Comparing Corrective and Preventive Security-Constrained DCOPF Problems Using Linear Shift-Factors

This study compares two efficient formulations to solve corrective as well as preventive security-constrained (SC) DC-based optimal power flow (OPF) problems using linear sensitivity factors without sacrificing optimality. Both SCOPF problems are modelled using two frameworks based on these distribution factors. The main advantage of the accomplished formulation is the significant reduction of decision variables and—equality and inequality—constraints in comparison with the traditional DC-based SCOPF formulation. Several test power systems and extensive computational experiments are conducted using a commercial solver to clearly demonstrate the feasibility to carry out the corrective and the preventive SCOPF problems with a reduced solution space. Another point worth noting is the lower simulation time achieved by the introduced methodology. Additionally, this study presents advantages and disadvantages for the proposed shift-factor formulation solving both corrective and preventive formulations.

[1]  J. Kalagnanam,et al.  Some Efficient Optimization Methods for Solving the Security-Constrained Optimal Power Flow Problem , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[2]  Victor Hinojosa,et al.  Preventive Security-Constrained DCOPF Formulation Using Power Transmission Distribution Factors and Line Outage Distribution Factors , 2018, Energies.

[3]  R. Adapa,et al.  A review of selected optimal power flow literature to 1993. I. Nonlinear and quadratic programming approaches , 1999 .

[4]  J. Ramos,et al.  State-of-the-art, challenges, and future trends in security constrained optimal power flow , 2011 .

[5]  A. Monticelli,et al.  Security-Constrained Optimal Power Flow with Post-Contingency Corrective Rescheduling , 1987, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[6]  Aouss Gabash,et al.  A Survey of Real-Time Optimal Power Flow , 2018, Energies.

[7]  Anne-Katrin Marten,et al.  Mixed AC high‐voltage direct current benchmark test system for security constrained optimal power flow calculation , 2017 .

[8]  Dzung T. Phan,et al.  Minimal Impact Corrective Actions in Security-Constrained Optimal Power Flow Via Sparsity Regularization , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[9]  Jose L. Martinez-Ramos,et al.  DC corrective optimal power flow based on generator and branch outages modelled as fictitious nodal injections , 2013 .

[10]  Gang Liu,et al.  Preventive Security-Constrained Optimal Power Flow Considering UPFC Control Modes , 2017 .

[11]  O. Alsac,et al.  Optimal Load Flow with Steady-State Security , 1974 .

[12]  C. R. Fuerte-Esquivel,et al.  A New Practical Approach to Transient Stability-Constrained Optimal Power Flow , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[13]  Victor Hinojosa,et al.  Improving the mathematical formulation of security-constrained generation capacity expansion planning using power transmission distribution factors and line outage distribution factors , 2016 .

[14]  Duehee Lee,et al.  Stochastic Dynamic AC Optimal Power Flow Based on a Multivariate Short-Term Wind Power Scenario Forecasting Model , 2017 .

[15]  Victor Hinojosa,et al.  Using Generalized Generation Distribution Factors in a MILP Model to Solve the Transmission-Constrained Unit Commitment Problem , 2018 .

[16]  Kyung Bin Song,et al.  Incorporating Charging/Discharging Strategy of Electric Vehicles into Security-Constrained Optimal Power Flow to Support High Renewable Penetration , 2017 .