The “Elliptical” Femoral Prosthesis

The elliptical femoral prosthesis was designed for solving the problem of the relationship between the prosthetic head and the anatomical acetabulum and to minimize the incidence of cotyloiditis, i.e. acetabular wear-protrusion and pain. Long -term clinical tests have been performed using the Cathcart prosthesis, which is the most advanced technological design. Its basic feature lies in the ellipticity of the head and its development was based on the anatomy and biomechanics of the hip: the femoral head is, in fact, naturally elliptical. The acetabulum is a “deformable” structure, the fades lunata being a stress contact and bearing area, whereas the trabecular system of a “gothic arch”, the “sourcil” and the ileum cortical laminae serve as a load distribution and carrying structure. Clinical results have shown a very low percentage of “cotyloiditis” (1-3%), thanks to the optimal relationship between the prosthetic head and the antomical acetabulum, which guarantees improved distribution of the lubrication stresses and nourishment of the articular cartilage.

[1]  R. Verdonk,et al.  The Austin Moore prosthesis. A long-term follow-up. , 1983, Acta orthopaedica Belgica.

[2]  K. Markolf,et al.  Compressive deformations of the acetabulum during in vitro loading. , 1983, Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research.

[3]  A. Alho,et al.  Acetabular protrusion following endoprosthetic hip surgery: a multifactorial study. , 1980, Acta orthopaedica Scandinavica.

[4]  B. Kummer [Functional and biomechanical anatomy of the hip]. , 1978, Acta orthopaedica Belgica.

[5]  J. Goodfellow,et al.  Joint surface incongruity and its maintenance: an experimental study. , 1977, Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery-british Volume.

[6]  M. Devas,et al.  Treatment of fractures of the femoral neck by replacement with the Thompson prosthesis. , 1976, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[7]  S A Swanson,et al.  Contact pressures in the loaded human cadaver hip. , 1975, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[8]  C. Dietschi,et al.  Experimental investigation of deformation of the weight-bearing acetabulum. , 1975, Acta orthopaedica Belgica.

[9]  J. O'Connor,et al.  The relationship between degenerative changes and load-bearing in the human hip. , 1973, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[10]  A S Greenwald,et al.  Weight-bearing areas in the human hip joint. , 1972, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[11]  G. Andersson,et al.  Results after arthroplasty of the hip with Moore's prosthesis. , 1972, Acta orthopaedica Scandinavica.

[12]  P. Byers,et al.  A post mortem study of the hip joint. Including the prevalence of the features of the right side. , 1970, Annals of the rheumatic diseases.

[13]  J. Emmett Measurements of the acetabulum. , 1967, Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research.

[14]  J. S. Barr,et al.  ARTHROPLASTY OF THE HIP. THEORETICAL AND PRACTICAL CONSIDERATIONS WITH A FOLLOW-UP STUDY OF PROSTHETIC REPLACEMENT OF THE FEMORAL HEAD AT THE MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL. , 1964, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.