An Analysis of Pure-Revenue Technology Licensing

This paper analyzes the incentives of patent holders to license their technologies for pure-revenue reasons. We hypothesize that this decision is mainly driven by characteristics of the innovation, which determine its technological attractiveness, the relevance of transaction costs in its transfer and the importance of the competition effect. By using the NBER Patent Citations Database and an original dataset of patented technologies devoted to license in an Internet marketplace, we find that importance, innovativeness, fit into the firm's core and scope of the innovation affect the patent holder's willingness to license it. Results increase our awareness on the drivers of technology licensing decisions.

[1]  A. Burns.  Comparative economic organization , 1955 .

[2]  Bart Verspagen,et al.  Everything You Always Wanted to Know About Inventors (But Never Asked): Evidence from the Patval-Eu Survey , 2006 .

[3]  Paul Almeida,et al.  Learning - by - Hiring: When Is Mobility More Likely to Facilitate Interfirm Knowledge Transfer? , 2003, Manag. Sci..

[4]  R. Nelson,et al.  On the Complex Economics of Patent Scope , 1990 .

[5]  K. Arrow.  Economic Welfare and the Allocation of Resources for Invention , 1962 .

[6]  O. Williamson.  Comparative Economic Organization: The Analysis of Discrete Structural Alternatives , 1994 .

[7]  Robert P. Merges,et al.  Contracting into Liability Rules: Intellectual Property Rights and Collective Rights Organizations , 1996 .

[8]  Albert G Z Hu,et al.  Multinational Corporations, Patenting, and Knowledge Flow: The Case of Singapore , 2004 .

[9]  M. Trajtenberg,et al.  University Versus Corporate Patents: A Window On The Basicness Of Invention , 1997 .

[10]  D. Teece.  Profiting from technological innovation: Implications for integration, collaboration, licensing and public policy , 1993 .

[11]  Scott Shane,et al.  Technological Opportunities and New Firm Creation , 2001, Manag. Sci..

[12]  M. Tushman,et al.  Technological Discontinuities and Organizational Environments , 1986 .

[13]  S. Winter.  Knowledge and Competence as Strategic Assets , 1987 .

[14]  A. Arora,et al.  Licensing the market for technology , 2003 .

[15]  Scott Shane,et al.  The Halo Effect and Technology Licensing: The Influence of Institutional Prestige on the Licensing of University Inventions , 2003, Manag. Sci..

[16]  T. Khanna,et al.  The Structure of Licensing Contracts , 2003 .

[17]  J. Lerner.  The Importance of Patent Scope: An Empirical Analysis , 1994 .

[18]  Andrea Fosfuri.  The Licensing Dilemma: Understanding the Determinants of the Rate of Technology Licensing , 2006 .

[19]  Daeho Chung,et al.  On the Licensing of HOW , 1999 .

[20]  Mark A. Schankerman,et al.  The Quality of Ideas: Measuring Innovation with Multiple Indicators , 1999 .

[21]  M. Trajtenberg.  A Penny for Your Quotes : Patent Citations and the Value of Innovations , 1990 .

[22]  A. Arora,et al.  Markets for Technology: The Economics of Innovation and Corporate Strategy , 2004 .

[23]  Gerald F. Davis,et al.  The Decline and Fall of the Conglomerate Firm in the 1980s: The Deinstitutionalization of an Organizational Form , 1994 .

[24]  D. Harhoff,et al.  Citation Frequency and the Value of Patented Inventions , 1999, Review of Economics and Statistics.

[25]  Jennifer F. Reinganum.  Uncertain Innovation and the Persistence of Monopoly , 1982 .

[26]  A. Arora,et al.  The changing technology of technological change: general and abstract knowledge and the division of , 1994 .

[27]  Patrick Sevestre,et al.  The Econometrics of Panel Data , 1993 .

[28]  A. Arora,et al.  Markets for Technology: The Economics of Innovation and Corporate Strategy , 2002 .

[29]  Bronwyn H Hall,et al.  Market value and patent citations , 2005 .

[30]  Bruno Cassiman,et al.  Optimal Project Rejection and New Firm Start-Ups , 2002, Manag. Sci..

[31]  Andrea Fosfuri,et al.  The licensing dilemma: understanding the determinants of the rate of licensing , 2004 .

[32]  N. Gallini.  Deterrence by Market Sharing: A Strategic Incentive for Licensing , 1984 .

[33]  K. Rockett.  Choosing the Competition and Patent Licensing , 1990 .