Effect of Different Wound Dressings on Cell Viability and Proliferation

Background: Many new dressings have been developed since the early 1980s. Wound healing comprises cleansing, granulation/vascularization, and epithelialization phases. An optimum microenvironment and the absence of cytotoxic factors are essential for epithelialization. This study examines the effect of extracts of different wound dressings on keratinocyte survival and proliferation. Methods: Keratinocyte cultures were exposed for 40 hours to at least three extracts of each of the following wound dressings, which were tested in octuplicate: Acticoat, Aquacel-Ag, Aquacel, Algisite M, Avance, Comfeel Plus transparent, Contreet-H, Hydrasorb, and SeaSorb. Silicone extract provided the reference material. Controls were included of cells cultured in medium that had been incubated under conditions identical to those used with the extracts. Cell survival (3-[4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl]-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide reduction) and proliferation (5-bromo-2′:-deoxyuridine incorporation) were measured. Results: Extracts of silver-containing dressings (Acticoat, Aquacel-Ag, Contreet-H, and Avance) were most cytotoxic. Extracts of Hydrasorb were less cytotoxic but markedly affected keratinocyte proliferation and morphology. Extracts of alginate-containing dressings (Algisite M, SeaSorb, and Contreet-H) demonstrated high calcium concentrations, markedly reduced keratinocyte proliferation, and affected keratinocyte morphology. Extracts of Aquacel and Comfeel Plus transparent induced small but significant inhibition of keratinocyte proliferation. Conclusions: The principle of minimizing harm should be applied to the choice of wound dressing. Silver-based dressings are cytotoxic and should not be used in the absence of infection. Alginate dressings with high calcium content affect keratinocyte proliferation probably by triggering terminal differentiation of keratinocytes. Such dressings should be used with caution in cases in which keratinocyte proliferation is essential. All dressings should be tested in vitro before clinical application.

[1]  F W Pirruccello,et al.  Plastic and reconstructive surgery. , 1967, IMJ. Illinois medical journal.

[2]  S. Ueng,et al.  In vitro elution of antibiotic from antibiotic-impregnated biodegradable calcium alginate wound dressing. , 1999, The Journal of trauma.

[3]  R. Byard,et al.  Unusual donor site reactions to calcium alginate dressings. , 2000, Burns : journal of the International Society for Burn Injuries.

[4]  K. Foster,et al.  Aquacel Ag in the management of partial-thickness burns: results of a clinical trial. , 2004, The Journal of burn care & rehabilitation.

[5]  R. Demling,et al.  The rate of re-epithelialization across meshed skin grafts is increased with exposure to silver. , 2002, Burns : journal of the International Society for Burn Injuries.

[6]  P. Vanstraelen Comparison of calcium sodium alginate (KALTOSTAT) and porcine xenograft (E-Z DERM) in the healing of split-thickness skin graft donor sites. , 1992, Burns : journal of the International Society for Burn Injuries.

[7]  J. Fish,et al.  The use of silver coated dressings on donor site wounds: a prospective, controlled matched pair study. , 2001, Burns : journal of the International Society for Burn Injuries.

[8]  J. Porter A comparative investigation of re-epithelialisation of split skin graft donor areas after application of hydrocolloid and alginate dressings. , 1991, British journal of plastic surgery.

[9]  M. Rosdy,et al.  Cytotoxicity testing of wound dressings using normal human keratinocytes in culture. , 1990, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[10]  A. Lansdown Calcium: a potential central regulator in wound healing in the skin , 2002, Wound repair and regeneration : official publication of the Wound Healing Society [and] the European Tissue Repair Society.

[11]  R. Burrell A scientific perspective on the use of topical silver preparations. , 2003, Ostomy/Wound Management.

[12]  R. Isseroff,et al.  Wound Dressings Alter the Colony-Forming Efficiency of Keratinocytes in Cultured Sheet Grafts , 2001, Cell transplantation.

[13]  V. Poon,et al.  In vitro cytotoxity of silver: implication for clinical wound care. , 2004, Burns : journal of the International Society for Burn Injuries.

[14]  K. Ballard,et al.  Avance: silver hydropolymer dressing for critically colonized wounds. , 2002, British journal of nursing.

[15]  A. Attwood Calcium alginate dressing accelerates split skin graft donor site healing. , 1989, British journal of plastic surgery.

[16]  H J Klasen,et al.  Historical review of the use of silver in the treatment of burns. I. Early uses. , 2000, Burns : journal of the International Society for Burn Injuries.

[17]  H. Green,et al.  Seria cultivation of strains of human epidemal keratinocytes: the formation keratinizin colonies from single cell is , 1975, Cell.

[18]  R. Burrell,et al.  Healing of porcine donor sites covered with silver-coated dressings. , 2000, The European journal of surgery = Acta chirurgica.

[19]  Fox Cl Topical therapy and the development of silver sulfadiazine. , 1983 .

[20]  J. Rubin,et al.  Human keratinocyte growth factor activity on proliferation and differentiation of human keratinocytes: Differentiation response distinguishes KGF from EGF family , 1990, Journal of cellular physiology.

[21]  P Nieuwenhuis,et al.  Cytotoxicity testing of wound dressings using methylcellulose cell culture. , 1992, Biomaterials.

[22]  T. Roth,et al.  Effects of calcium alginate on cellular wound healing processes modeled in vitro. , 1996, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[23]  H. Klasen,et al.  A historical review of the use of silver in the treatment of burns. II. Renewed interest for silver. , 2000, Burns : journal of the International Society for Burn Injuries.

[24]  R. Isaacs,et al.  Calcium—cell cycle regulator, differetiator, killer, chemopreventor, and maybe, tumor promoter , 1995, Journal of cellular biochemistry. Supplement.

[25]  S. Thomas,et al.  A comparison of the antimicrobial effects of four silver-containing dressings on three organisms. , 2003, Journal of wound care.

[26]  R. Dover,et al.  Toxicity testing of wound dressing materials in vitro. , 1995, British journal of plastic surgery.

[27]  A. Lansdown,et al.  Contreet Foam and Contreet Hydrocolloid: an insight into two new silver-containing dressings. , 2003, Journal of wound care.

[28]  T. Nakamura,et al.  Evaluation of a novel alginate gel dressing: cytotoxicity to fibroblasts in vitro and foreign-body reaction in pig skin in vivo. , 1998, Journal of biomedical materials research.