Hybrid Transition Density Approximation for Efficient Recursive Prediction of Nonlinear Dynamic Systems

For several tasks in sensor networks, such as localization, information fusion, or sensor scheduling, Bayesian estimation is of paramount importance. Due to the limited computational and memory resources of the nodes in a sensor network, evaluation of the prediction step of the Bayesian estimator has to be performed very efficiently. An exact and closed-form representation of the predicted probability density function of the system state is typically impossible to obtain, since exactly solving the prediction step for nonlinear discrete-time dynamic systems in closed form is unfeasible. Assuming additive noise, we propose an accurate approximation of the predicted density, that can be calculated efficiently by optimally approximating the transition density using a hybrid density. A hybrid density consists of two different density types: Dirac delta functions that cover the domain of the current density of the system state, and another density type, e.g. Gaussian densities, that cover the domain of the predicted density. The freely selectable, second density type of the hybrid density depends strongly on the noise affecting the nonlinear system. So, the proposed approximation framework for nonlinear prediction is not restricted to a specific noise density. It further allows an analytical evaluation of the Chapman-Kolmogorov prediction equation and can be interpreted as a deterministic sampling estimation approach. In contrast to methods using random sampling like particle filters, a dramatic reduction in the number of components and a subsequent decrease in computation time for approximating the predicted density is gained.

[1]  F. LeGland,et al.  A finite dimensional filter with exponential conditional density , 1997, Proceedings of the 36th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control.

[2]  Uwe D. Hanebeck,et al.  The hybrid density filter for nonlinear estimation based on hybrid conditional density approximation , 2007, 2007 10th International Conference on Information Fusion.

[3]  Sukhan Lee,et al.  Multisensor Fusion and Integration for Intelligent Systems , 2009 .

[4]  Jeffrey K. Uhlmann,et al.  Unscented filtering and nonlinear estimation , 2004, Proceedings of the IEEE.

[5]  H. W. Sorenson,et al.  Kalman filtering : theory and application , 1985 .

[6]  U.D. Hanebeck,et al.  Recursive Prediction of Stochastic Nonlinear Systems Based on Optimal Dirac Mixture Approximations , 2007, 2007 American Control Conference.

[7]  Uwe D. Hanebeck,et al.  Hybrid transition density approximation for efficient recursive prediction of nonlinear dynamic systems , 2007, IPSN.

[8]  Uwe D. Hanebeck,et al.  Efficient Representation and Fusion of Hybrid Joint Densities for Clusters in Nonlinear Hybrid Bayesian Networks , 2006, 2006 9th International Conference on Information Fusion.

[9]  T. Başar,et al.  A New Approach to Linear Filtering and Prediction Problems , 2001 .

[10]  Uwe D. Hanebeck,et al.  Efficient Nonlinear Bayesian Estimation based on Fourier Densities , 2006, 2006 IEEE International Conference on Multisensor Fusion and Integration for Intelligent Systems.

[11]  Petar M. Djuric,et al.  Gaussian particle filtering , 2003, IEEE Trans. Signal Process..

[12]  H. Sorenson,et al.  Nonlinear Bayesian estimation using Gaussian sum approximations , 1972 .

[13]  Uwe D. Hanebeck,et al.  Closed-Form Prediction of Nonlinear Dynamic Systems by Means of Gaussian Mixture Approximation of the Transition Density , 2006, 2006 IEEE International Conference on Multisensor Fusion and Integration for Intelligent Systems.

[14]  Uwe D. Hanebeck,et al.  A Test-Environment for Control Schemes in the Field of Collaborative Robots and Swarm Intelligence , 2005 .

[15]  Uwe D. Hanebeck,et al.  Progressive Bayes: a new framework for nonlinear state estimation , 2003, SPIE Defense + Commercial Sensing.

[16]  Art B. Owen,et al.  Monte Carlo extension of quasi-Monte Carlo , 1998, 1998 Winter Simulation Conference. Proceedings (Cat. No.98CH36274).

[17]  Fred C. Schweppe,et al.  Uncertain dynamic systems , 1973 .

[18]  Petar M. Djuric,et al.  Gaussian sum particle filtering , 2003, IEEE Trans. Signal Process..

[19]  A. Izenman Recent Developments in Nonparametric Density Estimation , 1991 .

[20]  Dennis D. Boos,et al.  Minimum Distance Estimators for Location and Goodness of Fit , 1981 .

[21]  S. Sheather Density Estimation , 2004 .

[22]  Neil J. Gordon,et al.  A tutorial on particle filters for online nonlinear/non-Gaussian Bayesian tracking , 2002, IEEE Trans. Signal Process..

[23]  Subhash Challa,et al.  Nonlinear filtering via generalized Edgeworth series and Gauss-Hermite quadrature , 2000, IEEE Trans. Signal Process..

[24]  Larry S. Davis,et al.  Quasi-Random Sampling for Condensation , 2000, ECCV.

[25]  Feng Zhao,et al.  Information-driven dynamic sensor collaboration , 2002, IEEE Signal Process. Mag..

[26]  Uwe D. Hanebeck,et al.  Dirac Mixture Density Approximation Based on Minimization of the Weighted Cramer-von Mises Distance , 2006, 2006 IEEE International Conference on Multisensor Fusion and Integration for Intelligent Systems.