Integrated Model for Co-Development of Products and Production Systems - A Systems Theory Approach

The seamless co-development of products and production systems is still an unresolved challenge. Undoubtedly, progress has been made through the proposal and application of new methodologies in the collective of concurrent engineering. Still, there is a gap between modeling approaches in product development and in production system design. This gap is an obstacle, especially if many interdependencies exist among the constituents of products and production systems. This article aims at closing this gap by modeling these constituents in an integrated model. This model represents the product and the production plant as co-equal systems with subsystems, interactions, and behavior. It allows modeling every subsystem in all its lifecycle phases together with the rationale behind its design. A class model is refined for purpose of laying a structured basis for modeling that can be implemented in computer-based support. A real-life example from the automotive industry illustrates the application of an integrated model and highlights its benefits for co-development.

[1]  Ferdinand Wagner,et al.  Modeling Software with Finite State Machines : A Practical Approach , 2006 .

[2]  William L. Berry,et al.  Manufacturing Planning and Control Systems , 1984 .

[3]  Stellan Gedell,et al.  Platform Product Development: Product Model - A System Structure Composed of Configurable Components , 2001 .

[4]  George Q. Huang,et al.  Towards integrated optimal configuration of platform products, manufacturing processes, and supply chains , 2005 .

[5]  Charles Knapp,et al.  Aristotle's Metaphysics. A Revised Text, with Introduction and Commentary , 1927 .

[6]  Anders Claesson A Configurable Component Framework Supporting Platform-Based Product Development , 2006 .

[7]  Tullio Tolio,et al.  SPECIES—Co-evolution of products, processes and production systems , 2010 .

[8]  Hong-Zhong Huang,et al.  Development Mode Based on Integration of Product Models and Process Models , 2006, Concurr. Eng. Res. Appl..

[9]  Peter Checkland,et al.  Systems Thinking, Systems Practice , 1981 .

[10]  Derek K. Hitchins Advanced Systems Thinking, Engineering, and Management , 2003 .

[11]  Anders Claesson,et al.  Capturing Design Knowledge of Robust Designs Using Configurable Components , 2005 .

[12]  Robert P. Smith,et al.  A model-based method for organizing tasks in product development , 1994 .

[13]  Stellan Gedell,et al.  Design Rationale for Efficient Product Platform Development: A systematic configurable component approach , 2008 .

[14]  Xiaoqing Frank Liu,et al.  A Hierarchical Object-oriented Functional Modeling Framework for Co-Design of Mechatronic Products , 2009, Concurr. Eng. Res. Appl..

[15]  Ludwig von Bertalanffy,et al.  The History and State of General Systems Theory , 1972 .

[16]  N. F. M. Roozenburg,et al.  Product design: Fundamentals and methods , 1996 .

[17]  K. Ulrich,et al.  Planning for Product Platforms , 1998 .

[18]  Biren Prasad,et al.  Enabling principles of concurrency and simultaneity in concurrent engineering , 1999, Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing.

[19]  R. Huggett Systems thinking, systems practice , 1982 .

[20]  Vladimir Hubka,et al.  Theory of Technical Systems , 1988 .

[21]  J. Lopreato,et al.  General system theory : foundations, development, applications , 1970 .

[22]  Stellan Gedell Platform-Based Design - Design Rationale Aspects within the Configurable Component Concept , 2009 .