Design and Qualitative Testing of a Prosthetic Foot With Rotational Ankle and Metatarsal Joints to Mimic Physiological Roll-Over Shape

This paper presents the analysis, design, and preliminary testing of a prototype prosthetic foot for use in India. A concept consisting of a rigid structure with rotational joints at the ankle and metatarsal with rotational stiffnesses provided by springs is discussed. Because literature suggests that prosthetic feet that exhibit roll-over shapes similar to that of physiological feet allow more symmetric gait, the joint stiffnesses were optimized to obtain the best fit between the roll-over shape of the prototype and of a physiological foot. Using a set of published gait data for a 56.7 kg subject, the optimal stiffness values for roll-over shape that also permit the motion required for natural gait were found to be 9.3 N·m/deg at the ankle and 2.0 N·m/deg at the metatarsal. The resulting roll-over shape has an R2 value of 0.81 when compared with the physiological roll-over shape. The prototype was built and tested in Jaipur, India. Preliminary qualitative feedback from testing was positive enough to warrant further development of this design concept.Copyright © 2015 by ASME

[1]  A. Kuo,et al.  Mechanical and energetic consequences of rolling foot shape in human walking , 2013, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[2]  Andrew H Hansen,et al.  Effects of adding weight to the torso on roll-over characteristics of walking. , 2005, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[3]  Andrew H Hansen,et al.  Roll-over shapes of human locomotor systems: effects of walking speed. , 2004, Clinical biomechanics.

[4]  S. Collins,et al.  The advantages of a rolling foot in human walking , 2006, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[5]  G K Klute,et al.  Mechanical properties of prosthetic limbs: adapting to the patient. , 2001, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[6]  K. Postema,et al.  Prescription of prosthetic ankle-foot mechanisms after lower limb amputation. , 2004, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.

[7]  D. Childress,et al.  Characterisation of prosthetic feet used in low-income countries , 2004, Prosthetics and orthotics international.

[8]  J S Arora,et al.  Accelerographic, temporal, and distance gait factors in below-knee amputees. , 1977, Physical therapy.

[9]  P. K. Sethi,et al.  Vulcanized rubber foot for lower limb amputees , 1978, Prosthetics and orthotics international.

[10]  S.K. Au,et al.  Powered Ankle-Foot Prosthesis for the Improvement of Amputee Ambulation , 2007, 2007 29th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[11]  J. Perry,et al.  Prosthetic weight acceptance mechanics in transtibial amputees wearing the Single Axis, Seattle Lite, and Flex Foot. , 1997, IEEE transactions on rehabilitation engineering : a publication of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[12]  J. Lehmann,et al.  Comprehensive analysis of energy storing prosthetic feet: Flex Foot and Seattle Foot Versus Standard SACH foot. , 1993, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[13]  D. Winter,et al.  Biomechanics of below-knee amputee gait. , 1988, Journal of biomechanics.

[14]  James Breakey,et al.  GAIT OF UNILATERAL BELOW-KNEE AMPUTEES , 2011 .

[15]  Klaas Postema,et al.  A systematic literature review of the effect of different prosthetic components on human functioning with a lower-limb prosthesis. , 2004, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[16]  Helco G van Keeken,et al.  Comparative roll-over analysis of prosthetic feet. , 2009, Journal of biomechanics.

[17]  David A. Winter,et al.  Biomechanics and Motor Control of Human Movement , 1990 .

[18]  A H Hansen,et al.  Prosthetic foot rollover shapes with implications for alignment of transtibial prostheses , 2000, Prosthetics and orthotics international.

[19]  A. Lees,et al.  A biomechanical comparison of the SACH, Seattle and Jaipur feet using ground reaction forces , 1995, Prosthetics and orthotics international.

[20]  Joseph M. Czerniecki.  Gait analysis in the amputee: Has it helped the amputee or contributed to the development of improved prosthetic components? , 1995 .

[21]  C. Ekdahl,et al.  Gait in male trans-tibial amputees: A comparative study with healthy subjects in relation to walking speed , 1994, Prosthetics and orthotics international.

[22]  D. Childress,et al.  Effects of shoe heel height on biologic rollover characteristics during walking. , 2004, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[23]  J. Lehmann,et al.  Comprehensive analysis of dynamic elastic response feet: Seattle Ankle/Lite Foot versus SACH foot. , 1993, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.