One for all?! Simultaneous examination of load-inducing factors for advancing media-related instructional research

Abstract In multimedia learning settings, limitations in learners' mental resource capacities need to be considered to avoid impairing effects on learning performance. Based on the prominent and often quoted Cognitive Load Theory, this study investigates the potential of a single experimental approach to provide simultaneous and separate measures for the postulated load-inducing factors. Applying a basal letter-learning task related to the process of working memory updating, intrinsic cognitive load (by varying task complexity), extraneous cognitive load (via inducing split-attention demands) and germane cognitive load (by varying the presence of schemata) were manipulated within a 3 × 2 × 2-factorial full repeated-measures design. The performance of a student sample (N = 96) was inspected regarding reaction times and errors in updating and recall steps. Approaching the results with linear mixed models, the effect of complexity gained substantial strength, whereas the other factors received at least partial significant support. Additionally, interactions between two or all load-inducing factors occurred. Despite various open questions, the study comprises a promising step for the empirical investigation of existing construction yards in cognitive load research.

[1]  P. Chandler,et al.  Cognitive Load Theory and the Format of Instruction , 1991 .

[2]  N. Cowan An embedded-processes model of working memory , 1999 .

[3]  R. Shepard,et al.  Mental Rotation of Three-Dimensional Objects , 1971, Science.

[4]  W. Verwey,et al.  Detecting short periods of elevated workload: A comparison of nine workload assessment techniques , 1996 .

[5]  G. A. Miller THE PSYCHOLOGICAL REVIEW THE MAGICAL NUMBER SEVEN, PLUS OR MINUS TWO: SOME LIMITS ON OUR CAPACITY FOR PROCESSING INFORMATION 1 , 1956 .

[6]  J. Stevens,et al.  Applied multivariate statistics for the social sciences, 4th ed. , 2002 .

[7]  Slava Kalyuga Cognitive Load Theory: Schema Acquisition and Sources of Cognitive Load , 2010 .

[8]  W. Schnotz,et al.  A Reconsideration of Cognitive Load Theory , 2007 .

[9]  John Sweller,et al.  Cognitive Load Theory , 2020, Encyclopedia of Education and Information Technologies.

[10]  Roland Brünken,et al.  Current issues and open questions in cognitive load research , 2010 .

[11]  Andrew Gelman,et al.  Data Analysis Using Regression and Multilevel/Hierarchical Models , 2006 .

[12]  Jens F. Beckmann,et al.  Taming a Beast of Burden--On Some Issues with the Conceptualisation and Operationalisation of Cognitive Load. , 2010 .

[13]  Babette Park,et al.  Testing the additivity hypothesis of cognitive load theory , 2010 .

[14]  Tina Seufert Supporting Coherence Formation in Learning from Multiple Representations , 2003 .

[15]  J. Sweller,et al.  Cognitive load theory and music instruction , 2008 .

[16]  G. David Garson,et al.  Fundamentals of Hierarchical Linear and Multilevel Modeling , 2012 .

[17]  P. Lachenbruch Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences (2nd ed.) , 1989 .

[18]  P. Chandler,et al.  Why Some Material Is Difficult to Learn , 1994 .

[19]  Jacob Cohen Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences , 1969, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Research Design.

[20]  Slava Kalyuga,et al.  The Expertise Reversal Effect is a Variant of the More General Element Interactivity Effect , 2017 .

[21]  J. Stevens Applied Multivariate Statistics for the Social Sciences , 1986 .

[22]  J. G. Hollands,et al.  Engineering Psychology and Human Performance , 1984 .

[23]  Judith Schweppe,et al.  Attention, Working Memory, and Long-Term Memory in Multimedia Learning: An Integrated Perspective Based on Process Models of Working Memory , 2014 .

[24]  F. Paas,et al.  Cognitive Load Measurement as a Means to Advance Cognitive Load Theory , 2003 .

[25]  R. Mayer,et al.  A Split-Attention Effect in Multimedia Learning: Evidence for Dual Processing Systems in Working Memory , 1998 .

[26]  Jocelyn E. Bolin,et al.  Multilevel Modeling Using R , 2019 .

[27]  Fred Paas,et al.  Cognitive Load Theory: Measuring Cognitive Load , 2010 .

[28]  Astrid Schütz,et al.  Mehrebenenanalysen in der psychologischen Forschung , 2006 .

[29]  Richard E. Mayer,et al.  Cognitive Theory of Multimedia Learning , 2021, The Cambridge Handbook of Multimedia Learning.

[30]  R Core Team,et al.  R: A language and environment for statistical computing. , 2014 .

[31]  John Sweller,et al.  Cognitive Load During Problem Solving: Effects on Learning , 1988, Cogn. Sci..

[32]  T. Jong Cognitive load theory, educational research, and instructional design: some food for thought , 2010 .

[33]  J. Sweller Element Interactivity and Intrinsic, Extraneous, and Germane Cognitive Load , 2010 .

[34]  Cognitive load theory , 2009 .

[35]  Richard E. Mayer,et al.  The Cambridge Handbook of Multimedia Learning: Cognitive Theory of Multimedia Learning , 2005 .

[36]  Stephan Lewandowsky,et al.  The components of working memory updating: an experimental decomposition and individual differences. , 2010, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[37]  Paul Ginns Integrating information: A meta-analysis of the spatial contiguity and temporal contiguity effects , 2006 .

[38]  P. Chandler,et al.  THE SPLIT‐ATTENTION EFFECT AS A FACTOR IN THE DESIGN OF INSTRUCTION , 1992 .

[39]  Slava Kalyuga Cognitive Load Theory: How Many Types of Load Does It Really Need? , 2011 .

[40]  Nelson Cowan,et al.  The legend of the magical number seven , 2007 .

[41]  Ying-Yao Cheng,et al.  Perceived severity of cyberbullying behaviour: differences between genders, grades and participant roles , 2017 .

[42]  D. Bates,et al.  Mixed-Effects Models in S and S-PLUS , 2001 .

[43]  Tina Seufert,et al.  Cognitive load and the format of instructional aids for coherence formation , 2006 .

[44]  N. Cowan,et al.  The Magical Mystery Four , 2010, Current directions in psychological science.