EU emissions trading and the cement sector: a spatial competition analysis

An oligopoly competition model is described and used to illustrate the potential effect of EU emissions trading and transport issues on the production decisions and profitability of cement producers in a typical western European country market. The role of geography is introduced from three viewpoints: the existence of regional markets, the fact that EU producers may operate multiple plants across these regions, and the possibility of production capacity constraints. A typical EU state is divided into a coastal region which is initially exposed to international competition, and an inland region which is initially protected. Assuming pure auctioning of EU Allowances and a range of CO2 prices up to €50/t, our model predicts a large increase of imports into the coastal region. Consequences for the inland producers include reduced attractiveness of the coastal market, as well as increased competition from coastal producers and from non-EU imports. The model includes a number of simplifications and therefore does not claim to offer definitive predictions, but our results do suggest that an increase in non-EU imports could feasibly offset more than 70% of the decrease in EU cement sector emissions. The likely impact on producer profits is considered for each region, and the advantages and disadvantages of potential mitigating policy measures are reviewed for either the EU Allowance allocation process or border adjustments on cement products.

[1]  David M. Kreps,et al.  Quantity Precommitment and Bertrand Competition Yield Cournot Outcomes , 1983 .

[2]  C. Hepburn,et al.  The impact of CO2 emissions trading on firm profits and market prices , 2006 .

[3]  Ottar Mæstad On the Efficiency of Green Trade Policy , 1998 .

[4]  Jacques Laye,et al.  Uniqueness and characterization of capacity constrained Cournot-Nash equilibrium , 2008, Oper. Res. Lett..

[5]  Juan Carlos Ciscar,et al.  CO2 emission trading within the European Union and Annex B countries: the cement industry case , 2006 .

[6]  Juan Carlos Ciscar,et al.  Energy consumption and CO2 emissions from the world cement industry , 2003 .

[7]  Philippe Quirion,et al.  CO2 abatement, competitiveness and leakage in the European cement industry under the EU ETS: grandfathering versus output-based allocation , 2006 .

[8]  K. Neuhoff,et al.  Allocation, incentives and distortions: the impact of EU ETS emissions allowance allocations to the electricity sector , 2006 .

[9]  J. Reinaud,et al.  Industrial Competitiveness Under the European Union Emissions Trading Scheme , 2005 .

[10]  D. Harrison,et al.  Complexities of Allocation Choices in a Greenhouse Gas Emissions Trading Program , 2007 .

[11]  Philippe Quirion,et al.  European Emission Trading Scheme and competitiveness: A case study on the iron and steel industry , 2008 .

[12]  Gernot Klepper,et al.  Emissions Trading, CDM, JI, and More: The Climate Strategy of the EU , 2005 .

[13]  Michael Hoel,et al.  Should a carbon tax be differentiated across sectors , 1993 .

[14]  Joost Pauwelyn U.S. Federal Climate Policy and Competitiveness Concerns: The Limits and Options of International Trade Law , 2007 .

[15]  Sheldon Kimmel,et al.  EFFECTS OF COST CHANGES ON OLIGOPOLISTS' PROFITS* , 1992 .

[16]  Adriaan Ten Kate,et al.  To What Extent are Cost Savings Passed on to Consumers? An Oligopoly Approach , 2005 .

[17]  D. Ellerman,et al.  Border Tax Adjustments: A Feasible way to Address Nonparticipation in Emission Trading , 2004 .

[18]  Westland Square,et al.  Determining the Share of National Greenhouse Gas Emissions for Emissions Trading in Ireland , 2004 .

[19]  L. L. la Cour,et al.  Market Domination: Tests Applied to the Danish Cement Industry , 2002 .

[20]  Jean Jaskold Gabszewicz,et al.  Demand fluctuations and capacity utilization under duopoly , 1997 .

[21]  J. Reinaud,et al.  Emissions Trading and its Possible Impacts on Investment Decisions in the Power Sector , 2004 .

[22]  C. Hepburn,et al.  Emissions Trading and Profit-Neutral Grandfathering , 2006 .

[23]  Michael Grubb,et al.  Allocation and competitiveness in the EU emissions trading scheme: policy overview , 2006 .

[24]  Gernot Klepper,et al.  The EU Emissions Trading Scheme. Allowance Prices, Trade Flows, Competitiveness Effects , 2004 .