Preservation of low frequency hearing in partial deafness cochlear implantation (PDCI) using the round window surgical approach

Conclusion. Successful hearing preservation is possible in individuals with excellent low frequency hearing. This is possible due to the partial insertion of an atraumatic electrode using an atraumatic round window surgical technique. Objectives. This paper describes the round window surgical technique used to preserve excellent low frequency hearing in patients receiving partially inserted MED-EL cochlear implant electrodes. Results of preserved low frequency hearing in partial deafness cochlear implantation (PDCI) are reported. Patients and methods. The surgical approach is described in detail. Ten subjects received a partial insertion of a standard electrode, using the round window approach. Pure tone audiometry was conducted in the implanted and non-implanted ear preoperatively, at implant fitting and then at 1, 3, 6 and 12 months after initial device fitting. Results. Results show hearing preservation in 9 of the 10 subjects. One subject lost all hearing 2 weeks after cochlear implantation. Hearing has remained essentially stable up to the 1 year postoperative period. Eight of the nine subjects use the cochlear implant together with their natural low frequency hearing; one subject uses a hearing aid in the implanted ear to amplify the low frequencies.

[1]  Bruce J Gantz,et al.  Expanding cochlear implant technology: combined electrical and acoustical speech processing , 2004, Cochlear implants international.

[2]  B. Reimer,et al.  Results of cochlear implantation in patients with severe to profound hearing loss--implications for patient selection. , 1998, Audiology : official organ of the International Society of Audiology.

[3]  C. Turner,et al.  Combining acoustic and electrical hearing , 2003 .

[4]  J. Kiefer,et al.  [Evaluation of an electrode design for the combined electric-acoustic stimulation]. , 2004, Laryngo- rhino- otologie.

[5]  Bruce J Gantz,et al.  Combining acoustic and electrical hearing. , 2003, The Laryngoscope.

[6]  Jan Kiefer,et al.  Cochlear implantation via the round window membrane minimizes trauma to cochlear structures: A histologically controlled insertion study , 2004, Acta oto-laryngologica.

[7]  Anna Piotrowska,et al.  [New method of partial deafness treatment]. , 2003, Otolaryngologia polska = The Polish otolaryngology.

[8]  Jan Kiefer,et al.  Hearing preservation in cochlear implantation for electric acoustic stimulation , 2004, Acta oto-laryngologica.

[9]  T. Lenarz Cochlear implants: selection criteria and shifting borders. , 1998, Acta oto-rhino-laryngologica Belgica.

[10]  W. Lippy,et al.  A Postoperative Audiometric Evaluation of Cochlear Implant Patients , 1988, Otolaryngology--head and neck surgery : official journal of American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery.

[11]  T. Balkany,et al.  Loss of residual hearing after cochlear implantation , 1989, The Laryngoscope.

[12]  H. Hildmann,et al.  Comparison of the TEMPO+ Ear-Level Speech Processor and the CIS PRO+ Body-Worn Processor in Adult MED-EL Cochlear Implant Users , 2001, ORL.

[13]  Jan Kiefer,et al.  Conservation of low-frequency hearing in cochlear implantation , 2004, Acta oto-laryngologica.

[14]  H J McDermott,et al.  Speech Perception with Steeply Sloping Hearing Loss: Effects of Frequency Transposition , 2000, British journal of audiology.

[15]  D Ballantyne,et al.  Delayed loss of residual hearing in Clarion® cochlear implant users , 2003, The Journal of Laryngology & Otology.

[16]  Jan Kiefer,et al.  FUNDAMENTAL ASPECTS AND FIRST RESULTS OF THE CLINICAL APPLICATION OF COMBINED ELECTRIC AND ACOUSTIC STIMULATION OF THE AUDITORY SYSTEM , 2004 .

[17]  B. Woodson,et al.  Prediction of uvulopalatopharyngoplasty response using cephalometric radiographs. , 1997, American journal of otolaryngology.

[18]  A. Hodges,et al.  Conservation of residual hearing with cochlear implantation. , 1997, The American journal of otology.

[19]  R Schrimpf,et al.  Sclerosing lesions of the temporal bone , 1982, The Laryngoscope.

[20]  R. Hartmann,et al.  Electric-Acoustic Stimulation of the Auditory System , 1999, ORL.

[21]  Anna Piotrowska,et al.  Preservation of Residual Hearing in Children and Post-Lingually Deafened Adults after Cochlear Implantation: An Initial Study , 2002, ORL.

[22]  J. Kiefer,et al.  A follow-up study of long-term results after cochlear implantation in children and adolescents , 2004, European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology.