A GPU-based computer-assisted microscopy system for assessing the importance of different families of histological characteristics in cancer diagnosis

In this study a Computer-Aided Microscopy (CAM) system is proposed for investigating the importance of the histological criteria involved in diagnosing of cancers in microscopy in order to suggest the more informative features for discriminating low from high-grade brain tumours. Four families of criteria have been examined, involving the greylevel variations (i.e. texture), the morphology (i.e. roundness), the architecture (i.e. cellularity) and the overall tumour qualities (expert’s ordinal scale). The proposed CAM system was constructed using a modified Seeded Region Growing algorithm for image segmentation, and the Probabilistic Neural Network classifier for image classification. The implementation was designed on a commercial Graphics Processing Unit card using parallel programming. The system’s performance using textural, morphological, architectural and ordinal information was 90.8%, 87.0%, 81.2% and 88.9% respectively. Results indicate that nuclei texture is the most important family of features regarding the degree of malignancy, and, thus, may guide more accurate predictions for discriminating low from high grade gliomas. Considering that nuclei texture is almost impractical to be encoded by visual observation, the need to incorporate computer-aided diagnostic tools as second opinion in daily clinical practice of diagnosing rare brain tumours may be justified.

[1]  Reinhold Nafe,et al.  Topometric analysis of diffuse astrocytomas. , 2003, Analytical and quantitative cytology and histology.

[2]  Mary M. Galloway,et al.  Texture analysis using gray level run lengths , 1974 .

[3]  Van De Wouwer,et al.  Wavelets as chromatin texture descriptors for the automated identification of neoplastic nuclei , 2000, Journal of microscopy.

[4]  Rolf Adams,et al.  Seeded Region Growing , 1994, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[5]  H Kolles,et al.  Data-driven approaches to decision making in automated tumor grading. An example of astrocytoma grading. , 1996, Analytical and quantitative cytology and histology.

[6]  Nabil Belacel,et al.  Multicriteria fuzzy assignment method: a useful tool to assist medical diagnosis , 2001, Artif. Intell. Medicine.

[7]  C Decaestecker,et al.  Nearest-neighbor classification for identification of aggressive versus nonaggressive low-grade astrocytic tumors by means of image cytometry-generated variables. , 1997, Journal of neurosurgery.

[8]  Robert M. Haralick,et al.  Textural Features for Image Classification , 1973, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern..

[9]  L R Schad,et al.  Numerical grading of astrocytomas. , 1987, Medical informatics = Medecine et informatique.

[10]  H Kolles,et al.  Histologic and morphometric grading of gliomas. A comparative survival analysis. , 1997, Analytical and quantitative cytology and histology.

[11]  B. Scheithauer,et al.  The New WHO Classification of Brain Tumours , 1993, Brain pathology.

[12]  H Kalimo,et al.  Grading of diffusely infiltrating astrocytomas by quantitative histopathology, cell proliferation and image cytometric DNA analysis , 2000, Neuropathology and applied neurobiology.

[13]  P H Bartels,et al.  Computer-assisted discrimination of glioblastomas. , 1997, Analytical and quantitative cytology and histology.

[14]  Nikos Dimitropoulos,et al.  Multimodality GPU-based computer-assisted diagnosis of breast cancer using ultrasound and digital mammography images , 2013, International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery.

[15]  Anil K. Jain,et al.  Statistical Pattern Recognition: A Review , 2000, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..