Hemiparetic Stroke Rehabilitation Using Avatar and Electrical Stimulation Basedon Non-invasive Brain Computer Interface

Brain computer interfaces (BCIs) have been employed in rehabilitation training for post-stroke patients. Patients in the chronic stage, and/or with severe paresis, are particularly challenging for conventional rehabilitation. We present results from two such patients who participated in BCI training with first-person avatar feedback. Five assessments were conducted to assess any behavioural changes after the intervention, including the upper extremity Fugl-Meyer assessment (UE-FMA) and 9 hole-peg test (9HPT). Patient 1 (P1) increased his UE-FMA score from 25 to 46 points after the intervention. He could not perform the 9HPT in the first session. After the 18th session, he was able to perform the 9HPT and reduced the time from 10 min 22 sec to 2 min 53 sec. Patient 2 (P2) increased her UE-FMA from 17 to 28 points after the intervention. She could not perform the 9HPT throughout the training session. However, she managed to complete the test in 17 min 17 sec during the post-assessment session. These results show that the feasibility of this BCI approach with chronic patients with severe paresis, and further support the growing consensus that these types of tools might develop into a new paradigm for rehabilitation tool for stroke patients. However, the results are from only two chronic stroke patients. This approach should be further validated in broader randomized controlled studies involving more patients.

[1]  Li-ling Chuang,et al.  Responsiveness and validity of three dexterous function measures in stroke rehabilitation. , 2010, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[2]  M. Nicholas,et al.  Language Rehabilitation in Chronic Aphasia and Time Postonset: A Review of Single-Subject Data , 2006, Stroke.

[3]  A. Behrman,et al.  Chronic motor dysfunction after stroke: recovering wrist and finger extension by electromyography-triggered neuromuscular stimulation. , 2000, Stroke.

[4]  L. Cohen,et al.  Brain–machine interface in chronic stroke rehabilitation: A controlled study , 2013, Annals of neurology.

[5]  John Chae,et al.  A Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing EMG-Triggered, Cyclic, and Sensory Electrical Stimulation , 2019, Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation.

[6]  S. G. Nelson,et al.  Reliability of the Fugl-Meyer assessment of sensorimotor recovery following cerebrovascular accident. , 1983, Physical therapy.

[7]  L. Der-Yeghiaian,et al.  Robot-based hand motor therapy after stroke. , 2007, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[8]  K.-R. Muller,et al.  Optimizing Spatial filters for Robust EEG Single-Trial Analysis , 2008, IEEE Signal Processing Magazine.

[9]  B. Allison,et al.  Paired Associative Stimulation Using Brain-Computer Interfaces for Stroke Rehabilitation: A Pilot Study , 2016, European journal of translational myology.

[10]  P. Stratford,et al.  Reliability of the Fugl-Meyer assessment for testing motor performance in patients following stroke. , 1993, Physical therapy.

[11]  G. Alon,et al.  Functional Electrical Stimulation (FES) May Modify the Poor Prognosis of Stroke Survivors with Severe Motor Loss of the Upper Extremity: A Preliminary Study , 2008, American journal of physical medicine & rehabilitation.

[12]  Vivek Prabhakaran,et al.  A review of the progression and future implications of brain-computer interface therapies for restoration of distal upper extremity motor function after stroke , 2016, Expert review of medical devices.

[13]  M. Molinari,et al.  Brain–computer interface boosts motor imagery practice during stroke recovery , 2015, Annals of neurology.

[14]  M. Fornage,et al.  Heart Disease and Stroke Statistics—2017 Update: A Report From the American Heart Association , 2017, Circulation.

[15]  Cuntai Guan,et al.  Brain-computer interface-based robotic end effector system for wrist and hand rehabilitation: results of a three-armed randomized controlled trial for chronic stroke , 2014, Front. Neuroeng..

[16]  Akio Kimura,et al.  Brain-computer interface with somatosensory feedback improves functional recovery from severe hemiplegia due to chronic stroke , 2014, Front. Neuroeng..

[17]  Rong Song,et al.  A Comparison Between Electromyography-Driven Robot and Passive Motion Device on Wrist Rehabilitation for Chronic Stroke , 2009, Neurorehabilitation and neural repair.

[18]  J. Mehrholz,et al.  Computerized Arm Training Improves the Motor Control of the Severely Affected Arm After Stroke: A Single-Blinded Randomized Trial in Two Centers , 2005, Stroke.

[19]  C. Baird,et al.  The pilot study. , 2000, Orthopedic nursing.

[20]  J. P. Miller,et al.  Effect of constraint-induced movement therapy on upper extremity function 3 to 9 months after stroke: the EXCITE randomized clinical trial. , 2006, JAMA.

[21]  H. Krebs,et al.  Mechanical Arm Trainer for the Treatment of the Severely Affected Arm After a Stroke: A Single-Blinded Randomized Trial in Two Centers , 2008, American journal of physical medicine & rehabilitation.