Reduced-Frequency Concurrent and Terminal Feedback: A Test of the Guidance Hypothesis

Abstract In 2 experiments, the authors manipulated the frequency of concurrent feedback to discern the effects on learning. In each experiment, participants (N = 48, Experiment 1; N = 36, Experiment 2) attempted to reproduce a criterion force-production waveform (5 s in duration) presented on the computer monitor. Consistent with the guidance hypothesis, the results of Experiment 1 indicated very strong guiding effects of concurrent feedback and strong dependence on the feedback, as indicated by participants' extremely poor performance upon feedback withdrawal in retention. As predicted by the guidance hypothesis, dependence on the feedback was reduced as a result of reducing the frequency of the concurrent feedback. The results of Experiment 2 indicated that one can enhance learning by providing concurrent and terminal feedback on 1 trial, with no feedback on the subsequent trial. In that way, the strong guiding effects of concurrent feedback could be realized and the beneficial effects of terminal feedback could also be achieved.

[1]  D. V. Vander Linden,et al.  The effect of frequency of kinetic feedback on learning an isometric force production task in nondisabled subjects. , 1993, Physical therapy.

[2]  W A Sparrow,et al.  Performance on trials without knowledge results (KR) in reduced relative frequency presentations of KR. , 1992, Journal of motor behavior.

[3]  Timothy D. Lee,et al.  Effects of Aging and Reduced Relative Frequency of Knowledge of Results on Learning a Motor Skill , 1997, Perceptual and motor skills.

[4]  Stephan P. Swinnen,et al.  Summary knowledge of results for skill acquisition: support for the guidance hypothesis , 1989 .

[5]  C H Shea,et al.  Summary knowledge of results. , 1991, Research quarterly for exercise and sport.

[6]  R. Schmidt,et al.  Augmented Kinematic Feedback for Motor Learning. , 1992, Journal of motor behavior.

[7]  C H Shea,et al.  Generalized Motor Program (GMP) Learning: Effects of Reduced Frequency of Knowledge of Results and Practice Variability. , 1998, Journal of motor behavior.

[8]  C. Shea,et al.  Frequent feedback enhances complex motor skill learning. , 1998, Journal of motor behavior.

[9]  Robert A. Bjork,et al.  Optimum rehearsal patterns and name learning , 1978 .

[10]  C H Shea,et al.  The role of reduced frequency of knowledge of results during constant practice. , 1999, Research quarterly for exercise and sport.

[11]  D. C. Shapiro,et al.  Information Feedback for Skill Acquisition: Instantaneous Knowledge of Results Degrades Learning , 1990 .

[12]  Richard A. Schmidt,et al.  Optimizing summary knowledge of results for skill learning , 1990 .

[13]  J. Adams,et al.  A closed-loop theory of motor learning. , 1971, Journal of motor behavior.

[14]  Gabriele Wulf,et al.  Continuous Concurrent Feedback Degrades Skill Learning: Implications for Training and Simulation , 1997, Hum. Factors.

[15]  H Carnahan,et al.  A noted on the relationship between task requirements and the contextual interference effect. , 1990, Journal of motor behavior.

[16]  R. Schmidt,et al.  Knowledge of results and motor learning: a review and critical reappraisal. , 1984, Psychological bulletin.

[17]  C. Winstein,et al.  Learning a partial-weight-bearing skill: effectiveness of two forms of feedback. , 1996, Physical Therapy.

[18]  R. Schmidt A schema theory of discrete motor skill learning. , 1975 .

[19]  J. J. Lavery Retention of simple motor skills as a function of type of knowledge of results. , 1962 .

[20]  J. Adams Historical review and appraisal of research on the learning, retention, and transfer of human motor skills. , 1987 .

[21]  John Annett,et al.  Knowledge of results and skilled performance. , 1957 .

[22]  D E Sherwood,et al.  Effect of Bandwidth Knowledge of Results on Movement Consistency , 1988, Perceptual and motor skills.

[23]  Robert A. Bjork,et al.  Retrieval practice and the maintenance of knowledge. , 1988 .

[24]  C. Winstein,et al.  Effects of physical guidance and knowledge of results on motor learning: support for the guidance hypothesis. , 1994, Research quarterly for exercise and sport.

[25]  Richard A. Schmidt,et al.  Frequent Augmented Feedback Can Degrade Learning: Evidence and Interpretations , 1991 .

[26]  K. Newell Knowledge Of Results And Motor Learning , 1976, Exercise and sport sciences reviews.

[27]  Stanley N. Roscoe,et al.  Transfer Of Landing Skill After Training With Supplementary Visual Cues , 1978, Optics & Photonics.

[28]  P. Dunham,et al.  Effect of Fading Knowledge of Results on Acquisition, Retention, and Transfer of a Simple Motor Task , 1993, Perceptual and motor skills.

[29]  H Carnahan,et al.  On the role of knowledge of results in motor learning: exploring the guidance hypothesis. , 1990, Journal of motor behavior.

[30]  W. A. Sparrow Acquisition and retention effects of reduced relative frequency of knowledge of results , 1995 .

[31]  R. Schmidt,et al.  Reduced frequency of knowledge of results enhances motor skill learning. , 1990 .

[32]  R. Magill,et al.  American Psychological Association, Inc. The Locus of Contextual Interference in Motor-Skill Acquisition i , 2022 .

[33]  Richard A. Schmidt,et al.  Scheduling Information Feedback to Enhance Training Effectiveness , 1991 .

[34]  D. C. Shapiro,et al.  Summary knowledge of results for skill acquisition: support for the guidance hypothesis. , 1989, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[35]  C. Winstein Knowledge of results and motor learning--implications for physical therapy. , 1991, Physical therapy.

[36]  G Wulf,et al.  Reduced feedback frequency enhances generalized motor program learning but not parameterization learning. , 1993, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[37]  M. Guadagnoli,et al.  The Scheduling of Knowledge of Results. , 1996, Journal of motor behavior.

[38]  R. A. Schmidt,et al.  Reducing Knowledge of Results About Relative Versus Absolute Timing: Differential Effects on Learning. , 1994, Journal of motor behavior.