Performance Analysis of Segmentation Approach for Cursive Handwriting on Benchmark Database

The purpose of this paper is to analyze improved performance of our segmentation algorithm on IAM benchmark database in comparison to others available in the literature from accuracy and complexity points of view. Segmentation is achieved by analyzing ligatures which are strong points for segmentation of cursive handwritten words. Following preprocessing, a new heuristic technique is employed to over-segment each word at potential segmentation points. Subsequently, a simple criterion is performed to come out with fine segmentation points based on character shape analysis. Finally, the fine segmentation points are fed to train neural network for validating segment points to enhance accuracy. Based on detailed analysis and comparison, it was observed that proposed approach increased the segmentation accuracy with minimum computational complexity.

[1]  Brijesh Verma.  A contour code feature based segmentation for handwriting recognition , 2003, Seventh International Conference on Document Analysis and Recognition, 2003. Proceedings..

[2]  Graham Leedham,et al.  Knowledge-based English cursive script segmentation , 2000, Pattern Recognit. Lett..

[3]  Fatos T. Yarman-Vural,et al.  Optical Character Recognition for Cursive Handwriting , 2002, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[4]  N. Otsu.  A threshold selection method from gray level histograms , 1979 .

[5]  Berrin A. Yanikoglu,et al.  Segmentation of off-line cursive handwriting using linear programming , 1998, Pattern Recognit..

[6]  Brijesh Verma.  A contour character extraction approach in conjunction with a neural confidence fusion technique for the segmentation of handwriting recognition , 2002, Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Neural Information Processing, 2002. ICONIP '02..

[7]  Driss Aboutajdine,et al.  Hypergraph imaging: an overview , 2002, Pattern Recognit..

[8]  Nikos Fakotakis,et al.  A slant removal algorithm , 2000, Pattern Recognit..

[9]  H. Lee,et al.  Over-segmentation and validation strategy for off-line cursive handwriting recognition , 2008, 2008 International Conference on Intelligent Sensors, Sensor Networks and Information Processing.

[10]  Horst Bunke,et al.  The IAM-database: an English sentence database for offline handwriting recognition , 2002, International Journal on Document Analysis and Recognition.

[11]  Basilios Gatos,et al.  Handwriting Segmentation Contest , 2007, ICDAR.

[12]  Vallipuram Muthukkumarasamy,et al.  Enhancing neural confidence-based segmentation for cursive handwriting recognition , 2004 .

[13]  Brijesh Verma,et al.  Analysis of segmentation performance on the CEDAR benchmark database , 2001, Proceedings of Sixth International Conference on Document Analysis and Recognition.

[14]  Chun Ki Cheng,et al.  Improving the Segmentation of Cursive Handwritten Words using Ligature Detection and Neural Validation , 2005 .

[15]  Dzulkifli Mohamad,et al.  A simple segmentation approach for unconstrained cursive handwritten words in conjunction with neural network , 2008 .

[16]  Paul D. Gader,et al.  Fusion of multiple handwritten word recognition techniques , 2001, Pattern Recognit. Lett..

[17]  Fajri Kurniawan,et al.  A NEW APPROACH FOR SEGMENTING DIFFICULT CURSIVE HANDWRITTEN WORDS FROM BENCHMARK DATABASE , 2008 .

[18]  Eric Lecolinet,et al.  A Survey of Methods and Strategies in Character Segmentation , 1996, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[19]  Brijesh Verma,et al.  A Segmentation Algorithm used in Conjunction with Artificial Neural Networks for the Recognition of Real-World Postal Addresses , 1997 .

[20]  M. Hanmandlu,et al.  Segmentation of Cursive Handwritten Words using Hypergraph , 2006, TENCON 2006 - 2006 IEEE Region 10 Conference.