So what do you propose we use instead? A reply to Block.

Unfortunately, Block's brilliant critique is terribly biased, much like a legal brief that presents only one side of the issues at suit. It does not distinguish between the Big Five model of phenotypic personality attributes from alternative models of the causal underpinnings of personality differences. Ironically, it attempts to explain away the extensive evidence for the Big Five model as largely the result of data prestructuring, with no acknowledgement of the unique contribution of the lexical approach to minimizing such problems. Even more seriously, it omits a good deal of crucial evidence favorable to the Big Five model, including studies of Block's own Q-set and independent investigations of personality-related terms in other languages. Sadly, Block's closing suggestions provide little in the way of specific proposals for alternatives that he would have us use instead.

[1]  Jack Block.  Critique of the act frequency approach to personality. , 1989 .

[2]  W. T. Norman,et al.  Toward an adequate taxonomy of personality attributes: replicated factors structure in peer nomination personality ratings. , 1963, Journal of abnormal and social psychology.

[3]  D. Peabody,et al.  Selecting representative trait adjectives. , 1987 .

[4]  J E Everett,et al.  Factor Comparability As A Means Of Determining The Number Of Factors And Their Rotation. , 1983, Multivariate behavioral research.

[5]  O. John,et al.  Traits and types, dynamics and development: No doors should be closed in the study of personality. , 1994 .

[6]  Robyn M. Dawes,et al.  An Experimental Analysis of the Contrast Effect and Its Implications for Intergroup Communication and the Indirect Assessment of Attitude. , 1972 .

[7]  The Eysencks and psychoticism. , 1977 .

[8]  Auke Tellegen,et al.  The structure of mood change: An idiographic/nomothetic analysis. , 1982 .

[9]  Paul T. Costa,et al.  Personality Disorders and the Five-Factor Model of Personality , 1994 .

[10]  J. Block.  On further conjectures regarding acquiescence. , 1971, Psychological bulletin.

[11]  O. John,et al.  Towards a taxonomy of personality descriptors in German: A psycho‐lexical study , 1990 .

[12]  Robert Hogan,et al.  Fifty years of personality psychology , 1993 .

[13]  L. A. Pervin.  Handbook of Personality: Theory and Research , 1992 .

[14]  J. M. Digman,et al.  Further specification of the five robust factors of personality. , 1986 .

[15]  J. Block.  A contrarian view of the five-factor approach to personality description. , 1995, Psychological bulletin.

[16]  Lewis R. Goldberg,et al.  Some determinants of factor structures from personality-trait descriptors. , 1989 .

[17]  W. T. Norman.  On estimating psychological relationships: social desirability and self-report. , 1967, Psychological bulletin.

[18]  K. Lanning.  Dimensionality of observer ratings on the California Adult Q-Set , 1994 .

[19]  J. Block.  Correlational bias in observer ratings: Another perspective on the Berman and Kenny study. , 1977 .

[20]  Cecil H. Brown,et al.  An Explanation of Color Nomenclature Universale , 1977 .

[21]  A. Tellegen.  Folk Concepts and Psychological Concepts of Personality and Personality Disorder , 1993 .

[22]  Roy F. Baumeister,et al.  Self-Regulation of Cognitive Inference and Decision Processes , 1994 .

[23]  M. Lorr,et al.  Differentiating Normal and Abnormal Personality , 1994 .

[24]  Lewis R. Goldberg,et al.  Revealing structure in the data: principles of exploratory factor analysis , 1994 .

[25]  G. Caprara,et al.  Modern Personality Psychology: Critical Reviews and New Directions , 1992 .

[26]  P. Costa,et al.  Toward a new generation of personality theories: Theoretical contexts for the five-factor model. , 1996 .

[27]  P. Ekman,et al.  Constants across cultures in the face and emotion. , 1971, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[28]  O. John,et al.  Gordon Allport: Father and critic of the Five-Factor Model. , 1993 .

[29]  L. R. Goldberg,et al.  Integration of the big five and circumplex approaches to trait structure. , 1992, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[30]  L. R. Goldberg,et al.  The language of personality: Lexical perspectives on the five-factor model. , 1996 .

[31]  J. Block.  An illusory interpretation of the first factor of the MMPI: A reply to Shweder. , 1977 .

[32]  F. Ostendorf,et al.  Sprache und Persönlichkeitsstruktur: zur Validität des Fünf-Faktoren-Modells der Persönlichkeit , 1990 .

[33]  Paul T. Costa,et al.  Evaluating comprehensiveness in personality systems: The California Q‐Set and the five‐factor model , 1986 .

[34]  C. Halverson,et al.  The Developing structure of temperament and personality from infancy to adulthood , 1994 .

[35]  J. S. Wiggins,et al.  The five-factor model of personality : theoretical perspectives , 1996 .