Residual motion perception in a "motion-blind" patient, assessed with limited-lifetime random dot stimuli

A neurological patient (L.M.) suffering a specific loss of visual motion perception (Zihl et al., 1983) due to extrastriate cortical damage was studied using random dot “limited-lifetime” stimuli with a direction discrimination task. With a stimulus like that of Newsome and Pare (1988), the patient exhibited a severe deficit for motion perception, only being able to perform well for very high values of coherence. Different versions of the stimulus were employed to separate out the effects of limited lifetime versus the effects of additive noise as coherence was lowered. When all “signal” dots had a fixed, specified value of lifetime, and varying percentages of “noise” dots were added, the patient showed a profound deficit. In contrast, a stimulus consisting of no noise dots at all, and signal dots having fixed values of lifetime, revealed relatively good performance for surprisingly brief dot lifetimes. Thus, it is the presence of noisy, incoherent dot motion, rather than brief lifetimes, that causes such poor performance on the stimulus of Newsome and Pare (1988). Most surprising was the finding that the presence of even very small percentages of stationary noise dots was sufficient to disrupt totally direction discrimination of moving signal dots. The findings reported here suggest that one major role of extrastriate cortical processing might be the interpretation of stimuli that suffer from an impaired signal-to-noise ratio; the most commonly encountered form of “noise” would presumably be contamination by irrelevant directional spatio- temporal frequency components.

[1]  W. Weibull A Statistical Distribution Function of Wide Applicability , 1951 .

[2]  S. Zeki,et al.  Response properties and receptive fields of cells in an anatomically defined region of the superior temporal sulcus in the monkey. , 1971, Brain research.

[3]  J. Kaas,et al.  A representation of the visual field in the caudal third of the middle tempral gyrus of the owl monkey (Aotus trivirgatus). , 1971, Brain research.

[4]  S. Zeki Functional organization of a visual area in the posterior bank of the superior temporal sulcus of the rhesus monkey , 1974, The Journal of physiology.

[5]  M. Cynader,et al.  Abolition of direction selectivity in the visual cortex of the cat. , 1976, Science.

[6]  M. Morgan,et al.  Conditions for motion flow in dynamic visual noise , 1980, Vision Research.

[7]  N. Mai,et al.  Selective disturbance of movement vision after bilateral brain damage. , 1983, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[8]  K. Nakayama,et al.  Temporal and spatial characteristics of the upper displacement limit for motion in random dots , 1984, Vision Research.

[9]  Robert Sekuler,et al.  Coherent global motion percepts from stochastic local motions , 1984, Vision Research.

[10]  J. van Santen,et al.  Elaborated Reichardt detectors. , 1985, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[11]  O J Braddick,et al.  Temporal Properties of the Short-Range Process in Apparent Motion , 1985, Perception.

[12]  Curtis L. Baker,et al.  Eccentricity-dependent scaling of the limits for short-range apparent motion perception , 1985, Vision Research.

[13]  W. Newsome,et al.  Motion selectivity in macaque visual cortex. II. Spatiotemporal range of directional interactions in MT and V1. , 1986, Journal of neurophysiology.

[14]  John H. R. Maunsell,et al.  Visual processing in monkey extrastriate cortex. , 1987, Annual review of neuroscience.

[15]  R. M. Siegel,et al.  Perception of three-dimensional structure from motion in monkey and man , 1988, Nature.

[16]  W. Newsome,et al.  A selective impairment of motion perception following lesions of the middle temporal visual area (MT) , 1988, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[17]  J Zihl,et al.  The "motion-blind" patient: low-level spatial and temporal filters , 1989, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[18]  O. J. Braddick,et al.  Extension of displacement limits in multiple-exposure sequences of apparent motion , 1989, Vision Research.

[19]  Robert J. Snowden,et al.  Differences in the processing of short-range apparent motion at small and large displacements , 1990, Vision Research.

[20]  N Mai,et al.  Disturbance of movement vision after bilateral posterior brain damage. Further evidence and follow up observations. , 1991, Brain : a journal of neurology.