Frequency discrimination in the auditory system: Place or periodicity mechanisms?

The pattern of all-or-none firings in many sensory nerves can usefully be modeled as a set of sample functions from non-stationary random processes whose parameters are determined by the sensory stimulus. Given such a description, one can compare the parameter estimation, discrimination, or detection performance of a human observer (as measured behaviorally) with the computed limiting performance of an ideal observer operating on the same neural input. Such a comparison is carried out in detail for the discrimination in frequency of an auditory sinusoidal tone burst. The results suggest that the human listener behaves as if he ignored (at least for this class of sounds) the periodicity information in the auditory nerve pattern (resulting from the phase-locking of the firings to the stimulus), but made full effective use of the place information (resulting primarily, although not entirely, from the mechanical tuning of the inner ear). On the other hand, it is known that the auditory system can discriminate certain more complicated stimuli on the basis of periodicity information if that is the only cue available. A modification of the structure of an optimum sinusoidal frequency discrimination system is conjectured that seems to be, at least qualitatively, consistent with the available evidence.

[1]  I. Pollack Periodicity pitch for interrupted white noise--fact or artifact? , 1969, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[2]  Georg v. Békésy Can We Feel the Nervous Discharges of the End Organs during Vibratory Stimulation of the Skin , 1962 .

[3]  James L. Flanagan,et al.  On the Pitch of Periodic Pulses , 1960 .

[4]  I. Tasaki,et al.  Nerve impulses in individual auditory nerve fibers of guinea pig. , 1954, Journal of neurophysiology.

[5]  G. P. Moore,et al.  Statistical analysis and functional interpretation of neuronal spike data. , 1966, Annual review of physiology.

[6]  V. Mountcastle,et al.  NEURAL ACTIVITY IN MECHANORECEPTIVE CUTANEOUS AFFERENTS: STIMULUS-RESPONSE RELATIONS, WEBER FUNCTIONS, AND INFORMATION TRANSMISSION. , 1965, Journal of neurophysiology.

[7]  B. L. Cardozo,et al.  Pitch of the Residue , 1962 .

[8]  G. P. Moore,et al.  SENSITIVITY OF NEURONES IN APLYSIA TO TEMPORAL PATTERN OF ARRIVING IMPULSES. , 1963, The Journal of experimental biology.

[9]  G. A. Miller,et al.  The Perception of Short Bursts of Noise , 1948 .

[10]  J. L. Goldstein,et al.  Neural correlates of the aural combination tone 2f 1 - f 2 , 1968 .

[11]  N. Kiang,et al.  LIV A Survey of Recent Developments in the Study of Auditory Physiology , 1968, The Annals of otology, rhinology, and laryngology.

[12]  J. E. Rose,et al.  Phase-locked response to low-frequency tones in single auditory nerve fibers of the squirrel monkey. , 1967, Journal of neurophysiology.

[13]  T J Goblick,et al.  Time-domain measurements of cochlear nonlinearities using combination click stimuli. , 1969, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[14]  G. A. Miller,et al.  The Perception of Repeated Bursts of Noise , 1948 .

[15]  J. L. Goldstein Auditory spectral filtering and monaural phase perception. , 1967, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[16]  W J Crozier,et al.  The Theory of the Visual Threshold: I. Time and Intensity. , 1940, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[17]  M. Sachs,et al.  Two-tone inhibition in auditory-nerve fibers. , 1968, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[18]  R. FitzHugh A STATISTICAL ANALYZER FOR OPTIC NERVE MESSAGES , 1958, The Journal of general physiology.

[19]  J. R. Pierce Proposal for an Explanation of Limens of Loudness , 1958 .