The Mind Through Chick Eyes : Memory, Cognition and Anticipation

Abstract To understand the animal mind, we have to reconstruct how animals recognize the external world through their own eyes. For the reconstruction to be realistic, explanations must be made both in their proximate causes (brain mechanisms) as well as ultimate causes (evolutionary backgrounds). Here, we review recent advances in the behavioral, psychological, and system-neuroscience studies accomplished using the domestic chick as subjects. Diverse behavioral paradigms are compared (such as filial imprinting, sexual imprinting, one-trial passive avoidance learning, and reinforcement operant conditioning) in their behavioral characterizations (development, sensory and motor aspects of functions, fitness gains) and relevant brain mechanisms. We will stress that common brain regions are shared by these distinct paradigms, particularly those in the ventral telencephalic structures such as AIv (in the archistriatum) and LPO (in the medial striatum). Neuronal ensembles in these regions could code the chick's anticipation for forthcoming events, particularly the quality/quantity and the temporal proximity of rewards. Without the internal representation of the anticipated proximity in LPO, behavioral tolerance will be lost, and the chick makes impulsive choice for a less optimized option. Functional roles of these regions proved compatible with their anatomical counterparts in the mammalian brain, thus suggesting that the neural systems linking between the memorized past and the anticipated future have remained highly conservative through the evolution of the amniotic vertebrates during the last 300 million years. With the conservative nature in mind, research efforts should be oriented toward a unifying theory, which could explain behavioral deviations from optimized foraging, such as “naïve curiosity,” “contra-freeloading,” “Concorde fallacy,” and “altruism.”

[1]  Horn,et al.  Neural encoding of subject–object distance in a visual recognition system , 1998, The European journal of neuroscience.

[2]  W. Smeets,et al.  Evolution of the basal ganglia in tetrapods: a new perspective based on recent studies in amphibians , 1998, Trends in Neurosciences.

[3]  R. C. Honey,et al.  Imprinting, learning and development: from behaviour to brain and back , 1998, Trends in Neurosciences.

[4]  G. Horn,et al.  Connections of the hyperstriatum ventrale of the domestic chick (Gallus domesticus). , 1985, Journal of anatomy.

[5]  Robert L. Carroll,et al.  Vertebrate Paleontology and Evolution , 1988 .

[6]  Mechanisms for social transmission of pecking preferences to neonatal chicks. , 1984 .

[7]  G. Vallortigara,et al.  Young chickens learn to localize the centre of a spatial environment , 1997, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[8]  G. Horn,et al.  Neurophysiological Investigations of a Recognition Memory System for Imprinting in the Domestic Chick , 1995, The European journal of neuroscience.

[9]  G. Horn,et al.  Hemispheric asymmetry and imprinting: The effect of sequential lesions to the hyperstriatum ventrale , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[10]  Khashayar Farsad,et al.  Comparative Vertebrate Neuroanatomy: Evolution and Adaptation , 1996, The Yale Journal of Biology and Medicine.

[11]  C. Cate,et al.  Song learning from playback in zebra finches: is there an effect of operant contingency? , 1999, Animal Behaviour.

[12]  A. Csillag,et al.  Cell types of the paleostriatal complex of the domestic chicken (Gallus domesticus): a Golgi study. , 1988, Journal fur Hirnforschung.

[13]  J. Bowmaker,et al.  Visual pigments and oil droplets from six classes of photoreceptor in the retinas of birds , 1997, Vision Research.

[14]  Irene M. Pepperberg,et al.  In Search of King Solomon’s Ring: Cognitive and Communicative Studies of Grey Parrots (Psittacus erithacus) , 2002, Brain, Behavior and Evolution.

[15]  Shigeru Watanabe Van Gogh, Chagall and pigeons: picture discrimination in pigeons and humans , 2001, Animal Cognition.

[16]  Locating an error correction signal for adult birdsong , 2000, Nature Neuroscience.

[17]  G. Vallortigara,et al.  Encoding of geometric and landmark information in the left and right hemispheres of the Avian Brain. , 2001, Behavioral neuroscience.

[18]  G. Vallortigara,et al.  Visual perception of biological motion in newly hatched chicks as revealed by an imprinting procedure , 2000, Animal Cognition.

[19]  Patrick Bateson,et al.  Imprinting and recognition memory: a neural net model , 1994, Animal Behaviour.

[20]  J. Lazarus,et al.  Free food or earned food? A review and fuzzy model of contrafreeloading , 1997, Animal Behaviour.

[21]  G. Horn,et al.  Memory, Imprinting and the Brain , 1985 .

[22]  M. Wakita,et al.  Pigeons' discrimination of paintings by Monet and Picasso. , 1995, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[23]  T. Matsushima,et al.  Potentiation and depotentiation of DNQX-sensitive fast excitatory synaptic transmission in telencephalone of the quail chick , 1995, Neuroscience Letters.

[24]  P. Bateson,et al.  An autoradiographic study of the chick brain after imprinting , 1979, Brain Research.

[25]  Hemispheric asymmetry of learning-induced changes , 1991 .

[26]  T. Matsushima,et al.  Visual Cues for Suppressing Isolation-Induced Distress Calls in Quail Chicks , 2001 .

[27]  D. Rusakov,et al.  Morphological changes associated with stages of memory formation in the chick following passive avoidance training , 1995, Behavioural Brain Research.

[28]  S. Rose,et al.  Dissociation of brain sites necessary for registration and storage of memory for a one-trial passive avoidance task in the chick. , 1991, Behavioral neuroscience.

[29]  P. Bateson,et al.  Amnesic effects of bilateral lesions placed in the hyperstriatum ventrale of the chick after imprinting , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[30]  H. Karten,et al.  A stereotaxic atlas of the brain of the pigeon (Columba livia) , 1967 .

[31]  S. Rose How chicks make memories: the cellular cascade from c-fos to dendritic remodelling , 1991, Trends in Neurosciences.

[32]  A. Reiner,et al.  Do birds possess homologues of mammalian primary visual, somatosensory and motor cortices? , 2000, Trends in Neurosciences.

[33]  S. Rose,et al.  The Making of Memory: From Molecules to Mind , 1996 .

[34]  S. Rose,et al.  Cellular correlates of stages of memory formation in the chick following passive avoidance training , 1999, Behavioural Brain Research.

[35]  A. Csillag,et al.  Termination pattern of medial hyperstriatum ventrale efferents in the archistriatum of the domestic chick , 1994, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[36]  C. Kappers,et al.  The comparative anatomy of the nervous system of vertebrates, including man , 1936 .

[37]  T. Matsushima,et al.  Accurate Visual Memory of Colors in Controlling the Pecking Behavior of Quail Chicks , 2000, Zoological science.

[38]  G. Vallortigara,et al.  Position learning in chicks , 1986, Behavioural Processes.

[39]  Giorgio Vallortigara,et al.  Separate processing mechanisms for encoding of geometric and landmark information in the avian hippocampus , 2003, The European journal of neuroscience.

[40]  M. W. Brown,et al.  Tracking memory's trace , 2001, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[41]  G. Vallortigara,et al.  Right-left asymmetry in position learning of male chicks , 1988, Behavioural Brain Research.

[42]  Jacques Vauclair Animal Cognition: An Introduction to Modern Comparative Psychology , 1996 .

[43]  Nonspecific imprintability of quail to colors: Response to artificial selection , 1990, Behavior genetics.

[44]  P. Bateson How do sensitive periods arise and what are they for? , 1979, Animal Behaviour.

[45]  T. Matsushima,et al.  Reward-related neuronal activities in basal ganglia of domestic chicks , 2001, Neuroreport.

[46]  A. Cherkin Kinetics of memory consolidation: role of amnesic treatment parameters. , 1969, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[47]  Gabriel Horn,et al.  Effects of restricted lesions of the chick forebrain on the acquisition of filial preferences during imprinting , 1981, Brain Research.

[48]  B. Zikopoulos,et al.  Passive avoidance training enhances cell proliferation in 1‐day‐old chicks , 2002, The European journal of neuroscience.

[49]  T. Matsushima,et al.  D1-receptor dependent synaptic potentiation in the basal ganglia of quail chicks , 2001, Neuroreport.

[50]  A. Csillag,et al.  Efferent connections of the domestic chick archistriatum: A phaseolus lectin anterograde tracing study , 1997, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[51]  H. Wagner,et al.  Perception and neuronal coding of subjective contours in the owl , 1999, Nature Neuroscience.

[52]  Zhonghe Zhou,et al.  Archaeoraptor's better half , 2002, Nature.

[53]  N. Emery,et al.  Effects of experience and social context on prospective caching strategies by scrub jays , 2001, Nature.

[54]  A. Csillag,et al.  Effects of diencephalic lesions on approach responses and color preferences in quail , 1995, Physiology & Behavior.

[55]  P. Kuhl,et al.  Birdsong and human speech: common themes and mechanisms. , 1999, Annual review of neuroscience.

[56]  Harvey J. Karten,et al.  Evolution of the amniote basal ganglia , 1984, Trends in Neurosciences.

[57]  T. Matsushima,et al.  Distinct mechanisms for expression of Fos-like immunoreactivity and synaptic potentiation in telencephalic hyperstriatum of the quail chick , 1998, Brain Research.

[58]  S. Rose,et al.  Alterations in synaptic structure in the paleostriatal complex of the domestic chick,Gallus domesticus, following passive avoidance training , 1987, Brain Research.

[59]  T. Matsushima,et al.  Localized Lesion of Caudal Part of Lobus Parolfactorius Caused Impulsive Choice in the Domestic Chick: Evolutionarily Conserved Function of Ventral Striatum , 2003, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[60]  W. Kuenzel,et al.  A stereotaxic atlas of the brain of the chick (Gallus domesticus) , 1988 .

[61]  Williams,et al.  Review Of "Minds Of Their Own: Thinking And Awareness In Animals" By L. J. Rogers , 1999 .

[62]  P. Bateson Preferences for cousins in Japanese quail , 1982, Nature.

[63]  Dawn M. Taylor,et al.  The effects of hyperstriatal lesions on one-trial passive-avoidance learning in the chick , 1988, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[64]  J. Alcock Animal Behavior: An Evolutionary Approach , 1975 .

[65]  M. Norell,et al.  Two feathered dinosaurs from northeastern China , 1998, Nature.

[66]  M. Johnson,et al.  Archistriatal Lesions Impair the Acquisition of Filial Preferences During Imprinting in the Domestic Chick , 1994, The European journal of neuroscience.

[67]  D. Davies,et al.  The Effects of Archistriatal Lesions on One‐trial Passive Avoidance Learning in the Chick , 1994, The European journal of neuroscience.

[68]  A. Csillag Striato-telencephalic and striato-tegmental circuits: relevance to learning in domestic chicks , 1999, Behavioural Brain Research.

[69]  S. Rose,et al.  Passive avoidance training results in lasting changes in deoxyglucose metabolism in left hemisphere regions of chick brain. , 1985, Behavioral and neural biology.

[70]  A. Dickinson,et al.  Episodic-like memory during cache recovery by scrub jays , 1998, Nature.

[71]  G. Roth,et al.  Brain Evolution and Cognition , 2000 .

[72]  Toshiya Matsushima,et al.  The role of basal ganglia in reinforcement learning and imprinting in domestic chicks , 2001, Neuroreport.

[73]  Donald A. Dewsbury,et al.  Animal Behavior: An Evolutionary Approach (4th ed.). , 1989 .

[74]  C. S. S.,et al.  The Comparative Anatomy of the Nervous System of Vertebrates, including Man , 1937, Nature.

[75]  Toru Shimizu Evolution of the Forebrain in Tetrapods , 2000 .

[76]  T. Matsushima,et al.  Visual Memory of Shapes in Quail Chicks: Discrimination among 2-Dimensional Objects , 2002, Zoological science.

[77]  A. Csillag,et al.  Connectivity of the lobus parolfactorius of the domestic chicken (Gallus domesticus): An anterograde and retrograde pathway tracing study , 1994, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[78]  S. Rose,et al.  Memory in the chick: multiple cues, distinct brain locations. , 1992, Behavioral neuroscience.

[79]  Effects of bilateral hemispherectomy on genetically variable stimulus preferences and imprinting in quail chicks , 1993, Brain Research.

[80]  G. Vallortigara,et al.  Lateral asymmetries due to preferences in eye use during visual discrimination learning in chicks , 1996, Behavioural Brain Research.

[81]  M. Vorobyev,et al.  Accurate memory for colour but not pattern contrast in chicks , 1999, Current Biology.

[82]  T. Matsushima,et al.  Expression of Transcription Factor ZENK (zif/268) in Telencephalon of Quail Chicks after Induced Seizure and Passive Avoidance Training , 2000 .

[83]  K. Takamatsu,et al.  Metabolic mapping of chick brain after imprinting using [14C]2-deoxyglucose technique , 1979, Brain Research.

[84]  R. J. Steele,et al.  The involvement of dopamine in the striatum in passive avoidance training in the chick , 1996, Neuroscience.

[85]  L. Regolin,et al.  Perception of partly occluded objects by young chicks , 1995, Perception & psychophysics.

[86]  A. Csillag,et al.  Cell types of the hyperstriatum ventrale of the domestic chicken (Gallus domesticus): a Golgi study. , 1988, Journal fur Hirnforschung.

[87]  T. Matsushima,et al.  Neural correlates of memorized associations and cued movements in archistriatum of the domestic chick , 2003, The European journal of neuroscience.

[88]  P. Chance Learning and Behavior , 1979 .

[89]  T. Matsushima,et al.  Lesions of the ventro-medial basal ganglia impair the reinforcement but not the recall of memorized color discrimination in domestic chicks , 2002, Behavioural Brain Research.

[90]  James M. Clark,et al.  A Velociraptor wishbone , 1997, Nature.

[91]  A. Kacelnik,et al.  Cost can increase preference in starlings , 2002, Animal Behaviour.

[92]  D. Durstewitz,et al.  The dopaminergic innervation of the avian telencephalon , 1999, Progress in Neurobiology.

[93]  Mario Zanforlin,et al.  Delayed search for a concealed imprinted object in the domestic chick , 1998, Animal Cognition.

[94]  M. Wassef,et al.  Expression of the Emx-1 and Dlx-1 homeobox genes define three molecularly distinct domains in the telencephalon of mouse, chick, turtle and frog embryos: implications for the evolution of telencephalic subdivisions in amniotes. , 1998, Development.

[95]  J. E. Mazur Learning and behavior (5th ed.). , 2002 .

[96]  T. Matsushima,et al.  Predisposed Visual Memory of Shapes in Quail Chicks , 2000, Zoological science.

[97]  M. Hauser Wild Minds: What Animals Really Think , 2000 .

[98]  G. Holton Sociobiology: the new synthesis? , 1977, Newsletter on science, technology & human values.

[99]  S. Rose Cell-adhesion molecules, glucocorticoids and long-term-memory formation , 1995, Trends in Neurosciences.

[100]  J. Rubenstein,et al.  Pallial and subpallial derivatives in the embryonic chick and mouse telencephalon, traced by the expression of the genes Dlx‐2, Emx‐1, Nkx‐2.1, Pax‐6, and Tbr‐1 , 2000, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[101]  A. Reiner,et al.  Structural and functional evolution of the basal ganglia in vertebrates , 1998, Brain Research Reviews.

[102]  Johan J Bolhuis,et al.  Early learning and the development of filial preferences in the chick , 1999, Behavioural Brain Research.

[103]  J. Cherfas Prior exposure to light improves avoidance learning in day-old chicks , 1977, Animal Behaviour.

[104]  Stimulus representation: a subprocess of imprinting and conditioning. , 1991, Journal of comparative psychology.

[105]  J. Kovach Mendelian units of inheritance control color preferences in quail chicks (Coturnix coturnix japonica). , 1980, Science.

[106]  S. Rose,et al.  Observation learning in day-old chicks using a one-trial passive avoidance learning paradigm , 1998, Animal Behaviour.

[107]  G. Vallortigara,et al.  Searching for the center: spatial cognition in the domestic chick (Gallus gallus). , 2000, Journal of experimental psychology. Animal behavior processes.