Changes in knot-holding capacity of sliding knots in vivo and tissue reaction.

OBJECTIVES To evaluate and compare the in vivo strength, knot efficiency, and knot security of 4 types of sliding knots, and to assess tissue reaction to study the effect of knot configuration, knot volume, and suture size. DESIGN Randomized trial. SETTING Experimental Medical Research Institute, Istanbul, Turkey. SUBJECTS Wistar rats. INTERVENTION To assess the tissue reaction, a midline laparotomy incision was made in 112 rats and sutured with various interrupted knots in silk and nylon sutures of 2/0 and 4/0 (United States Pharmacopeia) sizes. Suture loops were implanted in subcutaneous pouches in the rat abdomen. Sutures were all extracted at days 4, 7, 11, and 20 to determine their knot-holding capacity. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Knot efficiency and percentage decrease in knot-holding capacity were examined. Knot, tissue reaction, and inflammatory sheath volumes were measured. RESULTS The 4/0 knots lost more strength than the 2/0 knots. The alternating knots with different patterns were more efficient and secure than the simple alternating ones. The alternating parallel knot was found to be unreliable. The tissue response to all the knots, except 2/0 nylon, was similar. The inflammatory sheath volume varied depending on the knot volume, suture size, and knot configuration. CONCLUSION The use of alternating sliding knots with different patterns is recommended to replace simple alternating sliding knots.

[1]  C. Aberg,et al.  The strength of suture knots after one week in vivo. , 1976, Acta chirurgica Scandinavica.

[2]  J. Deweese,et al.  Knot security and synthetic suture materials. , 1974, American journal of surgery.

[3]  P. Gunderson.  The half-hitch knot: a rational alternative to the square knot. , 1987, American journal of surgery.

[4]  J. Trimbos,et al.  Mechanical performance of square knots and sliding knots in surgery: comparative study. , 1990, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[5]  R P Brown,et al.  Knotting technique and suture materials. , 1992, The British journal of surgery.

[6]  P. Klopper,et al.  Performance of sliding knots in monofilament and multifilament suture material , 1986, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[7]  J. Trimbos.  Security of various knots commonly used in surgical practice. , 1984, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[8]  R. Edlich,et al.  Unique performance characteristics of Novafil. , 1987, Surgery, gynecology & obstetrics.

[9]  R. Sanders,et al.  Principles of abdominal wound closure. II. Prevention of wound dehiscence. , 1977, Archives of surgery.

[10]  Trimbos Jb,et al.  Security of various knots commonly used in surgical practice. , 1984 .

[11]  G. V. Poole,et al.  A randomized trial of abdominal incision suture technique and wound strength in rats. , 1995, Archives of surgery.

[12]  R. Dinsmore.  Understanding surgical knot security: a proposal to standardize the literature. , 1995, Journal of the American College of Surgeons.

[13]  B. Craver,et al.  A new method of comparing sutures of ovine catgut with sutures of bovine catgut in three species. , 1955, Surgery, gynecology & obstetrics.

[14]  J. Herrmann.  Changes in tensile strength and knot security of surgical sutures in vivo. , 1973, Archives of surgery.

[15]  Campbell Ja,et al.  A biomechanical study of suture pullout in linea alba. , 1989 .

[16]  J. Trimbos,et al.  Knotting abilities of a new absorbable monofilament suture: poliglecaprone 25 (Monocryl). , 1995, The European journal of surgery = Acta chirurgica.

[17]  R. Brand,et al.  Tissue Reaction and Surgical Knots: The Effect of Suture Size, Knot Configuration, and Knot Volume , 1989, Obstetrics and gynecology.