Using machine learning to predict extreme events in complex systems

Significance Understanding and predicting extreme events as well as the related anomalous statistics is a grand challenge in complex natural systems. Deep convolutional neural networks provide a useful tool to learn the essential model dynamics directly from data. A deep learning strategy is proposed to predict the extreme events that appear in turbulent dynamical systems. A truncated KdV model displaying distinctive statistics from near-Gaussian to highly skewed distributions is used as the test model. The neural network is trained using data only from the near-Gaussian regime without the occurrence of large extreme values. The optimized network demonstrates uniformly high skill in successfully capturing the solution structures in a wide variety of statistical regimes, including the highly skewed extreme events. Extreme events and the related anomalous statistics are ubiquitously observed in many natural systems, and the development of efficient methods to understand and accurately predict such representative features remains a grand challenge. Here, we investigate the skill of deep learning strategies in the prediction of extreme events in complex turbulent dynamical systems. Deep neural networks have been successfully applied to many imaging processing problems involving big data, and have recently shown potential for the study of dynamical systems. We propose to use a densely connected mixed-scale network model to capture the extreme events appearing in a truncated Korteweg–de Vries (tKdV) statistical framework, which creates anomalous skewed distributions consistent with recent laboratory experiments for shallow water waves across an abrupt depth change, where a remarkable statistical phase transition is generated by varying the inverse temperature parameter in the corresponding Gibbs invariant measures. The neural network is trained using data without knowing the explicit model dynamics, and the training data are only drawn from the near-Gaussian regime of the tKdV model solutions without the occurrence of large extreme values. A relative entropy loss function, together with empirical partition functions, is proposed for measuring the accuracy of the network output where the dominant structures in the turbulent field are emphasized. The optimized network is shown to gain uniformly high skill in accurately predicting the solutions in a wide variety of statistical regimes, including highly skewed extreme events. The technique is promising to be further applied to other complicated high-dimensional systems.

[1]  Jonathan A. Weyn,et al.  Can Machines Learn to Predict Weather? Using Deep Learning to Predict Gridded 500‐hPa Geopotential Height From Historical Weather Data , 2019, Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems.

[2]  Andrew J. Majda,et al.  Stochastic superparameterization in a one-dimensional model for wave turbulence , 2014 .

[3]  Guigang Zhang,et al.  Deep Learning , 2016, Int. J. Semantic Comput..

[4]  A. Majda,et al.  Statistical Phase Transitions and Extreme Events in Shallow Water Waves with an Abrupt Depth Change , 2020 .

[5]  Themistoklis P. Sapsis,et al.  Machine Learning Predictors of Extreme Events Occurring in Complex Dynamical Systems , 2019, Entropy.

[6]  Geoffrey E. Hinton,et al.  Deep Learning , 2015, Nature.

[7]  Themistoklis P Sapsis,et al.  Unsteady evolution of localized unidirectional deep-water wave groups. , 2014, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[8]  E Weinan,et al.  Model Reduction with Memory and the Machine Learning of Dynamical Systems , 2018, Communications in Computational Physics.

[9]  Andrew J. Majda,et al.  Intermittency in turbulent diffusion models with a mean gradient , 2015 .

[10]  Andrew J. Majda,et al.  Dispersive wave turbulence in one dimension , 2001 .

[11]  Noah D. Brenowitz,et al.  Prognostic Validation of a Neural Network Unified Physics Parameterization , 2018, Geophysical Research Letters.

[12]  P. Mahadevan,et al.  An overview , 2007, Journal of Biosciences.

[13]  E Weinan,et al.  Deep Learning-Based Numerical Methods for High-Dimensional Parabolic Partial Differential Equations and Backward Stochastic Differential Equations , 2017, Communications in Mathematics and Statistics.

[14]  George E. Karniadakis,et al.  Hidden physics models: Machine learning of nonlinear partial differential equations , 2017, J. Comput. Phys..

[15]  A. Majda,et al.  Predicting fat-tailed intermittent probability distributions in passive scalar turbulence with imperfect models through empirical information theory , 2016 .

[16]  A. Majda,et al.  Statistical dynamical model to predict extreme events and anomalous features in shallow water waves with abrupt depth change , 2019, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[17]  Andrew J. Majda,et al.  Beating the curse of dimension with accurate statistics for the Fokker–Planck equation in complex turbulent systems , 2017, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[18]  Andrew J Majda,et al.  Conceptual dynamical models for turbulence , 2014, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[19]  Jaideep Pathak,et al.  Model-Free Prediction of Large Spatiotemporally Chaotic Systems from Data: A Reservoir Computing Approach. , 2018, Physical review letters.

[20]  F. Dias,et al.  Extreme waves induced by strong depth transitions: Fully nonlinear results , 2014 .

[21]  Jürgen Schmidhuber,et al.  Deep learning in neural networks: An overview , 2014, Neural Networks.

[22]  Themistoklis P. Sapsis,et al.  Sequential sampling strategy for extreme event statistics in nonlinear dynamical systems , 2018, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[23]  Daniël M Pelt,et al.  A mixed-scale dense convolutional neural network for image analysis , 2017, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[24]  K. Speer,et al.  Anomalous wave statistics induced by abrupt depth change , 2018, Physical Review Fluids.

[25]  Arnulf Jentzen,et al.  Solving high-dimensional partial differential equations using deep learning , 2017, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[26]  Michael I. Jordan,et al.  Machine learning: Trends, perspectives, and prospects , 2015, Science.

[27]  Eric Vanden-Eijnden,et al.  Rogue waves and large deviations in deep sea , 2017, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[28]  Andrew J. Majda,et al.  Nonlinear Dynamics and Statistical Theories for Basic Geophysical Flows , 2006 .

[29]  Thomas Bolton,et al.  Applications of Deep Learning to Ocean Data Inference and Subgrid Parameterization , 2019, Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems.

[30]  SchmidhuberJürgen Deep learning in neural networks , 2015 .

[31]  A. Majda,et al.  Predicting extreme events for passive scalar turbulence in two-layer baroclinic flows through reduced-order stochastic models , 2018 .