Radiation dose of cardiac IVR x-ray systems: a comparison of present and past

Objective Although many patients benefi t greatly from fluoroscopically guided intervention (IVR) procedures such as percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), one of the major disadvantages associated with these procedures, such as cardiac IVR, is the increased patient radiation dose. This study compared the entrance surface doses of x-ray equipment for cardiac IVR at the same seven cardiac catheterization laboratories between today and the past to determine the radiation doses of current cardiac IVR x-ray systems. Methods and results This study was conducted in 2001, 2007, and 2014 at the same seven cardiac catheterization laboratories in and around Sendai City, Japan. The entrance surface doses with cineangiography and fl uoroscopy were compared in 2001 (11 x-ray systems), 2007, and 2014 (12 x-ray systems) using a 20-cm-thick acrylic plate and skin dose monitor. The x-ray conditions used in the measurements, including the image receptor fi eld magnifi cation mode and the recording speed for cineangiography and fl uoroscopy, were those normally used in the facilities performing PCI. Although presently, the entrance doses of x-ray equipment used for cardiac IVR tend to be lower than previously (fl uoroscopy dose in 2001, 19.3 ± 6.3 mGy/min; in 2014, 13.2 ± 6.5 mGy/min), some equipment has a high radiation dose. In addition, the dose diff erences of the x-ray systems in 2014 were greater than those in the past (fl uoroscopy dose in 2001, 3.4-fold; in 2014, 10.5-fold). Conclusions In IVR procedures, managing the radiation dose of cardiac IVR x-ray systems is a very important issue. Periodical measurement of the radiation dose of the x-ray equipment used for both cineangiography and fl uoroscopy for cardiac IVR is necessary.

[1]  Masayuki Zuguchi,et al.  Radiation dose to the pediatric cardiac catheterization and intervention patient. , 2010, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[2]  A. Einstein,et al.  Cardiac imaging: does radiation matter? , 2012, European heart journal.

[3]  Masayuki Zuguchi,et al.  Relationship between fluoroscopic time, dose-area product, body weight, and maximum radiation skin dose in cardiac interventional procedures. , 2006, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[4]  Jack Valentin,et al.  The 2007 Recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection. ICRP publication 103. , 2007, Annals of the ICRP.

[5]  J. Valentin,et al.  Avoidance of radiation injuries from medical interventional procedures. , 2000, Annals of the ICRP.

[6]  Masayuki Zuguchi,et al.  Does digital acquisition reduce patients' skin dose in cardiac interventional procedures? An experimental study. , 2004, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[7]  Masayuki Zuguchi,et al.  A cross‐sectional study of the radiation dose and image quality of X‐ray equipment used in IVR , 2016, Journal of applied clinical medical physics.

[8]  Comparison of radiation-induced damage between CT angiography and conventional coronary angiography , 2013, Acta cardiologica.

[9]  T. Ishibashi,et al.  Evaluation of patient radiation dose during cardiac interventional procedures: What is the most effective method? , 2009, Acta radiologica.

[10]  T. Ishibashi,et al.  Optimizing patient radiation dose in intervention procedures , 2010, Acta radiologica.

[11]  Masayuki Zuguchi,et al.  Radiation dose of interventional radiology system using a flat-panel detector. , 2009, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[12]  Masayuki Zuguchi,et al.  A Rotatable Quality Control Phantom for Evaluating the Performance of Flat Panel Detectors in Imaging Moving Objects , 2015, Journal of Digital Imaging.

[13]  Koichi Chida,et al.  Evaluating the maximum patient radiation dose in cardiac interventional procedures. , 2011, Radiation protection dosimetry.

[14]  D. Theuns,et al.  Safety and feasibility of single-catheter ablation using remote magnetic navigation for treatment of slow-fast atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia compared to conventional ablation strategies , 2013, Acta cardiologica.

[15]  Koichi Chida,et al.  The necessity of follow-up for radiation skin injuries in patients after percutaneous coronary interventions: radiation skin injuries will often be overlooked clinically , 2012, Acta radiologica.