Post-Earthquake Recovery Phase Monitoring and Mapping Based on UAS Data

Geoinformatics plays an essential role during the recovery phase of a post-earthquake situation. The aim of this paper is to present the methodology followed and the results obtained by the utilization of Unmanned Aircraft Systems (UASs) 4K-video footage processing and the automation of geo-information methods targeted at both monitoring the demolition process and mapping the demolished buildings. The field campaigns took place on the traditional settlement of Vrisa (Lesvos, Greece), which was heavily damaged by a strong earthquake (Mw=6.3) on June 12th, 2017. For this purpose, a flight campaign took place on 3rd February 2019 for collecting aerial 4K video footage using an Unmanned Aircraft. The Structure from Motion (SfM) method was applied on frames which derived from the 4K video footage, for producing accurate and very detailed 3D point clouds, as well as the Digital Surface Model (DSM) of the building stock of the Vrisa traditional settlement, twenty months after the earthquake. This dataset has been compared with the corresponding one which derived from 25th July 2017, a few days after the earthquake. Two algorithms have been developed for detecting the demolished buildings of the affected area, based on the DSMs and 3D point clouds, correspondingly. The results obtained have been tested through field studies and demonstrate that this methodology is feasible and effective in building demolition detection, giving very accurate results (97%) and, in parallel, is easily applicable and suit well for rapid demolition mapping during the recovery phase of a post-earthquake scenario. The significant advantage of the proposed methodology is its ability to provide reliable results in a very low cost and time-efficient way and to serve all stakeholders and national and local organizations that are responsible for post-earthquake management.

[1]  Paolo Zampieri,et al.  Sustainable management of demolition waste in post-quake recovery processes: The Italian experience , 2017 .

[2]  Filiberto Chiabrando,et al.  Phased Reconnaissance Approach to Documenting Landslides following the 2016 Central Italy Earthquakes , 2018, Earthquake Spectra.

[3]  M. Westoby,et al.  ‘Structure-from-Motion’ photogrammetry: A low-cost, effective tool for geoscience applications , 2012 .

[4]  Anastasia Kiratzi,et al.  The 12 June 2017 Mw 6.3 Lesvos Island (Aegean Sea) earthquake: Slip model and directivity estimated with finite-fault inversion , 2018 .

[5]  Aydan Menderes,et al.  Automatic Detection of Damaged Buildings after Earthquake Hazard by Using Remote Sensing and Information Technologies , 2015 .

[6]  Thomas Blaschke,et al.  Monitoring recovery after earthquakes through the integration of remote sensing, GIS, and ground observations: the case of L’Aquila (Italy) , 2016 .

[7]  Bernhard Rinner,et al.  Networked UAVs as aerial sensor network for disaster management applications , 2010, Elektrotech. Informationstechnik.

[8]  V. Bhanumurthy,et al.  Defining a framework for integration of geospatial technologies for emergency management , 2015 .

[9]  D. Alexander The L'Aquila Earthquake of 6 April 2009 and Italian Government Policy on Disaster Response , 2010 .

[10]  T. Blaschke,et al.  Measuring the progress of a recovery process after an earthquake: The case of L'aquila, Italy , 2017, International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction.

[11]  M. Turker,et al.  Automatic detection of earthquake‐damaged buildings using DEMs created from pre‐ and post‐earthquake stereo aerial photographs , 2005 .

[12]  D. Dominici,et al.  UAV photogrammetry in the post-earthquake scenario: case studies in L'Aquila , 2017 .

[13]  HornikKurt The Comprehensive R Archive Network , 2012 .

[14]  Nikolaos Soulakellis,et al.  Fusing Landsat-5/TM Imagery and Shaded Relief Maps in Tectonic and Geomorphic Mapping: Lesvos Island, Greece , 2006 .

[15]  A. Vetrivel,et al.  Identification of damage in buildings based on gaps in 3D point clouds from very high resolution oblique airborne images , 2015 .

[16]  Kurt Hornik,et al.  The Comprehensive R Archive Network , 2012 .

[17]  Thomas Blaschke,et al.  Myths and realities about the recovery of L׳Aquila after the earthquake , 2014, International journal of disaster risk reduction : IJDRR.

[18]  Jiaojiao Tian,et al.  3D change detection – Approaches and applications , 2016 .

[19]  Rou-Fei Chen,et al.  Geomorphological evolution of landslides near an active normal fault in northern Taiwan, as revealed by lidar and unmanned aircraft system data , 2017 .

[20]  Jacob Cohen A Coefficient of Agreement for Nominal Scales , 1960 .

[21]  F. Chiabrando,et al.  Multitemporal 3D modelling for cultural heritage emergency during seismic events: Damage assesment of S. Agostino church in Amatrice (RI) , 2017 .

[22]  Filiberto Chiabrando,et al.  UAV Deployment Exercise for Mapping Purposes: Evaluation of Emergency Response Applications , 2015, Sensors.

[23]  Dilanthi Amaratunga,et al.  Capacity building for post disaster construction and demolition waste management: A case of Sri Lanka , 2016 .

[24]  P. Carydis,et al.  UAV and GIS based rapid earthquake-induced building damage assessment and methodology for EMS-98 isoseismal map drawing: The June 12, 2017 Mw 6.3 Lesvos (Northeastern Aegean, Greece) earthquake , 2019, International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction.

[25]  Giovanni Forte,et al.  Post flash flood survey: the 14th and 15th October 2015 event in the Paupisi-Solopaca area (Southern Italy) , 2017 .

[26]  Bruno Pace,et al.  Coseismic Slip Vectors of 24 August and 30 October 2016 Earthquakes in Central Italy: Oblique Slip and Regional Kinematic Implications , 2018, Tectonics.

[27]  K. Hornik,et al.  Model-Based Recursive Partitioning , 2008 .

[28]  Fumio Yamazaki,et al.  Monitoring and evaluation of the urban reconstruction process in Bam, Iran, after the 2003 Mw 6.6 earthquake , 2016, Natural Hazards.

[29]  Rama Rao Nidamanuri,et al.  Segmentation based building detection approach from LiDAR point cloud , 2017 .

[30]  Jean Ponce,et al.  Accurate, Dense, and Robust Multiview Stereopsis , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[31]  Antonia Teresa Spano,et al.  UAV STRATEGIES VALIDATION AND REMOTE SENSING DATA FOR DAMAGE ASSESSMENT IN POST-DISASTER SCENARIOS , 2018 .

[32]  G-Akis Tselentis,et al.  The 12 th June 2017 M w = 6.3 Lesvos earthquake from detailed seismological observations , 2018 .

[33]  K. Oštir,et al.  Monitoring the Potoška planina landslide (NW Slovenia) using UAV photogrammetry and tachymetric measurements , 2017, Landslides.

[34]  Christopher Gomez,et al.  UAV- based Photogrammetry and Geocomputing for Hazards and Disaster Risk Monitoring – A Review , 2016, Geoenvironmental Disasters.

[35]  D. Giordan,et al.  Preface: The use of remotely piloted aircraft systems (RPAS) in monitoring applications and management of natural hazards , 2018, Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences.