Is International Emissions Trading Always Beneficial?

Economic efficiency is a major argument for international emissions trading under the Kyoto Protocol. We show that permit trading can be welfare decreasing for countries, even though private trading parties benefit. The result is a case of "immiserizing" growth in the sense of Bhagwati where the negative terms of trade and tax interaction effects wipe out the gains from trading. Simulation and welfare decomposition results based on a CGE model of the global economy show that under EU-wide trading countries that are net permit sellers generally lose, due primarily to the existence of distortionary energy taxes.

[1]  Patrick Criqui,et al.  Marginal abatement costs of CO2 emission reductions, geographical flexibility and concrete ceilings: an assessment using the POLES model , 1999 .

[2]  A. Charnes,et al.  Some Models for Estimating Technical and Scale Inefficiencies in Data Envelopment Analysis , 1984 .

[3]  D. Fullerton.  Reconciling Recent Estimates of the Marginal Welfare Cost of Taxation , 1991 .

[4]  L. Chennells.  The Windfall Tax , 1997 .

[5]  D. Newbery.  Harmonizing Energy Taxes in the EU , 2022 .

[6]  R. Bartels,et al.  The Effect of Sample Size on the Mean Efficiency in DEA with an Application to Electricity Distribution in Australia, Sweden and New Zealand , 1998 .

[7]  Tooraj Jamasb,et al.  International benchmarking and regulation: an application to European electricity distribution utilities , 2003 .

[8]  International Economics sixth edition , 1983 .

[9]  Don Fullerton,et al.  Environmental Controls, Scarcity Rents, and Pre-Existing Distortions , 1997 .

[10]  John M. Reilly,et al.  Effects of differentiating climate policy by sector : a United States example , 2000 .

[11]  F. Knight.  Some Fallacies in the Interpretation of Social Cost , 1924 .

[12]  Sergio Perelman,et al.  A comparison of parametric and non-parametric distance functions: With application to European railways , 1999, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[13]  I. Wing,et al.  Supplementarity: An Invitation to Monopsony? , 2000 .

[14]  A. Denny Ellerman,et al.  Analysis of post-Kyoto CO₂ emissions trading using marginal abatement curves , 1998 .

[15]  Michael G. Pollitt,et al.  Ownership and Performance in Electric Utilities , 1998 .

[16]  Ned Greene,et al.  Performance Based Ratemaking for Electric Utilities: Review of Plans and Analysis of Economic and Re , 1995 .

[17]  Michael G. Pollitt,et al.  The restructuring and privatisation of the electricity distribution and supply businesses in England and Wales: a social cost-benefit analysis , 2005 .

[18]  L. G. Neuberg,et al.  Two issues in the municipal ownership of electric power distribution systems. [Statistical/econometric scrutiny] , 1977 .

[19]  Emmanuel Thanassoulis,et al.  Introduction to the theory and application of data envelopment analysis , 2001 .

[20]  Richard S. Eckaus,et al.  The MIT Emissions Prediction and Policy Analysis (EPPA) model : revisions, sensitivities, and comparisons of results , 2001 .

[21]  J. Bhagwati,et al.  Foreign Ownership and the Theory of Trade and Welfare , 1981, Journal of Political Economy.

[22]  Charles L. Ballard,et al.  General Equilibrium Computations of the Marginal Welfare Costs of Taxes in the United States , 1985 .

[23]  R. Lipsey,et al.  The General Theory of Second Best , 1956 .

[24]  J. Bhagwati,et al.  Tariff change, foreign capital and immiserization: A theoretical analysis , 1980 .

[25]  Ian W. H. Parry,et al.  A second-best evaluation of eight policy instruments to reduce carbon emissions , 1999 .

[26]  John M. Reilly,et al.  Assessing the Impact of Carbon Tax Differentiation in the European Union , 2003 .

[27]  J. Bhagwati.  Distortions and Immiserizing Growth: a Generalization , 1968 .

[28]  Warwick J. McKibbin,et al.  Journal of Economic Perspectives—Volume 16, Number 2—Spring 2002—Pages 107–129 The Role of Economics in Climate Change Policy , 2022 .

[29]  Abraham Charnes,et al.  Measuring the efficiency of decision making units , 1978 .

[30]  M. Farrell.  The Measurement of Productive Efficiency , 1957 .

[31]  W. Cooper,et al.  Data Envelopment Analysis: A Comprehensive Text with Models, Applications, References and DEA-Solver Software , 1999 .

[32]  John M. Reilly,et al.  The costs of the Kyoto protocol in the European Union , 2003 .

[33]  John M. Reilly,et al.  Carbon emissions and the Kyoto commitment in the European Union , 2001 .

[34]  Rajiv D. Banker,et al.  Efficiency Analysis for Exogenously Fixed Inputs and Outputs , 1986, Oper. Res..

[35]  J. Bhagwati,et al.  Immiserizing transfers from abroad , 1982 .

[36]  T. Wälde.  The International Energy Agency (IEA) , 2003 .

[37]  J. Bhagwati.  Optimal Policies and Immiserizing Growth , 1969 .

[39]  L. Goulder,et al.  Effects of Carbon Taxes in an Economy with Prior Tax Distortions: An Intertemporal General Equilibrium Analysis , 1995 .

[40]  Christoph Böhringer,et al.  Industry-level emission trading between power producers in the EU , 2002 .

[41]  Sergey Paltsev,et al.  Russia's Role in the Kyoto Protocol , 2003 .

[42]  P. Wilcoxen,et al.  What to expect from an international system of tradable permits for carbon emissions , 1999 .

[43]  H. Johnson.  The Possibility of Income Losses From Increased Efficiency or Factor Accumulation in the Presence of Tariffs , 1967 .

[44]  Thomas G. Weyman-Jones,et al.  COST FUNCTIONS AND COST EFFICIENCY IN ELECTRICITY DISTRIBUTION: A STOCHASTIC FRONTIER APPROACH , 1996 .

[45]  Jagdish N. Bhagwati,et al.  Immiserizing Growth: A Geometrical Note , 1958 .

[46]  M. Pollitt,et al.  Benchmarking and regulation: international electricity experience , 2000 .

[47]  Lennart Hjalmarsson,et al.  On the Measurement of Productive Efficiency , 1974 .

[48]  Dallas Burtraw,et al.  The Cost-Effectiveness of Alternative Instruments for Environmental Protection in a Second-Best Setting , 1998 .

[49]  Mika Goto,et al.  Comparison of Productive and Cost Efficiencies Among Japanese and US Electric Utilities , 1998 .

[50]  Alain Haurie,et al.  A Stochastic Dynamic Game of Carbon Emissions Trading , 2003 .

[51]  I. Wing,et al.  Adjustment Time, Capital Malleability and Policy Cost , 1999 .

[52]  R. Färe,et al.  Productivity Developments in Swedish Hospitals: A Malmquist Output Index Approach , 1994 .

[53]  Edgar K. Browning.  On the Marginal Welfare Cost of Taxation , 1987 .

[54]  J. Melillo,et al.  Multi-gas assessment of the Kyoto Protocol , 1999, Nature.

[55]  D. Newbery.  Should Carbon Taxes Be Additional to Other Transport Fuel Taxes? , 1992 .

[56]  Paul L. Joskow,et al.  Incentive Regulation For Electric Utilities , 1986 .

[57]  Bruce Hollingsworth,et al.  Use of ratios in data envelopment analysis , 2003 .

[58]  International Emissions Trading , 2001 .

[59]  Edgar K. Browning.  The Marginal Cost of Public Funds , 1976, Journal of Political Economy.

[60]  John M. Reilly,et al.  The Kyoto Protocol and Developing Countries , 1999 .

[61]  Philippe Vanden Eeckaut,et al.  Non-parametric efficiency, progress and regress measures for panel data: Methodological aspects☆ , 1995 .

[62]  J. Bhagwati.  The Generalized Theory of Distortions and Welfare , 1969 .

[63]  A. Shleifer,et al.  A Theory of Yardstick Competition , 1985 .

[64]  C. Kindleberger,et al.  Trade, balance of payments and growth : papers in international economics in honor of Charles P. Kindleberger , 1973 .

[65]  A. Denny Ellerman,et al.  CO2 Emissions Limits: Economic Adjustments and the Distribution of Burdens , 1997 .

[66]  Laurent Viguier,et al.  Joint Program on the Science and Policy of Global Change Fair Trade and Harmonization of Climate Change Policies in Europe , 2000 .

[67]  Reform of the Electricity Supply Industry , 1999 .

[68]  J. Dales,et al.  Land, Water, and Ownership , 1968 .

[69]  P. Navarro.  International Comparisons of Electricity Regulation: The Japanese electric utility industry , 1996 .

[70]  G. Battese,et al.  A model for technical inefficiency effects in a stochastic frontier production function for panel data , 1995 .

[71]  T. Coelli,et al.  Accounting for Environmental Influences in Stochastic Frontier Models: With Application to International Airlines , 1999 .