progressive in Modern English , 2004, English Language and Linguistics.
[208] Douglas Biber,et al. A Textual Comparison of British and American Writing , 1987 .
[209] Michael Stubbs,et al. Texts, corpora, and problems of interpretation: A response to Widdowson , 2001 .
[210] Mats Rydén,et al. Noun‐name collocations in British English newspaper language , 1975 .
[211] Gerald Salton,et al. Automatic text processing , 1988 .
[212] Graeme Kennedy. The distribution of agent marking and finiteness as possible contributors to the difficulty of passive voice structures , 2001 .
[213] Elizabeth Closs Traugott,et al. A History of English Syntax , 1971 .
[214] D. Biber,et al. Drift and the Evolution of English Style: A History of Three Genres , 1989 .
[215] Robert Sigley,et al. Text categories and where you can stick them : A crude formality index , 1997 .
[216] Liesbet Heyvaert. A cognitive-functional approach to nominalization in English , 2003 .
[217] Laurie Bauer,et al. Watching English Change: An Introduction to the Study of Linguistic Change in Standard Englishes in the 20th Century , 1994 .
[218] Julia Schlüter. One Language, Two Grammars?: The conditional subjunctive , 2009 .
[219] A. Wierzbicka. 5. Why can you have a drink when you can't *have an eat ? , 1982 .
[220] R. Raab-Fischer. Löst der Genitiv die of-Phrase ab ? Eine korpusgestützte Studie zum Sprachwandel im heutigen English , 1995 .
[221] John Myhill. The development of the strong obligation system in American English , 1996 .
[222] Ingrid Westin,et al. A multi-dimensional study of diachronic variation in British newspaper editorials , 2002 .
[223] N. Fairclough. Discourse and social change , 1992 .
[224] Ekkehard König,et al. Bedeutung und verwendung der progressivform im heutigen englisch , 1973 .
[225] Gunnel Tottie,et al. Try to or try and? Verb complementation in British and American English , 2007 .
[226] Christian Mair,et al. Corpus linguistics and grammaticalisation theory: Statistics, frequencies, and beyond , 2004 .
[227] Marianne Hundt,et al. English mediopassive constructions: A cognitive, corpus-based study of their origin, spread, and current status , 2006 .
[228] Gunnel Tottie. One Language, Two Grammars?: How different are American and British English grammar? And how are they different? , 2009 .
[229] Geoffrey K. Pullum,et al. A Student's Introduction to English Grammar , 2021 .