Modeling Parallelization and Flexibility Improvements in Skill Acquisition: From Dual Tasks to Complex Dynamic Skills

Emerging parallel processing and increased flexibility during the acquisition of cognitive skills form a combination that is hard to reconcile with rule-based models that often produce brittle behavior. Rule-based models can exhibit these properties by adhering to 2 principles: that the model gradually learns task-specific rules from instructions and experience, and that bottom-up processing is used whenever possible. In a model of learning perfect time-sharing in dual tasks (Schumacher et al., 2001), speedup learning and bottom-up activation of instructions can explain parallel behavior. In a model of a complex dynamic task (Carnegie Mellon University Aegis Simulation Program [CMU-ASP], Anderson et al., 2004), parallel behavior is explained by the transition from serially organized instructions to rules that are activated by both top-down (goal-driven) and bottom-up (perceptually driven) factors. Parallelism lets the model opportunistically reorder instructions, leading to the gradual emergence of new task strategies.

[1]  John R. Anderson,et al.  Human Symbol Manipulation Within an Integrated Cognitive Architecture , 2005, Cogn. Sci..

[2]  D E Kieras,et al.  A computational theory of executive cognitive processes and multiple-task performance: Part 1. Basic mechanisms. , 1997, Psychological review.

[3]  G. Logan Toward an instance theory of automatization. , 1988 .

[4]  P. Ackerman Determinants of individual differences during skill acquisition: Cognitive abilities and information processing. , 1988 .

[5]  Hubert L. Dreyfus,et al.  Mind over Machine: The Power of Human Intuition and Expertise in the Era of the Computer , 1987, IEEE Expert.

[6]  Lance Sherry,et al.  Shared Models of Flight Management System Vertical Guidance , 1999 .

[7]  James L. McClelland,et al.  Parallel distributed processing: explorations in the microstructure of cognition, vol. 1: foundations , 1986 .

[8]  A. W. Melton Categories of Human Learning , 1964 .

[9]  John R Anderson,et al.  An integrated theory of the mind. , 2004, Psychological review.

[10]  Allen Newell,et al.  The psychology of human-computer interaction , 1983 .

[11]  Anthony J. Hornof,et al.  Cognitive modeling reveals menu search in both random and systematic , 1997, CHI.

[12]  G. Logan Attention and preattention in theories of automaticity. , 1992, The American journal of psychology.

[13]  John R. Anderson,et al.  Why do children learn to say “Broke”? A model of learning the past tense without feedback , 2002, Cognition.

[14]  Michael Matessa,et al.  How Apex Automates CPM-GOMS , 2003 .

[15]  John R. Anderson,et al.  The role of examples and rules in the acquisition of a cognitive skill. , 1997, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[16]  Paul M. Fitts,et al.  Perceptual-Motor Skill Learning1 , 1964 .

[17]  Jennifer M. Glass,et al.  Virtually Perfect Time Sharing in Dual-Task Performance: Uncorking the Central Cognitive Bottleneck , 2001, Psychological science.

[18]  Dario D. Salvucci A Multitasking General Executive for Compound Continuous Tasks , 2005, Cogn. Sci..

[19]  H. Pashler Dual-task interference in simple tasks: data and theory. , 1994, Psychological bulletin.

[20]  Eliot Hazeltine,et al.  Simultaneous dual-task performance reveals parallel response selection after practice. , 2002, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[21]  John R. Anderson,et al.  Learning to achieve perfect timesharing: architectural implications of Hazeltine, Teague, and Ivry (2002). , 2005, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[22]  G. Miller,et al.  Cognitive science. , 1981, Science.

[23]  Michael D. Byrne,et al.  ACT-R/PM and menu selection: applying a cognitive architecture to HCI , 2001, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[24]  D. Kieras,et al.  Modern computational perspectives on executive mental processes and cognitive control: Where to from here? , 2000 .

[25]  Allen and Rosenbloom Paul S. Newell,et al.  Mechanisms of Skill Acquisition and the Law of Practice , 1993 .

[26]  John H. Holland,et al.  Escaping brittleness: the possibilities of general-purpose learning algorithms applied to parallel rule-based systems , 1995 .

[27]  John R. Anderson,et al.  Serial modules in parallel: the psychological refractory period and perfect time-sharing. , 2001, Psychological review.

[28]  John R. Anderson Acquisition of cognitive skill. , 1982 .

[29]  Frank J. Lee,et al.  Production Compilation: A Simple Mechanism to Model Complex Skill Acquisition , 2003, Hum. Factors.

[30]  Michael E. Atwood,et al.  Project Ernestine: Validating a GOMS Analysis for Predicting and Explaining Real-World Task Performance , 1993, Hum. Comput. Interact..

[31]  Wayne D. Gray The nature and processing of errors in interactive behavior , 2000, Cogn. Sci..

[32]  Richard Reviewer-Granger Unified Theories of Cognition , 1991, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.