Environmental and cost life cycle analysis of the impact of using solar systems in energy renovation of Southern European single-family buildings

Abstract Nowadays, in the European Union (EU) the construction rate of new buildings is very low and therefore achieving the EU targets regarding the energy efficiency of the building sector is only possible through the reduction of the energy needs of the existing building stock. A building design based on passive measures is a priority to reduce operational energy consumption but it is not enough to achieve the nearly Zero Energy Building (nZEB) level. Consequently, the design must also consider active systems with high efficiency and the use of renewable energy sources to partially/totally replace the use of non-renewable energy. At this level, solar thermal and photovoltaic panels play an important role, mainly in countries with high levels of solar radiation, as in the Southern European countries. Nevertheless, there are still some barriers to overcome for the broader dissemination of the implementation of these systems. One of the most important is that building owners are not fully aware of the life cycle benefits that these systems have at environmental and economic levels. The best way to raise awareness to these benefits is through the analysis of case studies, highlighting the short or mid-term benefits resulting from the integration of these active solutions. Thus, this paper is aimed at analysing the environmental and life cycle costs of different energy renovation scenarios, assessing the contribution of the solar systems to achieve three levels of energy performance. The study is focused on the energy renovation of a detached single-family house considering the climatic conditions of Porto, Portugal. From the results, it is possible to conclude that, on an annual basis, and for the Portuguese climate, it is possible to overcome, many of the energy needs for acclimatization and preparation of domestic hot water with the integration of these systems. The study also shows attractive economic and carbon payback times resulting from their use.

[1]  Ahmad Zahedi,et al.  Maximizing solar PV energy penetration using energy storage technology , 2011 .

[2]  Fausto Freire,et al.  Life-cycle assessment of a house with alternative exterior walls: Comparison of three impact assessment methods , 2012 .

[3]  S. Iniyan,et al.  A review of climate change, mitigation and adaptation , 2012 .

[4]  Mark Richard Wilby,et al.  Setting up GHG-based energy efficiency targets in buildings: The Ecolabel , 2013 .

[5]  Marco António Pedrosa Santos Ferreira,et al.  Comparing cost-optimal and net-zero energy targets in building retrofit , 2016 .

[6]  Cristian Dinca,et al.  A life-cycle cost analysis of the passive house “POLITEHNICA” from Bucharest , 2014 .

[7]  Girish Kumar Singh,et al.  Solar power generation by PV (photovoltaic) technology: A review , 2013 .

[8]  Lars Junghans,et al.  Evaluation of the economic and environmental feasibility of heat pump systems in residential buildings, with varying qualities of the building envelope , 2015 .

[9]  Luís Bragança,et al.  Sustainability assessment of an innovative lightweight building technology for partition walls – Comparison with conventional technologies , 2013 .

[10]  Rasmus Lund Jensen,et al.  On-site or off-site renewable energy supply options? Life cycle cost analysis of a Net Zero Energy Building in Denmark , 2012 .

[11]  Lin Lu,et al.  Environmental payback time analysis of a roof-mounted building-integrated photovoltaic (BIPV) system in Hong Kong , 2010 .

[12]  Spiros Papaefthimiou,et al.  Comparative experimental Life Cycle Assessment of two commercial solar thermal devices for domestic applications , 2017 .

[13]  Gilles Notton,et al.  The environmental performance of a building-integrated solar thermal collector, based on multiple approaches and life-cycle impact assessment methodologies. , 2015 .

[14]  Ricardo Mateus,et al.  Sustainability assessment and rating of buildings: Developing the methodology SBTool PTH , 2011 .

[15]  S. Kalogirou Thermal performance, economic and environmental life cycle analysis of thermosiphon solar water heaters , 2009 .

[16]  M. Ramos,et al.  Contribution of the solar systems to the nZEB and ZEB design concept in Portugal: energy, economics and environmental life-cycle analysis , 2016 .

[17]  Italo Meroni,et al.  LCA study and testing of a photovoltaic ceramic tile prototype , 2015 .

[18]  Eva Krídlová Burdová,et al.  Sustainability Assessment of Family House , 2016 .

[19]  Shady Attia,et al.  Principles for nearly Zero-energy Buildings: Paving the way for effective implementation of policy requirements , 2011 .

[20]  Manuela Guedes de Almeida,et al.  Review and perspectives on Life Cycle Analysis of solar technologies with emphasis on building-integrated solar thermal systems , 2015 .

[21]  Françoise Bartiaux,et al.  A practice–theory approach to homeowners' energy retrofits in four European areas , 2014 .

[22]  Valerio Lo Brano,et al.  Life cycle assessment of a solar thermal collector: sensitivity analysis, energy and environmental balances , 2005 .

[23]  Marco António Pedrosa Santos Ferreira,et al.  Cost-optimal energy efficiency levels are the first step in achieving cost effective renovation in residential buildings with a nearly-zero energy target , 2016 .

[24]  Bin Song,et al.  LCAs of a polycrystalline photovoltaic module and a wind turbine , 2011 .

[25]  V. Fernao Pires,et al.  Economic assessment of residential PV systems with self-consumption and storage in Portugal , 2017 .

[26]  Nasrudin Abd Rahim,et al.  Progress in solar PV technology: Research and achievement , 2013 .

[27]  J. F. Armendariz-Lopez,et al.  Life cycle cost of photovoltaic technologies in commercial buildings in Baja California, Mexico , 2016 .

[28]  A. Fuentes,et al.  Life-cycle savings for a flat-plate solar water collector plant in Chile , 2017 .

[29]  English Version,et al.  Sustainability of construction works - Assessment of environmental performance of buildings - Calculation method , 2010 .

[30]  Georgios Martinopoulos,et al.  Life cycle environmental impact of a thermosyphonic domestic solar hot water system in comparison with electrical and gas water heating , 2004 .

[31]  Marco António Pedrosa Santos Ferreira,et al.  Cost optimality and net-zero energy in the renovation of Portuguese residential building stock – Rainha Dona Leonor neighbourhood case study , 2014 .

[32]  Sumiani Yusoff,et al.  A review of life cycle assessment method for building industry , 2015 .

[33]  Rita Puig,et al.  Environmental assessment of small-scale production of wood chips as a fuel for residential heating boilers , 2014 .

[34]  José Dinis Silvestre,et al.  Comparative environmental life cycle assessment of thermal insulation materials of buildings , 2014 .