A state-space model of cross-region dynamic connectivity in MEG/EEG

Cross-region dynamic connectivity, which describes spatio-temporal dependence of neural activity among multiple brain regions of interest (ROIs), can provide important information for understanding cognition. For estimating such connectivity, magnetoencephalography (MEG) and electroencephalography (EEG) are well-suited tools because of their millisecond temporal resolution. However, localizing source activity in the brain requires solving an under-determined linear problem. In typical two-step approaches, researchers first solve the linear problem with general priors assuming independence across ROIs, and secondly quantify cross-region connectivity. In this work, we propose a one-step state-space model to improve estimation of dynamic connectivity. The model treats the mean activity in individual ROIs as the state variable, and describes non-stationary dynamic dependence across ROIs using time-varying auto-regression. Compared with a two-step method, which first obtains the commonly used minimum-norm estimates of source activity, and then fits the auto-regressive model, our state-space model yielded smaller estimation errors on simulated data where the model assumptions held. When applied on empirical MEG data from one participant in a scene-processing experiment, our state-space model also demonstrated intriguing preliminary results, indicating leading and lagged linear dependence between the early visual cortex and a higher-level scene-sensitive region, which could reflect feed-forward and feedback information flow within the visual cortex during scene processing.

[1]  R. Ilmoniemi,et al.  Magnetoencephalography-theory, instrumentation, and applications to noninvasive studies of the working human brain , 1993 .

[2]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Dynamic causal modeling of evoked responses in EEG and MEG , 2006, NeuroImage.

[3]  Antonio Torralba,et al.  Deep Neural Networks predict Hierarchical Spatio-temporal Cortical Dynamics of Human Visual Object Recognition , 2016, ArXiv.

[4]  R. Shumway,et al.  AN APPROACH TO TIME SERIES SMOOTHING AND FORECASTING USING THE EM ALGORITHM , 1982 .

[5]  Tohru Ozaki,et al.  A solution to the dynamical inverse problem of EEG generation using spatiotemporal Kalman filtering , 2004, NeuroImage.

[6]  David D. Cox,et al.  Untangling invariant object recognition , 2007, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[7]  E. Halgren,et al.  Top-down facilitation of visual recognition. , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[8]  D. J. Felleman,et al.  Distributed hierarchical processing in the primate cerebral cortex. , 1991, Cerebral cortex.

[9]  Stephen P. Boyd,et al.  Convex Optimization , 2004, Algorithms and Theory of Computation Handbook.

[10]  Martin Luessi,et al.  MEG and EEG data analysis with MNE-Python , 2013, Front. Neuroinform..

[11]  E. Halgren,et al.  Dynamic Statistical Parametric Mapping Combining fMRI and MEG for High-Resolution Imaging of Cortical Activity , 2000, Neuron.

[12]  Masa-aki Sato,et al.  MEG source reconstruction based on identification of directed source interactions on whole-brain anatomical networks , 2015, NeuroImage.

[13]  Russell A. Epstein,et al.  The Parahippocampal Place Area Recognition, Navigation, or Encoding? , 1999, Neuron.

[14]  A. Gramfort,et al.  Mixed-norm estimates for the M/EEG inverse problem using accelerated gradient methods , 2012, Physics in medicine and biology.

[15]  R. Leahy,et al.  EEG and MEG: forward solutions for inverse methods , 1999, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[16]  R. Ilmoniemi,et al.  Interpreting magnetic fields of the brain: minimum norm estimates , 2006, Medical and Biological Engineering and Computing.

[17]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  MEG source localization under multiple constraints: An extended Bayesian framework , 2006, NeuroImage.

[18]  Vangelis Sakkalis,et al.  Review of advanced techniques for the estimation of brain connectivity measured with EEG/MEG , 2011, Comput. Biol. Medicine.

[19]  D. Lehmann,et al.  Low resolution electromagnetic tomography: a new method for localizing electrical activity in the brain. , 1994, International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology.

[20]  Emery N. Brown,et al.  A spatiotemporal dynamic distributed solution to the MEG inverse problem , 2011, NeuroImage.