Global Analysis of the Relationship between Reconstructed Solar-Induced Chlorophyll Fluorescence (SIF) and Gross Primary Production (GPP)

Solar-induced chlorophyll fluorescence (SIF) is increasingly known as an effective proxy for plant photosynthesis, and therefore, has great potential in monitoring gross primary production (GPP). However, the relationship between SIF and GPP remains highly uncertain across space and time. Here, we analyzed the SIF (reconstructed, SIFc)–GPP relationships and their spatiotemporal variability, using GPP estimates from FLUXNET2015 and two spatiotemporally contiguous SIFc datasets (CSIF and GOSIF). The results showed that SIFc had significant positive correlations with GPP at the spatiotemporal scales investigated (p < 0.001). The generally linear SIFc–GPP relationships were substantially affected by spatial and temporal scales and SIFc datasets. The GPP/SIFc slope of the evergreen needleleaf forest (ENF) biome was significantly higher than the slopes of several other biomes (p < 0.05), while the other 11 biomes showed no significant differences in the GPP/SIFc slope between each other (p > 0.05). Therefore, we propose a two-slope scheme to differentiate ENF from non-ENF biome and synopsize spatiotemporal variability of the GPP/SIFc slope. The relative biases were 7.14% and 11.06% in the estimated cumulative GPP across all EC towers, respectively, for GOSIF and CSIF using a two-slope scheme. The significantly higher GPP/SIFc slopes of the ENF biome in the two-slope scheme are intriguing and deserve further study. In addition, there was still considerable dispersion in the comparisons of CSIF/GOSIF and GPP at both site and biome levels, calling for discriminatory analysis backed by higher spatial resolution to systematically address issues related to landscape heterogeneity and mismatch between SIFc pixel and the footprints of flux towers and their impacts on the SIF–GPP relationship.

[1]  C. Frankenberg,et al.  High Resolution Global Contiguous Solar‐Induced Chlorophyll Fluorescence (SIF) of Orbiting Carbon Observatory‐2 (OCO‐2) , 2018 .

[2]  Luis Guanter,et al.  A spatially downscaled sun-induced fluorescence global product for enhanced monitoring of vegetation productivity , 2020 .

[3]  T. A. Black,et al.  Assessing Tower Flux Footprint Climatology and Scaling Between Remotely Sensed and Eddy Covariance Measurements , 2009 .

[4]  Josep Peñuelas,et al.  A remotely sensed pigment index reveals photosynthetic phenology in evergreen conifers , 2016, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[5]  P. Blanken,et al.  Mechanistic evidence for tracking the seasonality of photosynthesis with solar-induced fluorescence , 2019, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[6]  B. He,et al.  Chlorophyll fluorescence observed by OCO-2 is strongly related to gross primary productivity estimated from flux towers in temperate forests , 2018 .

[7]  Jinwei Dong,et al.  A global moderate resolution dataset of gross primary production of vegetation for 2000–2016 , 2017, Scientific Data.

[8]  J. Pisek,et al.  Estimation of vegetation clumping index using MODIS BRDF data , 2011 .

[9]  I. Mammarella,et al.  Solar‐induced chlorophyll fluorescence is strongly correlated with terrestrial photosynthesis for a wide variety of biomes: First global analysis based on OCO‐2 and flux tower observations , 2018, Global change biology.

[10]  L. Guanter,et al.  Consistency Between Sun-Induced Chlorophyll Fluorescence and Gross Primary Production of Vegetation in North America , 2016 .

[11]  C. Frankenberg,et al.  Overview of Solar-Induced chlorophyll Fluorescence (SIF) from the Orbiting Carbon Observatory-2: Retrieval, cross-mission comparison, and global monitoring for GPP , 2018 .

[12]  Lifu Zhang,et al.  Monitoring Drought Effects on Vegetation Productivity Using Satellite Solar-Induced Chlorophyll Fluorescence , 2019, Remote. Sens..

[13]  Meifang Zhao,et al.  Tighten the Bolts and Nuts on GPP Estimations from Sites to the Globe: An Assessment of Remote Sensing Based LUE Models and Supporting Data Fields , 2021, Remote. Sens..

[14]  D. Baldocchi,et al.  What is global photosynthesis? History, uncertainties and opportunities , 2019, Remote Sensing of Environment.

[15]  Ying Sun,et al.  A framework for harmonizing multiple satellite instruments to generate a long-term global high spatial-resolution solar-induced chlorophyll fluorescence (SIF) , 2020 .

[16]  N. Baker Chlorophyll fluorescence: a probe of photosynthesis in vivo. , 2008, Annual review of plant biology.

[17]  Xingying Zhang,et al.  Retrieval of global terrestrial solar-induced chlorophyll fluorescence from TanSat satellite. , 2018, Science bulletin.

[18]  T. A. Black,et al.  Representativeness of Eddy-Covariance flux footprints for areas surrounding AmeriFlux sites , 2021, Agricultural and Forest Meteorology.

[19]  L. Guanter,et al.  Model-based analysis of the relationship between sun-induced chlorophyll fluorescence and gross primary production for remote sensing applications , 2016 .

[20]  C. Frankenberg,et al.  OCO-2 advances photosynthesis observation from space via solar-induced chlorophyll fluorescence , 2017, Science.

[21]  I. Mammarella,et al.  Solar‐induced chlorophyll fluorescence exhibits a universal relationship with gross primary productivity across a wide variety of biomes , 2019, Global change biology.

[22]  M. Migliavacca,et al.  Angle matters: Bidirectional effects impact the slope of relationship between gross primary productivity and sun‐induced chlorophyll fluorescence from Orbiting Carbon Observatory‐2 across biomes , 2018, Global change biology.

[23]  C. Frankenberg,et al.  Prospects for Chlorophyll Fluorescence Remote Sensing from the Orbiting Carbon Observatory-2 , 2014 .

[24]  Jingfeng Xiao,et al.  A Global, 0.05-Degree Product of Solar-Induced Chlorophyll Fluorescence Derived from OCO-2, MODIS, and Reanalysis Data , 2019, Remote. Sens..

[25]  L. Guanter,et al.  On the relationship between sub-daily instantaneous and daily total gross primary production: Implications for interpreting satellite-based SIF retrievals , 2018 .

[26]  C. Frankenberg,et al.  Linking chlorophyll a fluorescence to photosynthesis for remote sensing applications: mechanisms and challenges. , 2014, Journal of experimental botany.

[27]  L. Guanter,et al.  Satellite chlorophyll fluorescence measurements reveal large‐scale decoupling of photosynthesis and greenness dynamics in boreal evergreen forests , 2016, Global change biology.

[28]  Bin Chen,et al.  Leaf chlorophyll content as a proxy for leaf photosynthetic capacity , 2017, Global change biology.

[29]  P. Gentine,et al.  A global spatially contiguous solar-induced fluorescence (CSIF) dataset using neural networks , 2018, Biogeosciences.

[30]  Philip Lewis,et al.  Retrieval and global assessment of terrestrial chlorophyll fluorescence from GOSAT space measurements , 2012 .

[31]  T. Vesala,et al.  On the separation of net ecosystem exchange into assimilation and ecosystem respiration: review and improved algorithm , 2005 .

[32]  Xing Li,et al.  Mapping Photosynthesis Solely from Solar-Induced Chlorophyll Fluorescence: A Global, Fine-Resolution Dataset of Gross Primary Production Derived from OCO-2 , 2019, Remote. Sens..

[33]  F. Woodward,et al.  Terrestrial Gross Carbon Dioxide Uptake: Global Distribution and Covariation with Climate , 2010, Science.

[34]  Limin Yang,et al.  Development of a global land cover characteristics database and IGBP DISCover from 1 km AVHRR data , 2000 .

[35]  Rong Wang,et al.  Inter- and intra-annual variations of clumping index derived from the MODIS BRDF product , 2016, Int. J. Appl. Earth Obs. Geoinformation.

[36]  E. Middleton,et al.  Filling-in of near-infrared solar lines by terrestrial fluorescence and other geophysical effects: simulations and space-based observations from SCIAMACHY and GOSAT , 2012 .

[37]  C. Frankenberg,et al.  Global monitoring of terrestrial chlorophyll fluorescence from moderate-spectral-resolution near-infrared satellite measurements: methodology, simulations, and application to GOME-2 , 2013 .

[38]  Ying Sun,et al.  The Orbiting Carbon Observatory-2 early science investigations of regional carbon dioxide fluxes , 2017, Science.

[39]  W. Ju,et al.  Photochemical reflectance index (PRI) can be used to improve the relationship between gross primary productivity (GPP) and sun-induced chlorophyll fluorescence (SIF) , 2020 .

[40]  L. Alonso,et al.  Remote sensing of sunlight-induced chlorophyll fluorescence and reflectance of Scots pine in the boreal forest during spring recovery , 2005 .

[41]  Tatsuya Yokota,et al.  Global Concentrations of CO2 and CH4 Retrieved from GOSAT: First Preliminary Results , 2009 .

[42]  Wei Wei,et al.  Use of Sun-Induced Chlorophyll Fluorescence Obtained by OCO-2 and GOME-2 for GPP Estimates of the Heihe River Basin, China , 2018, Remote. Sens..