Assessment of palatal masticatory mucosa: a cross-sectional study.

AIM To treat mucogingival problems palatal masticatory mucosa is used as a donor material. This study aimed to determine the thickness of donor palatal mucosa and associations of age and gender in Indian subjects aged 14 to 60 years by direct clinical technique. MATERIALS AND METHODS Forty systemically and periodontally healthy Indian subjects (20 males; 20 females; age range of 14 to 60 years) enrolled in this study. Under local anesthesia bone sounding technique was performed at 15 defined and predetermined points. The Wilcoxon test was used to determine the difference in mucosal thickness between the age groups and between genders. Significance of the difference between individuals of different body mass index (BMI) was assessed by independent t-test. RESULTS With mean thickness of 2.0 to 3.7 mm, the younger age group demonstrated significantly thinner donor mucosa (mean 2.8±0.3 mm) than the older age group (mean 3.1±0.3 mm). Within the same age group though statistically not significant; males had thicker mucosa than females. From the canine to second premolar areas and in the sites furthest from the gingival margin mucosa thickness increased. When correlated with subject's BMI, in all probed sites males demonstrated significantly a thicker mucosa than females. Within each group subjects with high BMI demonstrated thicker donor mucosa. CONCLUSION Current study showed that in both adult and young individuals, premolar and canine areas can be the right site for harvesting donor tissue. Even in young subjects subepithelial connective tissue (CT) graft can be harvested in adequate volume. Donor tissue thickness can be influenced by factors like genetics and race, which need to be further evaluated. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE Premolar and canine areas serve as appropriate choice to harvest palatal masticatory mucosa. Even in young patients the volume of donor tissue available is sufficient enough to consider the subepithelial CT graft procedure. Donor tissue thickness can be influenced by factors like genetics and race, which need to be further evaluated.

[1]  R. Langlais,et al.  Buccal and palatal exostoses: prevalence and concurrence with tori. , 2000, Oral surgery, oral medicine, oral pathology, oral radiology, and endodontics.

[2]  A. Heinecke,et al.  Thickness of masticatory mucosa. , 2000, Journal of clinical periodontology.

[3]  H. Müller,et al.  Ultrasonic determination of thickness of masticatory mucosa: a methodologic study. , 1999, Oral surgery, oral medicine, oral pathology, oral radiology, and endodontics.

[4]  M. Cohen,et al.  Palatal tubercles, palatal tori, and mandibular tori: prevalence and anatomical features in a U.S. population. , 1999, Journal of periodontology.

[5]  R. Lawson,et al.  An Evaluation of a Noninvasive Method of Assessing Alveolar Bone Levels in an Experimental Model of Cleft Lip and Palate , 1998 .

[6]  S. Studer,et al.  The thickness of masticatory mucosa in the human hard palate and tuberosity as potential donor sites for ridge augmentation procedures. , 1997, Journal of periodontology.

[7]  P. Mahan,et al.  The subepithelial connective tissue graft palatal donor site: anatomic considerations for surgeons. , 1996, The International journal of periodontics & restorative dentistry.

[8]  B. Mealey,et al.  Use of furcal bone sounding to improve accuracy of furcation diagnosis. , 1994, Journal of periodontology.

[9]  R. L. Beatty,et al.  Intraoral Palatal Mucosal Graft Harvest , 1993, Ophthalmic plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[10]  D. Tse,et al.  Management of lower-lid retraction with hard-palate mucosa grafting. , 1990, Archives of ophthalmology.

[11]  T. Nakajima,et al.  Tracheoplasty with palatal mucoperiosteal graft. , 1990, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[12]  M Nagao,et al.  Measurement in vivo of Masticatory Mucosal Thickness with 20 MHz B-Mode Ultrasonic Diagnostic Equipment , 1989, Journal of dental research.

[13]  M. Ursell Relationships between alveolar bone levels measured at surgery, estimated by transgingival probing and clinical attachment level measurements. , 1989, Journal of clinical periodontology.

[14]  P. Miller,et al.  Root coverage with the free gingival graft. Factors associated with incomplete coverage. , 1987, Journal of periodontology.

[15]  T. Terakura [Non-invasive measurement of the thickness of oral soft tissues]. , 1986, Nihon Hotetsu Shika Gakkai zasshi.

[16]  Kenji Sawada,et al.  Development and application of an ultrasonic imaging system for dental diagnosis , 1985, Journal of clinical ultrasound : JCU.

[17]  Seibert Js Reconstruction of deformed, partially edentulous ridges, using full thickness onlay grafts. Part I. Technique and wound healing. , 1983 .

[18]  T. Vecchione Palatal grafts for lip reconstruction. , 1983 .

[19]  Rosenberg Es,et al.  The edentulous ridge in fixed prosthodontics. , 1981 .

[20]  E. Rosenberg,et al.  The edentulous ridge in fixed prosthodontics. , 1981, The Compendium of continuing education in dentistry.

[21]  E. Rosenberg,et al.  The free autogenous gingival graft. , 1980, Dental clinics of North America.

[22]  J. Maynard,et al.  Diagnosis and management of mucogingival problems in children. , 1980, Dental clinics of North America.

[23]  L Abrams,et al.  Augmentation of the deformed residual edentulous ridge for fixed prosthesis. , 1980, The Compendium on continuing education in general dentistry.

[24]  B. Fitzpatrick Free full thickness mucosal grafts in the mouth. , 1976, Australian dental journal.

[25]  J. Maynard,et al.  Mucogingival problems, prevalence and therapy in children. , 1975, Journal of periodontology.

[26]  C. Daly,et al.  The use of ultra-sonic thickness measurement in the clinical evaluation of the oral soft tissues. , 1971, International dental journal.

[27]  Hall Hd,et al.  Free grafts of palatal mucosa in mandibular vestibuloplasty. , 1970 .

[28]  H. Hall,et al.  Free grafts of palatal mucosa in mandibular vestibuloplasty. , 1970, Journal of oral surgery.

[29]  D. Turck,et al.  A HISTOLOGIC COMPARISON OF THE EDENTULOUS DENTURE AND NON-DENTURE BEARING TISSUES. , 1965, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[30]  S. Östlund The Effect of Complete Dentures on the Gum Tissues , 1958 .

[31]  R. Lytle The management of abused oral tissues in complete denture construction , 1957 .

[32]  Elbert C. Pendleton,et al.  The Minute Anatomy of the Denture Bearing Area , 1934 .