Figured Lifeworlds and Depositional Practices at Çatalhöyük

The corpus of figurines from Çatalhöyük has attracted the attention of diverse audiences but there has been an overwhelming focus on a selection of female figurines, many of which lack exact provenience. Excavation from 1961 to 1965 yielded more mundane examples classifiable as anthropomorphic, zoomorphic and abbreviated forms. New work attempts to balance the picture through various methods and strategies. The research presented here collates the artefacts from these early seasons with those retrieved from 1993 to 2006 to gain a fuller understanding of figurine practice. The figurines almost exclusively represent secondary deposition. We can now assess the number and type of figurines deposited in buildings, middens, burials and elsewhere. Reassessment of the entire corpus has prompted interrogation of the category of ‘figurine’ and reconsideration of the taxonomies along with other artefacts and image production at Çatalhöyük. Depositional practices at the site suggest processes of mobility and circulation that have rarely been considered in studies of figurines. Typical ‘representational’ or aesthetic approaches imply that the figurines were a special category with particular values of religiosity and gender; but attention to the archaeological context can imply meaning from the material practices within which ‘figurines’ were enmeshed.

[1]  Ian Hodder,et al.  Changing Materialities at Çatalhöyuk: Reports from the 1995-99 Seasons , 2006 .

[2]  M. Gimbutas,et al.  The Civilization of the Goddess: The World of Old Europe , 1991 .

[3]  L. Meskell Goddesses, Gimbutas and New Age archaeology , 1995, Antiquity.

[4]  J. Mellaart Excavations at Çatal Hüyük, 1965, Fourth Preliminary Report , 1966, Anatolian Studies.

[5]  C. Jensen Magic Practices and Ritual in the Near Eastern Neolithic , 2002 .

[6]  M. Burkitt Earliest Civilizations of the Near East , 1965, Nature.

[7]  C. Renfrew,et al.  Image and imagination : a global prehistory of figurative representation , 2007 .

[8]  J. Mellaart Excavations at Çatal Hüyük: First Preliminary Report, 1961 , 1962, Anatolian Studies.

[9]  M. Voigt ÇatalHöyük in Context Ritual at Early Neolithic Sites in Central and Eastern Turkey , 2000 .

[10]  J. Mellaart Excavations at Çatal Hüyük, 1963: Third Preliminary Report , 1964, Anatolian Studies.

[11]  Nerissa Russell,et al.  The Leopard's Tale: Revealing the Mysteries of Çatalhöyük , 2007 .

[12]  M. Verhoeven Ritual and Ideology in the Pre-Pottery Neolithic B of the Levant and Southeast Anatolia , 2002, Cambridge Archaeological Journal.

[13]  I. Hodder,et al.  Daily Practice and Social Memory at Çatalhöyük , 2004, American Antiquity.

[14]  J. Mellaart The Neolithic of the Near East , 1976 .

[15]  Ian Hodder,et al.  Towards Reflexive Method in Archaeology: The Example at Catalhoyuk , 2002 .

[16]  James Mellaart,et al.  Catal Huyuk: A Neolithic Town in Anatolia , 1967 .

[17]  T. Musacchio,et al.  Object Worlds in Ancient Egypt: Material Biographies Past and Present. Lynn Meskell. , 2006 .

[18]  M. Verhoeven An Archaeological Ethnography of a Neolithic Community: Space, Place and Social Relations in the Burnt Village at Tell Sabi Abyad, Syria , 1999 .

[19]  W. Matthews Micromorphological and microstratigraphic traces of uses and concepts of space , 2004 .

[20]  L. Meskell,et al.  Bodies of Evidence on Prehistoric Cyprus , 1997, Cambridge Archaeological Journal.

[21]  M. Gimbutas The language of the goddess : unearthing the hidden symbols of western civilization , 1991 .

[22]  M. Charles,et al.  Arson or Accident? The Burning of a Neolithic House at Çatalhöyük, Turkey , 2008 .

[23]  D. Bailey Prehistoric Figurines: Representation and Corporeality in the Neolithic , 2005 .

[24]  J. Mellaart Excavations at Çatal Hüyük, 1962: Second Preliminary Report , 1963, Anatolian Studies.