Delay and Capacity Trade-Offs in Mobile Ad Hoc Networks: A Global Perspective

Since the original work of Grossglauser and Tse, which showed that mobility can increase the capacity of an ad hoc network, there has been a lot of interest in characterizing the delay-capacity relationship in ad hoc networks. Various mobility models have been studied in the literature, and the delay-capacity relationships under those models have been characterized. The results indicate that there are trade-offs between the delay and capacity, and that the nature of these trade-offs is strongly influenced by the choice of the mobility model. Some questions that arise are: (i) How representative are these mobility models studied in the literature? (ii) Can the delay-capacity relationship be significantly different under some other "reasonable" mobility model? (iii) What sort of delay-capacity trade-off are we likely to see in a real world scenario? In this paper, we take the first step toward answering some of these questions. In particular, we analyze, among others, the mobility models studied in recent related works, under a unified framework. We relate the nature of delay-capacity trade-off to the nature of node motion, thereby providing a better understanding of the delay-capacity relationship in ad hoc networks in comparison to earlier works.

[1]  David J. Aldous,et al.  Lower bounds for covering times for reversible Markov chains and random walks on graphs , 1989 .

[2]  Andrea J. Goldsmith,et al.  Large wireless networks under fading, mobility, and delay constraints , 2004, IEEE INFOCOM 2004.

[3]  Eytan Modiano,et al.  Capacity and delay tradeoffs for ad hoc mobile networks , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Information Theory.

[4]  Zygmunt J. Haas,et al.  Multipath routing in the presence of frequent topological changes , 2001, IEEE Commun. Mag..

[5]  Jean-Yves Le Boudec,et al.  Perfect simulation and stationarity of a class of mobility models , 2005, Proceedings IEEE 24th Annual Joint Conference of the IEEE Computer and Communications Societies..

[6]  Ahmed Helmy,et al.  IMPORTANT: a framework to systematically analyze the Impact of Mobility on Performance of Routing Protocols for Adhoc Networks , 2003, IEEE INFOCOM 2003. Twenty-second Annual Joint Conference of the IEEE Computer and Communications Societies (IEEE Cat. No.03CH37428).

[7]  Donald F. Towsley,et al.  On the capacity of hybrid wireless networks , 2003, IEEE INFOCOM 2003. Twenty-second Annual Joint Conference of the IEEE Computer and Communications Societies (IEEE Cat. No.03CH37428).

[8]  Panganamala Ramana Kumar,et al.  Towards an information theory of large networks: an achievable rate region , 2003, IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory.

[9]  Massimo Franceschetti,et al.  On the throughput capacity of random wireless networks , 2004 .

[10]  Zhen Liu,et al.  Capacity, delay and mobility in wireless ad-hoc networks , 2003, IEEE INFOCOM 2003. Twenty-second Annual Joint Conference of the IEEE Computer and Communications Societies (IEEE Cat. No.03CH37428).

[11]  Michael J. Neely,et al.  Dynamic power allocation and routing for satellite and wireless networks with time varying channels , 2003 .

[12]  Panganamala Ramana Kumar,et al.  Capacity bounds for ad hoc and hybrid wireless networks , 2004, CCRV.

[13]  Ravi Mazumdar,et al.  Scaling laws for capacity and delay in wireless ad hoc networks with random mobility , 2004, 2004 IEEE International Conference on Communications (IEEE Cat. No.04CH37577).

[14]  Devavrat Shah,et al.  Throughput-delay trade-off in wireless networks , 2004, IEEE INFOCOM 2004.

[15]  Ness B. Shroff,et al.  Degenerate delay-capacity tradeoffs in ad-hoc networks with Brownian mobility , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Information Theory.

[16]  Sanjeev R. Kulkarni,et al.  Throughput scaling for heterogeneous networks , 2003, IEEE International Symposium on Information Theory, 2003. Proceedings..

[17]  David Tse,et al.  Mobility increases the capacity of ad hoc wireless networks , 2002, TNET.

[18]  Ness B. Shroff,et al.  Delay and Capacity Trade-Offs in Mobile Ad Hoc Networks: A Global Perspective , 2006, Proceedings IEEE INFOCOM 2006. 25TH IEEE International Conference on Computer Communications.

[19]  Donald F. Towsley,et al.  Properties of random direction models , 2005, Proceedings IEEE 24th Annual Joint Conference of the IEEE Computer and Communications Societies..

[20]  C.-K. Toh,et al.  A Survey of Handover Techniques for Wireless ATM Networks , 1998, Int. J. Wirel. Inf. Networks.

[21]  Ness B. Shroff,et al.  The Fundamental Capacity-Delay Tradeoff in Large Mobile Ad Hoc Networks , 2004 .

[22]  Panganamala Ramana Kumar,et al.  RHEINISCH-WESTFÄLISCHE TECHNISCHE HOCHSCHULE AACHEN , 2001 .

[23]  Rick S. Blum,et al.  Delay limited capacity of ad hoc networks: asymptotically optimal transmission and relaying strategy , 2003, IEEE INFOCOM 2003. Twenty-second Annual Joint Conference of the IEEE Computer and Communications Societies (IEEE Cat. No.03CH37428).

[24]  Panganamala Ramana Kumar,et al.  The transport capacity of wireless networks over fading channels , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Information Theory.