Slowing down a pine invasion despite uncertainty in demography and dispersal

1. Management decisions regarding invasive plants often have to be made quickly and in the face of fragmentary knowledge of their population dynamics. However, recommendations are commonly made on the basis of only a restricted set of parameters. Without addressing uncertainty and variability in model parameters we risk ineffective management, resulting in wasted resources and an escalating problem if early chances to control spread are missed. 2. Using available data for Pinus nigra in ungrazed and grazed grassland and shrubland in New Zealand, we parameterized a stage-structured spread model to calculate invasion wave speed, population growth rate and their sensitivities and elasticities to population parameters. Uncertainty distributions of parameters were used with the model to generate confidence intervals (CI) about the model predictions. 3. Ungrazed grassland environments were most vulnerable to invasion and the highest elasticities and sensitivities of invasion speed were to long-distance dispersal parameters. However, there was overlap between the elasticity and sensitivity CI on juvenile survival, seedling establishment and long-distance dispersal parameters, indicating overlap in their effects on invasion speed. 4. While elasticity of invasion speed to long-distance dispersal was highest in shrubland environments, there was overlap with the CI of elasticity to juvenile survival. In shrubland invasion speed was most sensitive to the probability of establishment, especially when establishment was low. In the grazed environment elasticity and sensitivity of invasion speed to the severity of grazing were consistently highest. Management recommendations based on elasticities and sensitivities depend on the vulnerability of the habitat. 5. Synthesis and applications. Despite considerable uncertainty in demography and dispersal, robust management recommendations emerged from the model. Proportional or absolute reductions in long-distance dispersal, juvenile survival and seedling establishment parameters have the potential to reduce wave speed substantially. Plantations of wind-dispersed invasive conifers should not be sited on exposed sites vulnerable to long-distance dispersal events, and trees in these sites should be removed. Invasion speed can also be reduced by removing seedlings, establishing competitive shrubs and grazing. Incorporating uncertainty into the modelling process increases our confidence in the wide applicability of the management strategies recommended here.

[1]  Caz M Taylor,et al.  CONSEQUENCES OF AN ALLEE EFFECT IN THE INVASION OF A PACIFIC ESTUARY BY SPARTINA ALTERNIFLORA , 2004 .

[2]  Alan Hastings,et al.  Finding optimal control strategies for invasive species: a density‐structured model for Spartina alterniflora , 2004 .

[3]  Justin M. J. Travis,et al.  Spatial structure and the control of invasive alien species , 2004 .

[4]  M. Neubert,et al.  Projecting Rates of Spread for Invasive Species , 2004, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[5]  A. Sharov,et al.  Bioeconomics of Managing the Spread of Exotic Pest Species with Barrier Zones , 2004, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[6]  Y. Buckley,et al.  Modelling integrated weed management of an invasive shrub in tropical Australia , 2004 .

[7]  H. Akçakaya,et al.  Assessing human impact despite uncertainty:viability of the northern spotted owl metapopulation in the northwestern USA , 1998, Biodiversity & Conservation.

[8]  S. Levin,et al.  The Ecology and Evolution of Seed Dispersal: A Theoretical Perspective , 2003 .

[9]  H. Caswell,et al.  Demography and dispersal : life table response experiments for invasion speed , 2003 .

[10]  Janneke HilleRisLambers,et al.  ESTIMATING POPULATION SPREAD: WHAT CAN WE FORECAST AND HOW WELL? , 2003 .

[11]  D. T. Briese,et al.  Demography and management of the invasive plant species Hypericum perforatum. I. Using multi‐level mixed‐effects models for characterizing growth, survival and fecundity in a long‐term data set , 2003 .

[12]  S. Ellner,et al.  USING PVA FOR MANAGEMENT DESPITE UNCERTAINTY: EFFECTS OF HABITAT, HATCHERIES, AND HARVEST ON SALMON , 2003 .

[13]  Thomas Hovestadt,et al.  Forecasting plant migration rates: managing uncertainty for risk assessment , 2003 .

[14]  D. T. Briese,et al.  Demography and management of the invasive plant species Hypericum perforatum. II. Construction and use of an individual‐based model to predict population dynamics and the effects of management strategies , 2003 .

[15]  O. Tackenberg.  Modeling long‐distance dispersal of plant diaspores by wind , 2003 .

[16]  Philip E. Hulme,et al.  Biological invasions: winning the science battles but losing the conservation war? , 2003, Oryx.

[17]  S. Levin,et al.  Mechanisms of long-distance dispersal of seeds by wind , 2002, Nature.

[18]  M. Kot,et al.  Integrodifference equations, Allee effects, and invasions , 2002, Journal of mathematical biology.

[19]  Wesley Rodrigues Silva,et al.  Mechanistic models for tree seed dispersal by wind in dense forests and open landscapes. , 2002 .

[20]  R. Nathan,et al.  Long-distance dispersal of tree seeds by wind , 2001, Ecological Research.

[21]  James S. Clark,et al.  Invasion by Extremes: Population Spread with Variation in Dispersal and Reproduction , 2001, The American Naturalist.

[22]  N. Ledgard.  The spread of lodgepole pine (Pinus contorta, Dougl.) in New Zealand , 2001 .

[23]  Imon,et al.  Mechanistic models for tree seed dispersal by wind in dense forests and open landscapes , 2001 .

[24]  Ran Nathan,et al.  Spatial patterns of seed dispersal, their determinants and consequences for recruitment. , 2000, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[25]  Hal Caswell,et al.  DEMOGRAPHY AND DISPERSAL: CALCULATION AND SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS OF INVASION SPEED FOR STRUCTURED POPULATIONS , 2000 .

[26]  I. Parker.  Invasion dynamics of Cytisus scoparius: a matrix model approach. , 2000 .

[27]  H. Kroon,et al.  ELASTICITIES: A REVIEW OF METHODS AND MODEL LIMITATIONS , 2000 .

[28]  H. McCallum,et al.  Population Parameters: Estimation for Ecological Models , 2000 .

[29]  Hal Caswell,et al.  HARBOR PORPOISE AND FISHERIES: AN UNCERTAINTY ANALYSIS OF INCIDENTAL MORTALITY , 1998 .

[30]  Katriona Shea,et al.  ESTIMATING BIOCONTROL AGENT IMPACT WITH MATRIX MODELS: CARDUUS NUTANS IN NEW ZEALAND , 1998 .

[31]  Alexei A. Sharov,et al.  BIOECONOMICS OF MANAGING THE SPREAD OFEXOTIC PEST SPECIES WITH BARRIER ZONES , 1998 .

[32]  James S. Clark,et al.  Why Trees Migrate So Fast: Confronting Theory with Dispersal Biology and the Paleorecord , 1998, The American Naturalist.

[33]  J. Keeley,et al.  Evolution of life histories in Pinus , 1998 .

[34]  R. Price.  Phylogeny and systematics of Pinus , 1998 .

[35]  D. Richardson,et al.  Ecology and biogeography of Pinus: an introduction , 1998 .

[36]  M. Rees,et al.  Biological control of Scotch broom : modelling the determinants of abundance and the potential impact of introduced insect herbivores , 1997 .

[37]  P. Driessche,et al.  Dispersal data and the spread of invading organisms. , 1996 .

[38]  D. Richardson,et al.  Pine invasions in the Southern Hemisphere: Determinants of spread and invadability , 1994 .

[39]  G. MacDonald.  Fossil Pollen Analysis and the Reconstruction of Plant Invasions , 1993 .

[40]  P. Holgate,et al.  Matrix Population Models. , 1990 .

[41]  R. Allen,et al.  Seedling establishment microsites of exotic conifers in Chionochloa rigida tussock grassland, Otago, New Zealand , 1989 .

[42]  John Hinde,et al.  Statistical Modelling in GLIM. , 1989 .

[43]  Richard N. Mack,et al.  Controlling the spread of plant invasions: The importance of nascent foci. , 1988 .

[44]  J. Miller,et al.  Introduced forest trees in New Zealand: recognition, role, and seed source. 1. Pinus nigra Arn. - European black pine. , 1986 .