EHR adoption among doctors who treat the elderly.

OBJECTIVES The purpose of this study is to examine Electronic Health Record (EHR) adoption among Florida doctors who treat the elderly. This analysis contributes to the EHR adoption literature by determining if doctors who disproportionately treat the elderly differ from their counterparts with respect to the utilization of an important quality-enhancing health information technology application. METHODS This study is based on a primary survey of a large, statewide sample of doctors practising in outpatient settings in Florida. Logistic regression analysis was used to determine whether doctors who treat a high volume of elderly (HVE) patients were different with respect to EHR adoption. RESULTS Our analyses included responses from 1724 doctors. In multivariate analyses controlling for doctor age, training, computer sophistication, practice size and practice setting, HVE doctors were significantly less likely to adopt EHR. Specifically, compared with their counterparts, HVE doctors were observed to be 26.7% less likely to be utilizing an EHR system (OR=0.733, 95% CI 0.547-0.982). We also found that doctor age is negatively related to EHR adoption, and practice size and doctor computer savvy-ness is positively associated. CONCLUSIONS Despite the fact that EHR adoption has improved in recent years, doctors in Florida who serve the elderly are less likely to adopt EHRs. As long as HVE doctors are adopting EHR systems at slower rates, the elderly patients treated by these doctors will be at a disadvantage with respect to potential benefits offered by this technology.

[1]  Brian T. Austin,et al.  Organizing care for patients with chronic illness. , 1996, The Milbank quarterly.

[2]  D. Bates,et al.  Effect of computerized physician order entry and a team intervention on prevention of serious medication errors. , 1998, JAMA.

[3]  D. Redelmeier,et al.  The treatment of unrelated disorders in patients with chronic medical diseases. , 1998, The New England journal of medicine.

[4]  Charles P. Friedman,et al.  Development and initial validation of an instrument to measure physicians' use of, knowledge about, and attitudes toward computers. , 1998, Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA.

[5]  D. Bates,et al.  Effects of computerized physician order entry on prescribing practices. , 2000, Archives of internal medicine.

[6]  J Mildon,et al.  Drivers in the electronic medical records market. , 2001, Health management technology.

[7]  B. Starfield,et al.  Prevalence, expenditures, and complications of multiple chronic conditions in the elderly. , 2002, Archives of internal medicine.

[8]  Karen Adams,et al.  Review Paper: Three Decades of Research on Computer Applications in Health Care: Medical Informatics Support at the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality , 2002, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..

[9]  Thomas Bodenheimer,et al.  Improving primary care for patients with chronic illness: the chronic care model, Part 2. , 2002, JAMA.

[10]  Tricia L Erstad,et al.  Analyzing computer based patient records: a review of literature. , 2003, Journal of healthcare information management : JHIM.

[11]  George Hripcsak,et al.  Review Paper: Detecting Adverse Events Using Information Technology , 2003, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..

[12]  Shaw K. Chen,et al.  An investigation into low mail survey response rates of information technology users in health care organizations , 2003, Int. J. Medical Informatics.

[13]  E H Wagner,et al.  Improving the quality of health care for chronic conditions , 2004, Quality and Safety in Health Care.

[14]  Lynda C Burton,et al.  Using electronic health records to help coordinate care. , 2004, The Milbank quarterly.

[15]  J. Cooper,et al.  Organization, management, implementation and value of ehr implementation in a solo pediatric practice. , 2004, Journal of healthcare information management : JHIM.

[16]  Neset Hikmet,et al.  Investigating Response Bias in an Information Technology Survey of Physicians , 2006, Journal of Medical Systems.

[17]  Eric W. Ford,et al.  Predicting the adoption of electronic health records by physicians: when will health care be paperless? , 2006, Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA.

[18]  Nir Menachemi,et al.  EHR and other IT adoption among physicians: results of a large-scale statewide analysis. , 2006, Journal of healthcare information management : JHIM.

[19]  Adam Langley,et al.  The Use of Information Technologies Among Rural and Urban Physicians in Florida , 2007, Journal of Medical Systems.

[20]  Steven R. Simon,et al.  Correlates of electronic health record adoption in office practices: a statewide survey. , 2007, Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA.

[21]  Peter Shin,et al.  Adoption of health information technology in community health centers: results of a national survey. , 2007, Health affairs.

[22]  P. Barry,et al.  Inappropriate prescribing in the elderly , 2007, Journal of clinical pharmacy and therapeutics.

[23]  Chelsea A. Jenter,et al.  Do minority-serving physicians have comparable rates of use of electronic health records? , 2007, AMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium.

[24]  C. Burt,et al.  Are There Patient Disparities When Electronic Health Records Are Adopted? , 2009, Journal of health care for the poor and underserved.

[25]  Steven R Simon,et al.  Electronic health records: use, barriers and satisfaction among physicians who care for black and Hispanic patients. , 2009, Journal of evaluation in clinical practice.

[26]  Eric W. Ford,et al.  Resistance is futile: but it is slowing the pace of EHR adoption nonetheless. , 2009, Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA.