Laparoscopic Pyeloplasty with Concomitant Pyelolithotomy – Is It an Effective Mode of Treatment?

Introduction: Pelviureteric junction (PUJ) obstruction and concomitant renal calculus disease may coexist. We present our experience with simultaneous laparoscopic pyeloplasty and pyelolithotomy in such patients. Method: 20 patients (20 renal units) underwent transperitoneal laparoscopic pyeloplasty and concomitant pyelolithotomy at our institution. An initial dismembering of the PUJ followed by removal of the calculi with rigid or semi-rigid graspers were done. Calyceal stones were removed with the aid of a flexible cystoscope, rigid/flexible ureteroscope and simultaneous fluoroscopy. The pyeloplasty was subsequently performed in all cases. Result: A median of 2 stones (range 1–12) were recovered from the 20 renal units. Complete stone clearance was possible in 15/20 patients (75%). Three patients underwent subsequent extracorporeal shock-wave lithotripsy and 2 required percutaneous nephrolithotomy. All patients were rendered stone-free at 6 months’ follow-up. Diuretic renography at follow-up revealed improved drainage in 18/20 (90%) patients; 2 patients had an equivocal drainage pattern but their symptoms disappeared. Conclusion: Laparoscopic pyeloplasty with concomitant pyeloplasty is feasible and effective, however patients must be counseled about the possibilities of ancillary procedures to achieve complete stone clearance.

[1]  Raju Thomas,et al.  CONCOMITANT MANAGEMENT OF RENAL CALCULI AND PELVI‐URETERIC JUNCTION OBSTRUCTION WITH ROBOTIC LAPAROSCOPIC SURGERY , 2006 .

[2]  A. Minervini,et al.  Antegrade versus retrograde endopyelotomy for pelvi-ureteric junction (PUJ) obstruction. , 2006, European urology.

[3]  T. Gianduzzo,et al.  Laparoscopic pyeloplasty: evolution of a new gold standard. , 2006, Urology.

[4]  R. Kapoor,et al.  Steps to reduce operative time in laparoscopic dismembered pyeloplasty for moderate to large renal pelvis. , 2005, Urology.

[5]  R. Kapoor,et al.  Safety profile and complications of transperitoneal laparoscopic pyeloplasty: a critical analysis. , 2005, Journal of endourology.

[6]  L. Kavoussi,et al.  Laparoscopic pyeloplasty: current status , 2005, BJU international.

[7]  V. Patel,et al.  Laparoscopic Pyeloplasty and Flexible Nephroscopy: Simultaneous Treatment of Ureteroplevic Junction Obstruction and Nephrolithiasis , 2004, JSLS : Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons.

[8]  I. Gill,et al.  Endopyeloplasty versus endopyelotomy versus laparoscopic pyeloplasty for primary ureteropelvic junction obstruction. , 2004, Urology.

[9]  M. Bhandari,et al.  Is antegrade stenting superior to retrograde stenting in laparoscopic pyeloplasty? , 2004, The Journal of urology.

[10]  H. Razvi,et al.  Percutaneous antegrade endopyelotomy: long-term results from one institution. , 2004, Urology.

[11]  L. Kavoussi,et al.  Laparoscopic pyeloplasty with concomitant pyelolithotomy. , 2002, The Journal of urology.

[12]  Louis R Kavoussi,et al.  Laparoscopic pyeloplasty: the first 100 cases. , 2002, The Journal of urology.

[13]  C. Eden,et al.  Laparoscopic dismembered pyeloplasty: 50 consecutive cases , 2001, BJU international.

[14]  J. Patard,et al.  Extraperitoneal laparoscopic pyeloplasty: a multicenter study of 55 procedures. , 2001, The Journal of urology.

[15]  L. Kavoussi,et al.  Comparison of open and endourologic approaches to the obstructed ureteropelvic junction. , 1995, Urology.

[16]  G. Preminger,et al.  Laparoscopic dismembered pyeloplasty. , 1993, The Journal of urology.

[17]  R. Clayman,et al.  Endopyelotomy: comparison of ureteroscopic retrograde and antegrade percutaneous techniques. , 1992, The Journal of urology.

[18]  K. Barber Obstruction of the ureteropelvic junction. , 1951, The Proceedings of the Institute of Medicine of Chicago.