Representativeness of Social Media in Great Britain: Investigating Facebook, LinkedIn, Twitter, Pinterest, Google+, and Instagram

Sociological studies show that Internet access, skills, uses, and outcomes vary between different population segments. However, we lack differentiated statistical evidence of the social characteristics of users of distinct social media platforms. We address this issue using a representative survey of Great Britain and investigate the social characteristics of six major social media platforms. We find that age and socioeconomic status are driving forces of several—but not all—of these platforms. The findings suggest that no social media platform is representative of the general population. The unrepresentativeness has major implications for research that uses social media as a data source. Social media data cannot be used to generalize to any population other than themselves.

[1]  C. Lutz.  A Social Milieu Approach to the Online Participation Divides in Germany , 2016 .

[2]  E. Hargittai.  Digital Na(t)ives? Variation in Internet Skills and Uses among Members of the “Net Generation”* , 2010 .

[3]  Jonathan Grudin,et al.  A longitudinal study of Facebook, LinkedIn, & Twitter use , 2012, CHI.

[4]  Eszter Hargittai,et al.  Whose Space? Differences Among Users and Non-Users of Social Network Sites , 2007, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[5]  Teresa Correa,et al.  The Participation Divide Among "Online Experts": Experience, Skills and Psychological Factors as Predictors of College Students' Web Content Creation , 2010, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[6]  Grant Blank.  The Digital Divide Among Twitter Users and Its Implications for Social Research , 2017 .

[7]  Heng Xu,et al.  Information Privacy Research: An Interdisciplinary Review , 2011, MIS Q..

[8]  E. Hargittai.  Is Bigger Always Better? Potential Biases of Big Data Derived from Social Network Sites , 2015 .

[9]  Michael Link,et al.  Facebook User Research Using a Probability-Based Sample and Behavioral Data , 2014, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[10]  Lindsay T. Graham,et al.  A Review of Facebook Research in the Social Sciences , 2012, Perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science.

[11]  Christo Sims.  From differentiated use to differentiating practices: negotiating legitimate participation and the production of privileged identities , 2014 .

[12]  Eszter Hargittai,et al.  The tweet smell of celebrity success: Explaining variation in Twitter adoption among a diverse group of young adults , 2011, New Media Soc..

[13]  Ardion Beldad,et al.  How shall I trust the faceless and the intangible? A literature review on the antecedents of online trust , 2010, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[14]  Ronald E. Rice,et al.  Digital Divides From Access to Activities: Comparing Mobile and Personal Computer Internet Users , 2013 .

[15]  H. Bonfadelli.  The Internet and Knowledge Gaps , 2002 .

[16]  E. Rogers,et al.  Diffusion of innovations , 1964, Encyclopedia of Sport Management.

[17]  M. Huberty.  Can we vote with our tweet? On the perennial difficulty of election forecasting with social media , 2015 .

[18]  Grant Blank,et al.  Examining Internet Use Through a Weberian Lens , 2015 .

[19]  Zeynep Tufekcioglu.  Grooming, gossip, facebook and myspace: What can we learn about these sites from those who won't assimilate? , 2008 .

[20]  Grant Blank,et al.  WHO CREATES CONTENT? , 2013 .

[21]  Alexander van Deursen,et al.  The digital divide shifts to differences in usage , 2014, New Media Soc..

[22]  W. Dutton,et al.  Age and Trust in the Internet: The Centrality of Experience and Attitudes Toward Technology in Britain , 2012 .

[23]  D. Schunk,et al.  Self-Efficacy and Academic Motivation , 2002 .

[24]  José van Dijck,et al.  'You have one identity': performing the self on Facebook and LinkedIn , 2013 .

[25]  Eszter Hargittai,et al.  Second-Level Digital Divide: Differences in People's Online Skills , 2002, First Monday.

[27]  Hans van der Heijden,et al.  User Acceptance of Hedonic Information Systems , 2004, MIS Q..

[28]  E. Hargittai,et al.  THE PARTICIPATION DIVIDE: Content creation and sharing in the digital age1 , 2008 .

[29]  Elizabeth T. McLaren.  Divorces in England and Wales, 2010 , 2011 .

[30]  Susan B. Barnes,et al.  A privacy paradox: Social networking in the United States , 2006, First Monday.

[31]  S. Korupp,et al.  Causes and Trends of the Digital Divide , 2005 .

[32]  Anabel Quan-Haase,et al.  Revisiting the digital divide in Canada: the impact of demographic factors on access to the internet, level of online activity, and social networking site usage , 2014 .

[33]  Laura Robinson.  A TASTE FOR THE NECESSARY , 2009 .

[34]  Christian Pieter Hoffmann,et al.  Content creation on the Internet: a social cognitive perspective on the participation divide , 2015 .

[35]  J. Dijk,et al.  Internet skill levels increase, but gaps widen: a longitudinal cross-sectional analysis (2010–2013) among the Dutch population , 2015 .