Modeling and testing of PZT and PVDF piezoelectric wafer active sensors

Piezoelectric wafer active sensors (PWAS) used in structural health monitoring (SHM) applications are able to detect structural damage using Lamb waves. PWAS are small, lightweight, unobtrusive and inexpensive. They achieve direct transduction between electric and elastic wave energies. PWAS are charge mode sensors and can be used as both transmitters and receivers. The focus of this paper is to find a suitable in situ piezoelectric active sensor for sending and receiving Lamb waves to be used in the SHM of structures with a curved surface. Current SHM technology uses brittle piezoceramic (PZT) wafer active sensors. Since piezoceramics are brittle, this approach could only be used on flat surfaces. The motivation of our research was to explore the use of flexible piezoelectric materials, e.g. piezoelastic polymers such as PVDF. However, PVDF stiffness is orders of magnitude lower than the PZT stiffness, and hence PVDF Lamb wave transmitters are much weaker than PZT transmitters. Thus, our research proceeded in two main directions: (a) to model and understand how piezoelectric material properties affect the behaviour of piezoelectric wafer active sensors; and (b) to perform experiments to test the capabilities of the flexible PVDF PWAS in comparison with those of stiffer but brittle PZT PWAS. We have shown that, with appropriate signal amplification, PVDF PWAS can perform the same Lamb wave transmission and reception functions currently performed by PZT PWAS. The experimental results of PZT-PWAS and PVDF-PWAS have been compared with a conventional strain gauge. The theoretical and experimental results in this study gave a basic demonstration of the piezoelectricity of PZT-PWAS and PVDF-PWAS.

[1]  Victor Giurgiutiu,et al.  Characterization of Piezoelectric Wafer Active Sensors , 2000 .

[2]  S. Egusa,et al.  Piezoelectric paints as one approach to smart structural materials with health-monitoring capabilities , 1998 .

[3]  Sergey Edward Lyshevski,et al.  Micromechatronics: Modeling, Analysis, and Design with MATLAB , 2003 .

[4]  J. Echigoya,et al.  Directional solidification and interface structure of BaTiO3-CoFe2O4 eutectic , 2000 .

[5]  Victor Giurgiutiu,et al.  High-Field Characterization of Piezoelectric and Magnetostrictive Actuators , 2004 .

[6]  Victor Giurgiutiu,et al.  Active sensors for health monitoring of aging aerospace structures , 2000, Smart Structures.

[7]  Ning Cai,et al.  Large high-frequency magnetoelectric response in laminated composites of piezoelectric ceramics, rare-earth iron alloys and polymer , 2004 .

[8]  E. Pan,et al.  Exact Solution for Simply Supported and Multilayered Magneto-Electro-Elastic Plates , 2001 .

[9]  R Ramesh,et al.  Multiferroic BaTiO3-CoFe2O4 Nanostructures , 2004, Science.

[10]  C. Nan,et al.  Magnetoelectric effect in composites of piezoelectric and piezomagnetic phases. , 1994, Physical review. B, Condensed matter.

[11]  Andrei N Zagrai,et al.  Damage Identification in Aging Aircraft Structures with Piezoelectric Wafer Active Sensors , 2004 .

[12]  Jeong-Beom Ihn,et al.  Built-In Diagnostics for Monitoring Crack Growth in Aircraft Structures , 2001 .

[13]  S. Egusa,et al.  Piezoelectric paints: preparation and application as built-in vibration sensors of structural materials , 1993, Journal of Materials Science.

[14]  F. Yuan,et al.  Damage Detection of a Plate Using Migration Technique , 2001 .

[15]  F. Yuan,et al.  Diagnostic Lamb waves in an integrated piezoelectric sensor/actuator plate - Analytical and experimental studies , 2001 .

[16]  Wei Zhao,et al.  Piezoelectric wafer active sensor embedded ultrasonics in beams and plates , 2003 .

[17]  Victor Giurgiutiu,et al.  Theoretical and experimental investigation of magnetostrictive composite beams , 2001 .