Radiation dose reduction in digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) by means of deep-learning-based supervised image processing

To reduce cumulative radiation exposure and lifetime risks for radiation-induced cancer from breast cancer screening, we developed a deep-learning-based supervised image-processing technique called neural network convolution (NNC) for radiation dose reduction in DBT. NNC employed patched-based neural network regression in a convolutional manner to convert lower-dose (LD) to higher-dose (HD) tomosynthesis images. We trained our NNC with quarter-dose (25% of the standard dose: 12 mAs at 32 kVp) raw projection images and corresponding “teaching” higher-dose (HD) images (200% of the standard dose: 99 mAs at 32 kVp) of a breast cadaver phantom acquired with a DBT system (Selenia Dimensions, Hologic, CA). Once trained, NNC no longer requires HD images. It converts new LD images to images that look like HD images; thus the term “virtual” HD (VHD) images. We reconstructed tomosynthesis slices on a research DBT system. To determine a dose reduction rate, we acquired 4 studies of another test phantom at 4 different radiation doses (1.35, 2.7, 4.04, and 5.39 mGy entrance dose). Structural SIMilarity (SSIM) index was used to evaluate the image quality. For testing, we collected half-dose (50% of the standard dose: 32±14 mAs at 33±5 kVp) and full-dose (standard dose: 68±23 mAs at 33±5 kvp) images of 10 clinical cases with the DBT system at University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics. NNC converted half-dose DBT images of 10 clinical cases to VHD DBT images that were equivalent to full dose DBT images. Our cadaver phantom experiment demonstrated 79% dose reduction.

[1]  Laurie L Fajardo,et al.  Breast tomosynthesis: present considerations and future applications. , 2007, Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc.

[2]  Kenji Suzuki,et al.  Overview of deep learning in medical imaging , 2017, Radiological Physics and Technology.

[3]  E. Halpern,et al.  Assessing radiologist performance using combined digital mammography and breast tomosynthesis compared with digital mammography alone: results of a multicenter, multireader trial. , 2013, Radiology.

[4]  Kenji Suzuki,et al.  Massive-training support vector regression and Gaussian process for false-positive reduction in computer-aided detection of polyps in CT colonography. , 2011, Medical physics.

[5]  A. Bruckstein,et al.  K-SVD : An Algorithm for Designing of Overcomplete Dictionaries for Sparse Representation , 2005 .

[6]  Kenji Suzuki A supervised 'lesion-enhancement' filter by use of a massive-training artificial neural network (MTANN) in computer-aided diagnosis (CAD). , 2009, Physics in medicine and biology.

[7]  Kunio Doi,et al.  How can a massive training artificial neural network (MTANN) be trained with a small number of cases in the distinction between nodules and vessels in thoracic CT? , 2005, Academic radiology.

[8]  Ken-ichi Suzuki,et al.  Neural Filter with Selection of Input Features and Its Application to Image Quality Improvement of Medical Image Sequences , 2002 .

[9]  S. Armato,et al.  Mixture of expert 3D massive-training ANNs for reduction of multiple types of false positives in CAD for detection of polyps in CT colonography. , 2008, Medical physics.

[10]  Gillian D Sanders,et al.  Benefits and Harms of Breast Cancer Screening: A Systematic Review. , 2015, JAMA.

[11]  Kenji Suzuki,et al.  Extraction of left ventricular contours from left ventriculograms by means of a neural edge detector , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[12]  Hiroyuki Yoshida,et al.  Massive-training artificial neural network (MTANN) for reduction of false positives in computer-aided detection of polyps: Suppression of rectal tubes. , 2006, Medical physics.

[13]  Anders Tingberg,et al.  Breast tomosynthesis and digital mammography: a comparison of breast cancer visibility and BIRADS classification in a population of cancers with subtle mammographic findings , 2008, European Radiology.

[14]  Martin J Yaffe Reducing radiation doses for breast tomosynthesis? , 2016, The Lancet. Oncology.

[15]  Kenji Suzuki,et al.  CT colonography: advanced computer-aided detection scheme utilizing MTANNs for detection of "missed" polyps in a multicenter clinical trial. , 2009, Medical physics.

[16]  Kenji Suzuki,et al.  Massive-Training Artificial Neural Network Coupled With Laplacian-Eigenfunction-Based Dimensionality Reduction for Computer-Aided Detection of Polyps in CT Colonography , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[17]  R. Bird,et al.  Analysis of cancers missed at screening mammography. , 1992, Radiology.

[18]  Andrew D. A. Maidment,et al.  Implementation of Synthesized Two-dimensional Mammography in a Population-based Digital Breast Tomosynthesis Screening Program. , 2016, Radiology.

[19]  Kenji Suzuki,et al.  Neural Network Convolution (NNC) for Converting Ultra-Low-Dose to "Virtual" High-Dose CT Images , 2017, MLMI@MICCAI.

[20]  S. Armato,et al.  Massive training artificial neural network (MTANN) for reduction of false positives in computerized detection of lung nodules in low-dose computed tomography. , 2003, Medical physics.

[21]  Geoffrey E. Hinton,et al.  Learning representations by back-propagating errors , 1986, Nature.

[22]  Roberto Manduchi,et al.  Bilateral filtering for gray and color images , 1998, Sixth International Conference on Computer Vision (IEEE Cat. No.98CH36271).

[23]  Kenji Suzuki,et al.  Efficient approximation of neural filters for removing quantum noise from images , 2002, IEEE Trans. Signal Process..

[24]  Madhavi Raghu,et al.  Early clinical experience with digital breast tomosynthesis for screening mammography. , 2015, Radiology.

[25]  A. Elster,et al.  Risk of Radiation-induced Breast Cancer from Mammographic Screening , 2012 .

[26]  Kenji Suzuki,et al.  Neural Edge Enhancer for Supervised Edge Enhancement from Noisy Images , 2003, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[27]  R E Hendrick,et al.  Radiation risk from screening mammography of women aged 40-49 years. , 1997, Journal of the National Cancer Institute. Monographs.

[28]  C. D'Orsi,et al.  Diagnostic Performance of Digital versus Film Mammography for Breast-Cancer Screening , 2006 .

[29]  Alessandro Foi,et al.  Image Denoising by Sparse 3-D Transform-Domain Collaborative Filtering , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[30]  Laurie L Fajardo,et al.  Value analysis of digital breast tomosynthesis for breast cancer screening in a commercially-insured US population , 2015, ClinicoEconomics and outcomes research : CEOR.

[31]  Kunio Doi,et al.  Computer-aided diagnostic scheme for distinction between benign and malignant nodules in thoracic low-dose CT by use of massive training artificial neural network , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[32]  Eero P. Simoncelli,et al.  Image quality assessment: from error visibility to structural similarity , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[33]  A. Jemal,et al.  Cancer statistics, 2016 , 2016, CA: a cancer journal for clinicians.