Exploiting Pitch Accent Information in Compound Processing: A Comparison between Adults and 6- to 7-Year-Old Children

ABSTRACT A noun can be potentially ambiguous as to whether it is a head on its own, or is a modifier of a Noun + Noun compound waiting for its head. This study investigates whether young children can exploit the prosodic information on a modifier constituent preceding the head to facilitate resolution of such ambiguity in Japanese. Evidence from English suggests that young speakers are not sensitive to compound stress in distinguishing between compounds and syntactic phrases unless the compound is very familiar (Good, 2008; Vogel & Raimy, 2002). This study concerns whether children in general have such limited capability to use prosodic cues to promptly compute a compound representation without the lexical boost, or whether they might show greater sensitivity to more categorical compound prosody such as that associated with the Compound Accent Rule (CAR) in Japanese. A previous study (Hirose & Mazuka, 2015) demonstrated that adult Japanese speakers can predict the compound structure prior to the head if the prosodic information on the modifier unambiguously signals that the CAR is being applied. The present study conducted the same on-line experiment with children (6- to 7-year-olds) and compared the time course of the effects with that of adults using permutation-based analysis (Maris & Oosternveld, 2007). The results reveal that children are sensitive to pitch accent information that facilitates the quicker processing of the compound or the single head noun representation compared to when such prosodic signals are less apparent, depending on the type of the lexical accent of the noun in question.

[1]  K Szendroi,et al.  Acquisition of focus marking in European Portuguese – Evidence for a unified approach to focus , 2006 .

[2]  Reiko Mazuka,et al.  Young Children's Use of Prosody in Sentence Parsing , 2003, Journal of psycholinguistic research.

[3]  Colin Phillips,et al.  No Fear of Commitment: Children’s Incremental Interpretation in English and Japanese Wh-Questions , 2014 .

[4]  Jessica L. Gamache Lexical bias and prosodic cues: An eye-tracking study of compound/phrase disambiguation , 2013 .

[5]  Erin Good,et al.  The Processing and Acquisition of Two English Contours , 2008 .

[6]  Jennifer E. Arnold,et al.  THE BACON not the bacon: How children and adults understand accented and unaccented noun phrases , 2008, Cognition.

[7]  Duygu Özge,et al.  Incremental processing in head-final child language: online comprehension of relative clauses in Turkish-speaking children and adults , 2015 .

[8]  Eve V. Clark,et al.  Compound Nouns and Category Structure in Young Children. , 1985 .

[9]  Irene Vogel,et al.  The acquisition of compound vs. phrasal stress: the role of prosodic constituents , 2002, Journal of Child Language.

[10]  John C Trueswell,et al.  Children's (in)ability to recover from garden paths in a verb-final language: evidence for developing control in sentence processing. , 2010, Journal of experimental child psychology.

[11]  Kay Atkinson-King,et al.  Children's acquisition of phonological stress contrasts , 1973 .

[12]  Julie C. Sedivy,et al.  Subject Terms: Linguistics Language Eyes & eyesight Cognition & reasoning , 1995 .

[13]  Yuki Hirose,et al.  Predictive processing of novel compounds: Evidence from Japanese , 2015, Cognition.

[14]  Miwa Isobe,et al.  The Acquisition of Nominal Compoundingin Japanese: A Parametric Approach , 2007 .

[15]  Irina A. Sekerina,et al.  Interactive processing of contrastive expressions by Russian children , 2012, First language.

[16]  Gero Kunter,et al.  Compound Stress in English: The Phonetics and Phonology of Prosodic Prominence , 2011 .

[17]  Shigeru Kiritani,et al.  Acquisition of Compound Accent Rule in Japanese , 2001 .

[18]  Paul D. Allopenna,et al.  Tracking the Time Course of Spoken Word Recognition Using Eye Movements: Evidence for Continuous Mapping Models , 1998 .

[19]  Bill Wells,et al.  Intonation development from five to thirteen , 2004, Journal of Child Language.

[20]  Reiko Mazuka,et al.  Intonation facilitates contrast resolution: Evidence from Japanese adults and 6-year olds , 2012 .

[21]  Irina A. Sekerina,et al.  The kindergarten-path effect: studying on-line sentence processing in young children , 1999, Cognition.

[22]  Evan Kidd,et al.  Lexical and referential cues to sentence interpretation: an investigation of children's interpretations of ambiguous sentences , 2005, Journal of Child Language.

[23]  S. Jun,et al.  The Phonetics and Phonology of Korean Prosody , 2018 .

[24]  Kristen Syrett,et al.  The representation and processing of measure phrases by four-year-olds , 2010 .

[25]  M. Kjelgaard,et al.  Prosodic Facilitation and Interference in the Resolution of Temporary Syntactic Closure Ambiguity , 1999 .

[26]  R. Oostenveld,et al.  Nonparametric statistical testing of EEG- and MEG-data , 2007, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[27]  L. Wagner,et al.  Interpretation of contrastive pitch accent in six- to eleven-year-old English-speaking children (and adults)* , 2012, Journal of Child Language.

[28]  Barbara Höhle,et al.  Focus Particles in Children's Language: Production and Comprehension of Auch ‘Also’ in German Learners from 1 Year to 4 Years of Age , 2009 .

[29]  G. Gottfried,et al.  Comprehending compounds: evidence for metaphoric skill? , 1997, Journal of Child Language.

[30]  Reiko Mazuka,et al.  Immediate use of prosody and context in predicting a syntactic structure , 2012, Cognition.

[31]  J. Snedeker Effects of prosodic and lexical constraints on parsing in young children (and adults). , 2008, Journal of memory and language.

[32]  Anne Christophe,et al.  Preschoolers use phrasal prosody online to constrain syntactic analysis. , 2016, Developmental science.

[33]  Harald Clahsen,et al.  Children's Processing of Ambiguous Sentences: A Study of Relative Clause Attachment , 2003 .

[34]  Stephen Crain,et al.  Children's use of phonological information in ambiguity resolution: a view from Mandarin Chinese* , 2011, Journal of Child Language.

[35]  J. Trueswell,et al.  The developing constraints on parsing decisions: The role of lexical-biases and referential scenes in child and adult sentence processing , 2004, Cognitive Psychology.

[36]  Sarah Brown-Schmidt,et al.  One Frog, Two Frog, Red Frog, Blue Frog: Factors Affecting Children's Syntactic Choices in Production and Comprehension , 2000, Journal of psycholinguistic research.

[37]  Evan Kidd,et al.  Children do not overcome lexical biases where adults do: the role of the referential scene in garden-path recovery. , 2011, Journal of child language.

[38]  Reiko Mazuka,et al.  The Development of Japanese Passive Syntax as Indexed by Structural Priming in Comprehension , 2014, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.