Tensor based multichannel reconstruction for breast tumours identification from DCE-MRIs

A new methodology based on tensor algebra that uses a higher order singular value decomposition to perform three-dimensional voxel reconstruction from a series of temporal images obtained using dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI) is proposed. Principal component analysis (PCA) is used to robustly extract the spatial and temporal image features and simultaneously de-noise the datasets. Tumour segmentation on enhanced scaled (ES) images performed using a fuzzy C-means (FCM) cluster algorithm is compared with that achieved using the proposed tensorial framework. The proposed algorithm explores the correlations between spatial and temporal features in the tumours. The multi-channel reconstruction enables improved breast tumour identification through enhanced de-noising and improved intensity consistency. The reconstructed tumours have clear and continuous boundaries; furthermore the reconstruction shows better voxel clustering in tumour regions of interest. A more homogenous intensity distribution is also observed, enabling improved image contrast between tumours and background, especially in places where fatty tissue is imaged. The fidelity of reconstruction is further evaluated on the basis of five new qualitative metrics. Results confirm the superiority of the tensorial approach. The proposed reconstruction metrics should also find future applications in the assessment of other reconstruction algorithms.

[1]  Otis W. Brawley Risk-Based Mammography Screening: An Effort to Maximize the Benefits and Minimize the Harms , 2012, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[2]  Nico Karssemeijer,et al.  Volumetric Breast Density Estimation from Full-Field Digital Mammograms: A Validation Study , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[3]  Tamara G. Kolda,et al.  Tensor Decompositions and Applications , 2009, SIAM Rev..

[4]  Jong Hyo Kim,et al.  Multilevel analysis of spatiotemporal association features for differentiation of tumor enhancement patterns in breast DCE-MRI. , 2010, Medical physics.

[5]  Anant Madabhushi,et al.  Textural Kinetics: A Novel Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced (DCE)-MRI Feature for Breast Lesion Classification , 2011, Journal of Digital Imaging.

[6]  P. Taourel,et al.  Undiagnosed breast cancer at MR imaging: analysis of causes. , 2012, Radiology.

[7]  K. Verstraete,et al.  Bone and soft tissue tumors: the role of contrast agents for MR imaging. , 2000, European journal of radiology.

[8]  Jimeng Sun,et al.  Beyond streams and graphs: dynamic tensor analysis , 2006, KDD '06.

[9]  Paul S. Bradley,et al.  Scaling Clustering Algorithms to Large Databases , 1998, KDD.

[10]  B. Szabó,et al.  Neural network approach to the segmentation and classification of dynamic magnetic resonance images of the breast: Comparison with empiric and quantitative kinetic parameters1 , 2004 .

[11]  M V Knopp,et al.  Evaluation of angiogenesis and perfusion of bone marrow lesions: Role of semiquantitative and quantitative dynamic MRI , 1999, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[12]  Nico Karssemeijer,et al.  Automated localization of breast cancer in DCE-MRI , 2015, Medical Image Anal..

[13]  C. F. Beckmann,et al.  Tensorial extensions of independent component analysis for multisubject FMRI analysis , 2005, NeuroImage.

[14]  Anne L. Martel,et al.  Classification of Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Breast Lesions by Support Vector Machines , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[15]  B. Szabó,et al.  Neural network approach to the segmentation and classification of dynamic magnetic resonance images of the breast: comparison with empiric and quantitative kinetic parameters. , 2004, Academic radiology.

[16]  Andrzej Cichocki,et al.  Nonnegative Matrix and Tensor Factorization T , 2007 .

[17]  Karla K. Evans,et al.  If You Don’t Find It Often, You Often Don’t Find It: Why Some Cancers Are Missed in Breast Cancer Screening , 2013, PloS one.

[18]  Hon J. Yu,et al.  Selection of diagnostic features on breast MRI to differentiate between malignant and benign lesions using computer-aided diagnosis: differences in lesions presenting as mass and non-mass-like enhancement , 2009, European Radiology.

[19]  Nico Karssemeijer,et al.  Automated analysis of contrast enhancement in breast MRI lesions using mean shift clustering for ROI selection , 2007, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[20]  Karla Kerlikowske,et al.  Agreement of Mammographic Measures of Volumetric Breast Density to MRI , 2013, PloS one.

[21]  Tamara G. Kolda,et al.  Efficient MATLAB Computations with Sparse and Factored Tensors , 2007, SIAM J. Sci. Comput..

[22]  Pancras C W Hogendoorn,et al.  Soft-tissue tumors: value of static and dynamic gadopentetate dimeglumine-enhanced MR imaging in prediction of malignancy. , 2004, Radiology.

[23]  S. Bondari,et al.  The Role of Imaging Techniques in Diagnosis of Breast Cancer , 2012 .

[24]  Wei Wei,et al.  Comparing Performance of the CADstream and the DynaCAD Breast MRI CAD Systems , 2013, Journal of Digital Imaging.

[25]  Joos Vandewalle,et al.  A Multilinear Singular Value Decomposition , 2000, SIAM J. Matrix Anal. Appl..

[26]  E. Hauth,et al.  Quantitative 2- and 3-dimensional analysis of pharmacokinetic model-derived variables for breast lesions in dynamic, contrast-enhanced MR mammography. , 2008, European journal of radiology.

[27]  W. Eric L. Grimson,et al.  Adaptive Segmentation of MRI Data , 1995, CVRMed.

[28]  G. Beluffi,et al.  Breast MRI. Fundamentals and technical aspects , 2011, La radiologia medica.

[29]  Efstathios Karathanasis,et al.  Tumor Vascular Permeability to a Nanoprobe Correlates to Tumor-Specific Expression Levels of Angiogenic Markers , 2009, PloS one.

[30]  Chengyu Shi,et al.  SU‐GG‐T‐38: Dosimetry and Inverse Treatment Planning for 3D Intensity Modulated Brachytherapy , 2010 .

[31]  Franz Pfeiffer,et al.  Bi-Directional X-Ray Phase-Contrast Mammography , 2014, PloS one.

[32]  Yuanjie Zheng,et al.  STEP: Spatiotemporal enhancement pattern for MR-based breast tumor diagnosis , 2009 .

[33]  Anke Meyer-Bäse,et al.  Model-free visualization of suspicious lesions in breast MRI based on supervised and unsupervised learning , 2008, Eng. Appl. Artif. Intell..

[34]  A. Cichocki,et al.  Tensor decompositions for feature extraction and classification of high dimensional datasets , 2010 .

[35]  Anne L. Martel,et al.  Feature Selection in Computer-Aided Breast Cancer Diagnosis via Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Images , 2013, Journal of Digital Imaging.

[36]  L. Turnbull,et al.  Textural analysis of contrast‐enhanced MR images of the breast , 2003, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[37]  P. Baltzer,et al.  Diagnostic Performance of Breast Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Non-Calcified Equivocal Breast Findings: Results from a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis , 2016, PloS one.

[38]  Hiroyuki Abe,et al.  Breast cancer detected on an incident (second or subsequent) round of screening MRI: MRI features of false-negative cases. , 2013, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[39]  L. Tucker,et al.  Some mathematical notes on three-mode factor analysis , 1966, Psychometrika.

[40]  Erez Eyal,et al.  Model‐based and model‐free parametric analysis of breast dynamic‐contrast‐enhanced MRI , 2009, NMR in biomedicine.

[41]  Elizabeth A Morris,et al.  Rethinking breast cancer screening: ultra FAST breast magnetic resonance imaging. , 2014, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[42]  Matthijs Oudkerk,et al.  Computer-aided detection in breast MRI: a systematic review and meta-analysis , 2011, European Radiology.

[43]  Derek Abbott,et al.  Terahertz Imaging for Biomedical Applications: Pattern Recognition and Tomographic Reconstruction , 2012 .

[44]  Pieter M. Kroonenberg,et al.  Three-mode principal component analysis : theory and applications , 1983 .